Theorem rabbi 3441

Description: Equivalent wff's correspond to equal restricted class abstractions. Closed theorem form of rabbii 3417. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabbi	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})

Proof of Theorem rabbi

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		abbib 2829	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
2		df-rab 3413	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
3		df-rab 3413	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)}
4	2, 3	eqeq12i 2778	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒} ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)})
5		df-ral 3077	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))
6		pm5.32 584	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
7	6	albii 1851	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
8	5, 7	bitri 278	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
9	1, 4, 8	3bitr4ri 307	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1567   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  {cab 2738  ∀wral 3076  {crab 3412

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1572  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-ral 3077  df-rab 3413

This theorem is used by:  kqfeq  24050  isr0  24063  rabeq12f  39196  eq0rabdioph  43894  eqrabdioph  43895  lerabdioph  43919  eluzrabdioph  43920  ltrabdioph  43922  nerabdioph  43923  dvdsrabdioph  43924  undisjrab  45397  ioodvbdlimc1lem2  47049  ioodvbdlimc2lem  47051  fourierdlem89  47312  fourierdlem91  47314  fourierdlem100  47323  fourierdlem108  47331  fourierdlem112  47335  ovn0  47683  issmfdmpt  47865  line2x  49973  line2y  49974