Theorem sbc2or 3781

Description: The disjunction of two equivalences for class substitution does not require a class existence hypothesis. This theorem tells us that there are only 2 possibilities for [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 behavior at proper classes, matching the sbc5 3800 (false) and sbc6 3802 (true) conclusions. This is interesting since dfsbcq 3774 and dfsbcq2 3775 (from which it is derived) do not appear to say anything obvious about proper class behavior. Note that this theorem does not tell us that it is always one or the other at proper classes; it could "flip" between false (the first disjunct) and true (the second disjunct) as a function of some other variable 𝑦 that 𝜑 or 𝐴 may contain. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbc2or	⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem sbc2or

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfsbcq2 3775	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
2		eqeq2 2833	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
3	2	anbi1d 631	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
4	3	exbidv 1922	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
5		sb5 2276	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
6	1, 4, 5	vtoclbg 3569	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
7	6	orcd 869	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))))
8		pm5.15 1009	. . 3 ⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
9		vex 3497	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
10		eleq1 2900	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 ∈ V))
11	9, 10	mpbii 235	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
12	11	adantr 483	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
13	12	con3i 157	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
14	13	nexdv 1937	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
15	11	con3i 157	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐴)
16	15	pm2.21d 121	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))
17	16	alrimiv 1928	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))
18	14, 17	2thd 267	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
19	18	bibi2d 345	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))))
20	19	orbi2d 912	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ((([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) ↔ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))))
21	8, 20	mpbii 235	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))))
22	7, 21	pm2.61i 184	1 ⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   ∨ wo 843  ∀wal 1535   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1780  [wsb 2069   ∈ wcel 2114  Vcvv 3494  [wsbc 3772

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2793

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-v 3496  df-sbc 3773

This theorem is referenced by: (None)