Theorem mopick2 2667

Description: "At most one" can show the existence of a common value. In this case we can infer existence of conjunction from a conjunction of existence, and it is one way to achieve the converse of 19.40 1919. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mopick2	⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem mopick2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfmo1 2587	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃*𝑥𝜑
2		nfe1 2188	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)
3	1, 2	nfan 1932	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
4		mopick 2655	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
5	4	ancld 560	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
6	5	anim1d 623	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒)))
7		df-3an 1105	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒))
8	6, 7	imbitrrdi 255	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
9	3, 8	eximd 2255	. 2 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
10	9	3impia 1135	1 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103  ∃wex 1812  ∃*wmo 2567

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-mo 2569

This theorem is used by:  moantr  39081