| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > sbc2or | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: The disjunction of two equivalences for class substitution does not require a class existence hypothesis. This theorem tells us that there are only 2 possibilities for [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 behavior at proper classes, matching the sbc5 3816 (false) and sbc6 3819 (true) conclusions. This is interesting since dfsbcq 3790 and dfsbcq2 3791 (from which it is derived) do not appear to say anything obvious about proper class behavior. Note that this theorem does not tell us that it is always one or the other at proper classes; it could "flip" between false (the first disjunct) and true (the second disjunct) as a function of some other variable 𝑦 that 𝜑 or 𝐴 may contain. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| sbc2or | ⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | dfsbcq2 3791 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | |
| 2 | eqeq2 2749 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴)) | |
| 3 | 2 | anbi1d 631 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
| 4 | 3 | exbidv 1921 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
| 5 | sb5 2276 | . . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
| 6 | 1, 4, 5 | vtoclbg 3557 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
| 7 | 6 | orcd 874 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))) |
| 8 | pm5.15 1015 | . . 3 ⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
| 9 | vex 3484 | . . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V | |
| 10 | eleq1 2829 | . . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 ∈ V)) | |
| 11 | 9, 10 | mpbii 233 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V) |
| 12 | 11 | adantr 480 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝐴 ∈ V) |
| 13 | 12 | con3i 154 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) |
| 14 | 13 | nexdv 1936 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) |
| 15 | 11 | con3i 154 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐴) |
| 16 | 15 | pm2.21d 121 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)) |
| 17 | 16 | alrimiv 1927 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)) |
| 18 | 14, 17 | 2thd 265 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))) |
| 19 | 18 | bibi2d 342 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))) |
| 20 | 19 | orbi2d 916 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ((([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) ↔ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))))) |
| 21 | 8, 20 | mpbii 233 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))) |
| 22 | 7, 21 | pm2.61i 182 | 1 ⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 ∨ wo 848 ∀wal 1538 = wceq 1540 ∃wex 1779 [wsb 2064 ∈ wcel 2108 Vcvv 3480 [wsbc 3788 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-10 2141 ax-12 2177 ax-ext 2708 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 849 df-tru 1543 df-ex 1780 df-nf 1784 df-sb 2065 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2816 df-v 3482 df-sbc 3789 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |