Theorem rabbida 3441

Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction form). Version of rabbidva 3422 with disjoint variable condition replaced by nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.) Avoid ax-10 2180, ax-11 2197. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 14-Mar-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabbida.n	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
rabbida.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabbida	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})

Proof of Theorem rabbida

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabbida.n	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		rabbida.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	pm5.32da 590	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
4	1, 3	rabbida4 3440	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  Ⅎwnf 1816   ∈ wcel 2147  {crab 3416

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-9 2157  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-rab 3417

This theorem is used by:  rabbid  3442  rabeqbida  3444  smfpimltmpt  47961  smfpimltxrmptf  47973  smfpimgtmpt  47996  smfpimgtxrmptf  47999  smfrec  48004  smfsupmpt  48030  smfinflem  48032  smfinfmpt  48034