Theorem sbc2or 3685

Description: The disjunction of two equivalences for class substitution does not require a class existence hypothesis. This theorem tells us that there are only 2 possibilities for [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 behavior at proper classes, matching the sbc5 3701 (false) and sbc6 3703 (true) conclusions. This is interesting since dfsbcq 3678 and dfsbcq2 3679 (from which it is derived) do not appear to say anything obvious about proper class behavior. Note that this theorem does not tell us that it is always one or the other at proper classes; it could "flip" between false (the first disjunct) and true (the second disjunct) as a function of some other variable 𝑦 that 𝜑 or 𝐴 may contain. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbc2or	⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem sbc2or

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfsbcq2 3679	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
2		eqeq2 2784	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
3	2	anbi1d 621	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
4	3	exbidv 1881	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
5		sb5 2206	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
6	1, 4, 5	vtoclbg 3482	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
7	6	orcd 860	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))))
8		pm5.15 996	. . 3 ⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
9		vex 3413	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
10		eleq1 2848	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 ∈ V))
11	9, 10	mpbii 225	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
12	11	adantr 473	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
13	12	con3i 152	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
14	13	nexdv 1896	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
15	11	con3i 152	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐴)
16	15	pm2.21d 119	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))
17	16	alrimiv 1887	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))
18	14, 17	2thd 257	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
19	18	bibi2d 335	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))))
20	19	orbi2d 900	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ((([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) ↔ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))))
21	8, 20	mpbii 225	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))))
22	7, 21	pm2.61i 177	1 ⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ∨ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 198   ∧ wa 387   ∨ wo 834  ∀wal 1506   = wceq 1508  ∃wex 1743  [wsb 2016   ∈ wcel 2051  Vcvv 3410  [wsbc 3676

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1759  ax-4 1773  ax-5 1870  ax-6 1929  ax-7 1966  ax-8 2053  ax-9 2060  ax-10 2080  ax-12 2107  ax-ext 2745

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 388  df-or 835  df-ex 1744  df-nf 1748  df-sb 2017  df-clab 2754  df-cleq 2766  df-clel 2841  df-v 3412  df-sbc 3677

This theorem is referenced by: (None)