Theorem sbc2or 3786

Description: The disjunction of two equivalences for class substitution does not require a class existence hypothesis. This theorem tells us that there are only 2 possibilities for [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 behavior at proper classes, matching the sbc5 3805 (false) and sbc6 3809 (true) conclusions. This is interesting since dfsbcq 3779 and dfsbcq2 3780 (from which it is derived) do not appear to say anything obvious about proper class behavior. Note that this theorem does not tell us that it is always one or the other at proper classes; it could "flip" between false (the first disjunct) and true (the second disjunct) as a function of some other variable 𝑦 that 𝜑 or 𝐴 may contain. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbc2or	⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem sbc2or

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfsbcq2 3780	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
2		eqeq2 2745	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
3	2	anbi1d 631	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
4	3	exbidv 1925	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
5		sb5 2268	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
6	1, 4, 5	vtoclbg 3560	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
7	6	orcd 872	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))))
8		pm5.15 1012	. . 3 ⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
9		vex 3479	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
10		eleq1 2822	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 ∈ V))
11	9, 10	mpbii 232	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
12	11	adantr 482	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
13	12	con3i 154	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
14	13	nexdv 1940	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
15	11	con3i 154	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐴)
16	15	pm2.21d 121	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))
17	16	alrimiv 1931	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))
18	14, 17	2thd 265	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
19	18	bibi2d 343	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))))
20	19	orbi2d 915	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ((([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) ↔ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))))
21	8, 20	mpbii 232	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))))
22	7, 21	pm2.61i 182	1 ⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 397   ∨ wo 846  ∀wal 1540   = wceq 1542  ∃wex 1782  [wsb 2068   ∈ wcel 2107  Vcvv 3475  [wsbc 3777

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2138  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2704

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-v 3477  df-sbc 3778

This theorem is referenced by: (None)