Theorem rabbida 3459

Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction form). Version of rabbidva 3440 with disjoint variable condition replaced by nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.) Avoid ax-10 2138, ax-11 2155. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 14-Mar-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabbida.n	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
rabbida.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabbida	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})

Proof of Theorem rabbida

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabbida.n	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		rabbida.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	pm5.32da 580	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
4	1, 3	rabbida4 3458	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 397   = wceq 1542  Ⅎwnf 1786   ∈ wcel 2107  {crab 3433

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-9 2117  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2704

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-rab 3434

This theorem is referenced by:  rabbid  3460  rabeqbida  3462  smfpimltmpt  45396  smfpimltxrmptf  45408  smfpimgtmpt  45431  smfpimgtxrmptf  45434  smfrec  45439  smfsupmpt  45465  smfinflem  45467  smfinfmpt  45469