Theorem prsss 33919

Description: Relation of a subproset. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Sep-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ordtNEW.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
ordtNEW.l	⊢ ≤ = ((le‘𝐾) ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐵))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
prsss	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Proset ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → ( ≤ ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ((le‘𝐾) ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))

Proof of Theorem prsss

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ordtNEW.l	. . . . 5 ⊢ ≤ = ((le‘𝐾) ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐵))
2	1	ineq1i 4164	. . . 4 ⊢ ( ≤ ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (((le‘𝐾) ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))
3		inass 4176	. . . 4 ⊢ (((le‘𝐾) ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ((le‘𝐾) ∩ ((𝐵 × 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
4	2, 3	eqtri 2753	. . 3 ⊢ ( ≤ ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ((le‘𝐾) ∩ ((𝐵 × 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
5		xpss12 5629	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐵 × 𝐵))
6	5	anidms 566	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐵 × 𝐵))
7		sseqin2 4171	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↔ ((𝐵 × 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (𝐴 × 𝐴))
8	6, 7	sylib 218	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝐵 × 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (𝐴 × 𝐴))
9	8	ineq2d 4168	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((le‘𝐾) ∩ ((𝐵 × 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) = ((le‘𝐾) ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
10	4, 9	eqtrid 2777	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ( ≤ ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ((le‘𝐾) ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
11	10	adantl 481	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Proset ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → ( ≤ ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ((le‘𝐾) ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2110   ∩ cin 3899   ⊆ wss 3900   × cxp 5612  ‘cfv 6477  Basecbs 17112  lecple 17160   Proset cproset 18190

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-ext 2702

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2067  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-rab 3394  df-v 3436  df-in 3907  df-ss 3917  df-opab 5152  df-xp 5620

This theorem is referenced by:  prsssdm  33920  ordtrestNEW  33924  ordtrest2NEW  33926