Theorem rexeqbidva 3299

Description: Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
raleqbidva.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
raleqbidva.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexeqbidva	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rexeqbidva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		raleqbidva.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	rexbidva 3154	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
3		raleqbidva.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
4	3	rexeqdv 3293	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
5	2, 4	bitrd 279	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2111  ∃wrex 3056

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-9 2121  ax-ext 2703

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1781  df-cleq 2723  df-rex 3057

This theorem is referenced by:  rexeqbidvv  3302  catpropd  17615  addsval  27905  istrkgcb  28434  isperp  28690  perpcom  28691  eengtrkg  28964  eengtrkge  28965  opprqusdrng  33458  fldextrspunlsplem  33686  afsval  34684  matunitlindflem2  37665  rrxlines  48773