Theorem bnj562 35233

Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 35250. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj562.18	⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚))
bnj562.19	⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))
bnj562.38	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → 𝜑″)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj562	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜑″)

Proof of Theorem bnj562

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj562.18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚))
2		bnj562.19	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))
3	1, 2	bnj556 35229	. 2 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜎)
4		bnj562.38	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → 𝜑″)
5	3, 4	syl3an3 1181	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜑″)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ w3a 1101   = wceq 1567   ∈ wcel 2149  suc csuc 6359  ωcom 7858   ∧ w-bnj17 35016   FrSe w-bnj15 35022

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-ext 2741

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-ex 1807  df-sb 2098  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-v 3465  df-un 3918  df-sn 4592  df-suc 6363  df-bnj17 35017

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj600  35248  bnj908  35260