Theorem sbciedf 3784

Description: Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, deduction form. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sbcied.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
sbcied.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
sbciedf.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
sbciedf.4	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbciedf	⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem sbciedf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbcied.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
2		sbciedf.4	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)
3		sbciedf.3	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
4		sbcied.2	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
5	4	ex 412	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))
6	3, 5	alrimi 2216	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))
7		sbciegft 3778	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
8	1, 2, 6, 7	syl3anc 1373	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1539   = wceq 1541  Ⅎwnf 1784   ∈ wcel 2111  [wsbc 3741

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-12 2180  ax-ext 2703

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-sbc 3742

This theorem is referenced by:  sbc2iegf  3816  csbiebt  3879  sbcnestgfw  4371  sbcnestgf  4376  ovmpodxf  7496  sbc2iedf  32442  reuf1odnf  47144  ovmpordxf  48376