Theorem sbciegft 3807

Description: Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, using a bound-variable hypothesis instead of distinct variables. (Closed theorem version of sbciegf 3809.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by SN, 14-May-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbciegft	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem sbciegft

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbc6g 3800	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
2	1	3ad2ant1 1133	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
3		ceqsalt 3499	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
4	3	3comr 1125	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
5	2, 4	bitrd 279	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ w3a 1086  ∀wal 1538   = wceq 1540  Ⅎwnf 1783   ∈ wcel 2109  [wsbc 3770

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2708

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2810  df-sbc 3771

This theorem is referenced by:  sbciegf  3809  sbciedf  3813