Theorem rabbida 3437

Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction form). Version of rabbidva 3418 with disjoint variable condition replaced by nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.) Avoid ax-10 2178, ax-11 2194. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 14-Mar-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabbida.n	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
rabbida.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabbida	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})

Proof of Theorem rabbida

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabbida.n	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		rabbida.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	pm5.32da 590	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
4	1, 3	rabbida4 3436	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  Ⅎwnf 1816   ∈ wcel 2145  {crab 3412

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-9 2155  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-rab 3413

This theorem is used by:  rabbid  3438  rabeqbida  3440  smfpimltmpt  47678  smfpimltxrmptf  47690  smfpimgtmpt  47713  smfpimgtxrmptf  47716  smfrec  47721  smfsupmpt  47747  smfinflem  47749  smfinfmpt  47751