Theorem raleqbidva 3328

Description: Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
raleqbidva.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
raleqbidva.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
raleqbidva	⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem raleqbidva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		raleqbidva.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	ralbidva 3185	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
3		raleqbidva.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
4	3	raleqdv 3322	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
5	2, 4	bitrd 282	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2142  ∀wral 3078

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-9 2152  ax-ext 2734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-ex 1809  df-cleq 2754  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089

This theorem is used by:  raleqbidvv  3330  catpropd  17771  cidpropd  17772  funcpropd  17965  fullpropd  17985  natpropd  18042  gsumpropd2lem  18743  ringurd  20273  istrkgcb  28736  iscgrg  28792  isperp  29003  clwlkclwwlk  30364  urpropd  33559  domnpropd  33609  lindfpropd  33704  opprqus0g  33781  opprqusdrng  33784  ist0cld  34232  matunitlindflem1  38295  primrootsunit1  42892  sticksstones3  42943  uppropd  49987  lanup  50447  ranup  50448