Theorem bnj556 33911

Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 33932. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj556.18	⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚))
bnj556.19	⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj556	⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜎)

Proof of Theorem bnj556

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3479	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑝 ∈ V
2	1	bnj216 33743	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑚 = suc 𝑝 → 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚)
3	2	3anim3i 1155	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝) → (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚))
4	3	adantr 482	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝) ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω) → (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚))
5		bnj556.19	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))
6		bnj258 33719	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝) ↔ ((𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝) ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω))
7	5, 6	bitri 275	. 2 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ ((𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝) ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω))
8		bnj556.18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚))
9	4, 7, 8	3imtr4i 292	1 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜎)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 397   ∧ w3a 1088   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2107  suc csuc 6367  ωcom 7855   ∧ w-bnj17 33697

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-ext 2704

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1783  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-v 3477  df-un 3954  df-sn 4630  df-suc 6371  df-bnj17 33698

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj557  33912  bnj561  33914  bnj562  33915