Theorem dfdisjALTV 38712

Description: Alternate definition of the disjoint relation predicate. A disjoint relation is a converse function of the relation, see the comment of df-disjs 38703 why we need disjoint relations instead of converse functions anyway. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jul-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfdisjALTV	⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ ( FunALTV ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))

Proof of Theorem dfdisjALTV

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-disjALTV 38704	. 2 ⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ ( CnvRefRel ≀ ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
2		relcnv 6078	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel ◡𝑅
3		df-funALTV 38681	. . . 4 ⊢ ( FunALTV ◡𝑅 ↔ ( CnvRefRel ≀ ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel ◡𝑅))
4	2, 3	mpbiran2 710	. . 3 ⊢ ( FunALTV ◡𝑅 ↔ CnvRefRel ≀ ◡𝑅)
5	4	anbi1i 624	. 2 ⊢ (( FunALTV ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ ( CnvRefRel ≀ ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
6	1, 5	bitr4i 278	1 ⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ ( FunALTV ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ^◡ccnv 5640  Rel wrel 5646   ≀ ccoss 38176   CnvRefRel wcnvrefrel 38185   FunALTV wfunALTV 38207   Disj wdisjALTV 38210

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2702

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1543  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-v 3452  df-ss 3934  df-opab 5173  df-xp 5647  df-rel 5648  df-cnv 5649  df-funALTV 38681  df-disjALTV 38704

This theorem is referenced by:  disjss  38730