Theorem rexeqbidva 3327

Description: Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
raleqbidva.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
raleqbidva.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexeqbidva	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rexeqbidva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		raleqbidva.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	rexbidva 3184	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
3		raleqbidva.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
4	3	rexeqdv 3321	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
5	2, 4	bitrd 281	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1560   ∈ wcel 2142  ∃wrex 3086

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1815  ax-4 1829  ax-5 1930  ax-6 1987  ax-7 2028  ax-9 2152  ax-ext 2734

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-ex 1800  df-cleq 2754  df-rex 3087

This theorem is referenced by:  rexeqbidvv  3329  catpropd  17741  addsval  28052  istrkgcb  28622  isperp  28882  perpcom  28883  eengtrkg  29184  eengtrkge  29185  opprqusdrng  33678  fldextrspunlsplem  33967  afsval  34965  matunitlindflem2  38113  rrxlines  49352