Theorem bnj558 34899

Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 34918. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj558.3	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj558.16	⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})
bnj558.17	⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑚 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′))
bnj558.18	⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚))
bnj558.19	⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))
bnj558.20	⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑖))
bnj558.21	⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
bnj558.22	⊢ 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
bnj558.23	⊢ 𝐾 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
bnj558.24	⊢ 𝐿 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
bnj558.25	⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝐶⟩})
bnj558.28	⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))
bnj558.29	⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
bnj558.36	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj558	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) → (𝐺‘suc 𝑖) = 𝐾)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑖,𝑝,𝑦   𝑦,𝐺   𝑅,𝑖,𝑝,𝑦   𝑓,𝑖,𝑝,𝑦   𝑖,𝑚,𝑝   𝑝,𝜑′

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜏(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜂(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜁(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜎(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐴(𝑥,𝑓,𝑚,𝑛)   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐶(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐷(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝑅(𝑥,𝑓,𝑚,𝑛)   𝐺(𝑥,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐾(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐿(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜑′(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝜓′(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)

Proof of Theorem bnj558

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj558.3	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
2		bnj558.16	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})
3		bnj558.17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑚 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′))
4		bnj558.18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚))
5		bnj558.19	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))
6		bnj558.20	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑖))
7		bnj558.21	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
8		bnj558.22	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
9		bnj558.23	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐾 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
10		bnj558.24	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐿 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
11		bnj558.25	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝐶⟩})
12		bnj558.28	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))
13		bnj558.29	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
14		bnj558.36	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛)
15	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14	bnj557 34898	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) → (𝐺‘𝑚) = 𝐿)
16		bnj422 34712	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) ↔ (𝜂 ∧ 𝜁 ∧ 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏))
17		bnj253 34701	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜁 ∧ 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏) ↔ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏))
18	16, 17	bitri 275	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) ↔ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏))
19	18	simp1bi 1145	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) → (𝜂 ∧ 𝜁))
20	5, 6, 9, 10, 9, 10	bnj554 34896	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) → ((𝐺‘𝑚) = 𝐿 ↔ (𝐺‘suc 𝑖) = 𝐾))
21	19, 20	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) → ((𝐺‘𝑚) = 𝐿 ↔ (𝐺‘suc 𝑖) = 𝐾))
22	15, 21	mpbid 232	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) → (𝐺‘suc 𝑖) = 𝐾)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  ∀wral 3045   ∖ cdif 3914   ∪ cun 3915  ∅c0 4299  {csn 4592  ⟨cop 4598  ∪ ciun 4958  suc csuc 6337   Fn wfn 6509  ‘cfv 6514  ωcom 7845   ∧ w-bnj17 34683   predc-bnj14 34685   FrSe w-bnj15 34689

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5254  ax-nul 5264  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7714  ax-reg 9552

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-ne 2927  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-dif 3920  df-un 3922  df-in 3924  df-ss 3934  df-nul 4300  df-if 4492  df-pw 4568  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-op 4599  df-uni 4875  df-iun 4960  df-br 5111  df-opab 5173  df-id 5536  df-eprel 5541  df-fr 5594  df-xp 5647  df-rel 5648  df-cnv 5649  df-co 5650  df-dm 5651  df-res 5653  df-suc 6341  df-iota 6467  df-fun 6516  df-fn 6517  df-fv 6522  df-bnj17 34684

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj571  34903