| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rabid2f | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: An "identity" law for restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2017.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabid2f.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabid2f | ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | rabid2f.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
| 2 | 1 | eqabf 2926 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
| 3 | pm4.71 557 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
| 4 | 3 | albii 1820 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
| 5 | 2, 4 | bitr4i 278 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) |
| 6 | df-rab 3398 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 7 | 6 | eqeq2i 2747 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
| 8 | df-ral 3050 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) | |
| 9 | 5, 7, 8 | 3bitr4i 303 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 ∀wal 1539 = wceq 1541 ∈ wcel 2113 {cab 2712 Ⅎwnfc 2881 ∀wral 3049 {crab 3397 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1968 ax-7 2009 ax-8 2115 ax-9 2123 ax-10 2146 ax-11 2162 ax-12 2182 ax-ext 2706 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-tru 1544 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2068 df-clab 2713 df-cleq 2726 df-clel 2809 df-nfc 2883 df-ral 3050 df-rab 3398 |
| This theorem is referenced by: rabid2 3430 funcnvmpt 32694 dmmptdff 45409 dmmptdf2 45419 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |