![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rabid2f | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: An "identity" law for restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabid2f.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabid2f | ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | rabid2f.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
2 | 1 | eqabf 2933 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
3 | pm4.71 557 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
4 | 3 | albii 1816 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
5 | 2, 4 | bitr4i 278 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) |
6 | df-rab 3434 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
7 | 6 | eqeq2i 2748 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
8 | df-ral 3060 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) | |
9 | 5, 7, 8 | 3bitr4i 303 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 ∀wal 1535 = wceq 1537 ∈ wcel 2106 {cab 2712 Ⅎwnfc 2888 ∀wral 3059 {crab 3433 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1792 ax-4 1806 ax-5 1908 ax-6 1965 ax-7 2005 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-10 2139 ax-11 2155 ax-12 2175 ax-ext 2706 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-tru 1540 df-ex 1777 df-nf 1781 df-sb 2063 df-clab 2713 df-cleq 2727 df-clel 2814 df-nfc 2890 df-ral 3060 df-rab 3434 |
This theorem is referenced by: rabid2 3468 funcnvmpt 32684 dmmptdff 45166 dmmptdf2 45176 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |