![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > sbc2or | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: The disjunction of two equivalences for class substitution does not require a class existence hypothesis. This theorem tells us that there are only 2 possibilities for [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 behavior at proper classes, matching the sbc5 3819 (false) and sbc6 3823 (true) conclusions. This is interesting since dfsbcq 3793 and dfsbcq2 3794 (from which it is derived) do not appear to say anything obvious about proper class behavior. Note that this theorem does not tell us that it is always one or the other at proper classes; it could "flip" between false (the first disjunct) and true (the second disjunct) as a function of some other variable 𝑦 that 𝜑 or 𝐴 may contain. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
sbc2or | ⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | dfsbcq2 3794 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | |
2 | eqeq2 2747 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴)) | |
3 | 2 | anbi1d 631 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
4 | 3 | exbidv 1919 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
5 | sb5 2274 | . . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
6 | 1, 4, 5 | vtoclbg 3557 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
7 | 6 | orcd 873 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))) |
8 | pm5.15 1014 | . . 3 ⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
9 | vex 3482 | . . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V | |
10 | eleq1 2827 | . . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 ∈ V)) | |
11 | 9, 10 | mpbii 233 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V) |
12 | 11 | adantr 480 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝐴 ∈ V) |
13 | 12 | con3i 154 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) |
14 | 13 | nexdv 1934 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) |
15 | 11 | con3i 154 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐴) |
16 | 15 | pm2.21d 121 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)) |
17 | 16 | alrimiv 1925 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)) |
18 | 14, 17 | 2thd 265 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))) |
19 | 18 | bibi2d 342 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))) |
20 | 19 | orbi2d 915 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ((([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) ↔ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))))) |
21 | 8, 20 | mpbii 233 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))) |
22 | 7, 21 | pm2.61i 182 | 1 ⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 ∨ wo 847 ∀wal 1535 = wceq 1537 ∃wex 1776 [wsb 2062 ∈ wcel 2106 Vcvv 3478 [wsbc 3791 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1792 ax-4 1806 ax-5 1908 ax-6 1965 ax-7 2005 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-10 2139 ax-12 2175 ax-ext 2706 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-tru 1540 df-ex 1777 df-nf 1781 df-sb 2063 df-clab 2713 df-cleq 2727 df-clel 2814 df-v 3480 df-sbc 3792 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |