Theorem raleqbidva 3319

Description: Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
raleqbidva.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
raleqbidva.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
raleqbidva	⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem raleqbidva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		raleqbidva.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	ralbidva 3168	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
3		raleqbidva.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
4	3	raleqdv 3311	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
5	2, 4	bitrd 278	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2106  ∀wral 3060

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-9 2116  ax-ext 2702

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-ex 1782  df-cleq 2723  df-ral 3061

This theorem is referenced by:  catpropd  17603  cidpropd  17604  funcpropd  17801  fullpropd  17821  natpropd  17879  gsumpropd2lem  18548  istrkgcb  27461  iscgrg  27517  isperp  27717  clwlkclwwlk  29009  rngurd  32135  lindfpropd  32242  ist0cld  32503  matunitlindflem1  36147  sticksstones3  40629  sticksstones11  40637