Theorem dfdisjALTV 39137

Description: Alternate definition of the disjoint relation predicate. A disjoint relation is a converse function of the relation, see the comment of df-disjs 39128 why we need disjoint relations instead of converse functions anyway. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jul-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfdisjALTV	⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ ( FunALTV ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))

Proof of Theorem dfdisjALTV

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-disjALTV 39129	. 2 ⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ ( CnvRefRel ≀ ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
2		relcnv 6065	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel ◡𝑅
3		df-funALTV 39106	. . . 4 ⊢ ( FunALTV ◡𝑅 ↔ ( CnvRefRel ≀ ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel ◡𝑅))
4	2, 3	mpbiran2 711	. . 3 ⊢ ( FunALTV ◡𝑅 ↔ CnvRefRel ≀ ◡𝑅)
5	4	anbi1i 625	. 2 ⊢ (( FunALTV ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ ( CnvRefRel ≀ ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
6	1, 5	bitr4i 278	1 ⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ ( FunALTV ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ^◡ccnv 5625  Rel wrel 5631   ≀ ccoss 38522   CnvRefRel wcnvrefrel 38531   FunALTV wfunALTV 38555   Disj wdisjALTV 38558

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-v 3432  df-ss 3907  df-opab 5149  df-xp 5632  df-rel 5633  df-cnv 5634  df-funALTV 39106  df-disjALTV 39129

This theorem is referenced by:  disjqmap2  39165  disjss  39170