Theorem bnj561 35399

Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 35417. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj561.18	⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚))
bnj561.19	⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))
bnj561.37	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj561	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj561

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj561.18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚))
2		bnj561.19	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))
3	1, 2	bnj556 35396	. 2 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜎)
4		bnj561.37	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛)
5	3, 4	syl3an3 1183	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  suc csuc 6363   Fn wfn 6532  ωcom 7865   ∧ w-bnj17 35183   FrSe w-bnj15 35189

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-v 3455  df-un 3907  df-sn 4588  df-suc 6367  df-bnj17 35184

This theorem is used by:  bnj600  35415  bnj908  35427