P. 39 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 3801-3900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	sbcralt 3801*	Interchange class substitution and restricted quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 22-Feb-2010.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	sbcrext 3802*	Interchange class substitution and restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) (Revised by NM, 18-Aug-2018.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 7-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	sbcralg 3803*	Interchange class substitution and restricted quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	sbcrex 3804*	Interchange class substitution and restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2005.) (Revised by NM, 18-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	sbcreu 3805*	Interchange class substitution and restricted unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2013.) (Revised by NM, 18-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	reu8nf 3806*	Restricted uniqueness using implicit substitution. This version of reu8 3663 uses a nonfreeness hypothesis for 𝑥 and 𝜓 instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	sbcabel 3807*	Interchange class substitution and class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2005.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]{𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝐵 ↔ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	rspsbc 3808*	Restricted quantifier version of Axiom 4 of [Mendelson] p. 69. This provides an axiom for a predicate calculus for a restricted domain. This theorem generalizes the unrestricted stdpc4 2072 and spsbc 3724. See also rspsbca 3809 and rspcsbela 4366. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	rspsbca 3809*	Restricted quantifier version of Axiom 4 of [Mendelson] p. 69. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	rspesbca 3810*	Existence form of rspsbca 3809. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	spesbc 3811	Existence form of spsbc 3724. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	spesbcd 3812	form of spsbc 3724. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	sbcth2 3813*	A substitution into a theorem. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	ra4v 3814*	Version of ra4 3815 with a disjoint variable condition, requiring fewer axioms. This is stdpc5v 1942 for a restricted domain. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	ra4 3815	Restricted quantifier version of Axiom 5 of [Mendelson] p. 69. This is the axiom stdpc5 2204 of standard predicate calculus for a restricted domain. See ra4v 3814 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2004.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	rmo2 3816*	Alternate definition of restricted "at most one". Note that ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 is not equivalent to ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦) (in analogy to reu6 3656); to see this, let 𝐴 be the empty set. However, one direction of this pattern holds; see rmo2i 3817. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	rmo2i 3817*	Condition implying restricted "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rmo3 3818*	Restricted "at most one" using explicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2012.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) Avoid ax-13 2372. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 30-Apr-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	rmob 3819*	Consequence of "at most one", using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2015.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	rmoi 3820*	Consequence of "at most one", using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2012.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	rmob2 3821*	Consequence of "restricted at most one". (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	rmoi2 3822*	Consequence of "restricted at most one". (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐵)
Theorem	rmoanim 3823	Introduction of a conjunct into restricted "at most one" quantifier, analogous to moanim 2622. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jun-2017.) Avoid ax-10 2139 and ax-11 2156. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 24-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	rmoanimALT 3824	Alternate proof of rmoanim 3823, shorter but requiring ax-10 2139 and ax-11 2156. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jun-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	reuan 3825	Introduction of a conjunct into restricted unique existential quantifier, analogous to euan 2623. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	2reu1 3826*	Double restricted existential uniqueness. This theorem shows a condition under which a "naive" definition matches the correct one, analogous to 2eu1 2652. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)))
Theorem	2reu2 3827*	Double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu2 2654. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
2.1.10  Proper substitution of classes for sets into classes
Syntax	csb 3828	Extend class notation to include the proper substitution of a class for a set into another class.
class ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵
Definition	df-csb 3829*	Define the proper substitution of a class for a set into another class. The underlined brackets distinguish it from the substitution into a wff, wsbc 3711, to prevent ambiguity. Theorem sbcel1g 4344 shows an example of how ambiguity could arise if we did not use distinguished brackets. When 𝐴 is a proper class, this evaluates to the empty set (see csbprc 4337). Theorem sbccsb 4364 recovers substitution into a wff from this definition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐵}
Theorem	csb2 3830*	Alternate expression for the proper substitution into a class, without referencing substitution into a wff. Note that 𝑥 can be free in 𝐵 but cannot occur in 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 2-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
Theorem	csbeq1 3831	Analogue of dfsbcq 3713 for proper substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐵 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)
Theorem	csbeq1d 3832	Equality deduction for proper substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐵 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)
Theorem	csbeq2 3833	Substituting into equivalent classes gives equivalent results. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 9-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)
Theorem	csbeq2d 3834	Formula-building deduction for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)
Theorem	csbeq2dv 3835*	Formula-building deduction for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)
Theorem	csbeq2i 3836	Formula-building inference for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶
Theorem	csbeq12dv 3837*	Formula-building inference for class substitution. (Contributed by SN, 3-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐶 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)
Theorem	cbvcsbw 3838*	Change bound variables in a class substitution. Interestingly, this does not require any bound variable conditions on 𝐴. Version of cbvcsb 3839 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2372. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 13-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐶    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐷    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐷
Theorem	cbvcsb 3839	Change bound variables in a class substitution. Interestingly, this does not require any bound variable conditions on 𝐴. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. Use the weaker cbvcsbw 3838 when possible. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 13-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐶    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐷    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐷
Theorem	cbvcsbv 3840*	Change the bound variable of a proper substitution into a class using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐶
Theorem	csbid 3841	Analogue of sbid 2251 for proper substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.)
⊢ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑥⦌𝐴 = 𝐴
Theorem	csbeq1a 3842	Equality theorem for proper substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
Theorem	csbcow 3843*	Composition law for chained substitutions into a class. Version of csbco 3844 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2372. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵
Theorem	csbco 3844*	Composition law for chained substitutions into a class. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. Use the weaker csbcow 3843 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵
Theorem	csbtt 3845	Substitution doesn't affect a constant 𝐵 (in which 𝑥 is not free). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐵)
Theorem	csbconstgf 3846	Substitution doesn't affect a constant 𝐵 (in which 𝑥 is not free). (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐵)
Theorem	csbconstg 3847*	Substitution doesn't affect a constant 𝐵 (in which 𝑥 does not occur). csbconstgf 3846 with distinct variable requirement. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) Avoid ax-12 2173. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 15-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐵)
Theorem	csbconstgOLD 3848*	Obsolete version of csbconstg 3847 as of 15-Oct-2024. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐵)
Theorem	csbgfi 3849	Substitution for a variable not free in a class does not affect it, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 4-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐵
Theorem	csbconstgi 3850*	The proper substitution of a class for a variable in another variable does not modify it, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 30-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = 𝑦
Theorem	nfcsb1d 3851	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
Theorem	nfcsb1 3852	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵
Theorem	nfcsb1v 3853*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵
Theorem	nfcsbd 3854	Deduction version of nfcsb 3856. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. (Contributed by NM, 21-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐵)
Theorem	nfcsbw 3855*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. Version of nfcsb 3856 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2372. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐵
Theorem	nfcsb 3856	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. Use the weaker nfcsbw 3855 when possible. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐵
Theorem	csbhypf 3857*	Introduce an explicit substitution into an implicit substitution hypothesis. See sbhypf 3481 for class substitution version. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	csbiebt 3858*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Closed theorem version of csbiegf 3862.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶) → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	csbiedf 3859*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	csbieb 3860*	Bidirectional conversion between an implicit class substitution hypothesis 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶 and its explicit substitution equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2008.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	csbiebg 3861*	Bidirectional conversion between an implicit class substitution hypothesis 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶 and its explicit substitution equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	csbiegf 3862*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	csbief 3863*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶
Theorem	csbie 3864*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by AV, 2-Dec-2019.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 15-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶
Theorem	csbieOLD 3865*	Obsolete version of csbie 3864 as of 15-Oct-2024. (Contributed by AV, 2-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶
Theorem	csbied 3866*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 15-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	csbiedOLD 3867*	Obsolete version of csbied 3866 as of 15-Oct-2024. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	csbied2 3868*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, deduction form. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = 𝐷)
Theorem	csbie2t 3869*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class (closed form of csbie2 3870). (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐶 = 𝐷)
Theorem	csbie2 3870*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐶 = 𝐷
Theorem	csbie2g 3871*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. This version of csbie 3864 avoids a disjointness condition on 𝑥, 𝐴 and 𝑥, 𝐷 by substituting twice. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐷)
Theorem	cbvrabcsfw 3872*	Version of cbvrabcsf 3876 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2372. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 26-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvralcsf 3873	A more general version of cbvralf 3361 that doesn't require 𝐴 and 𝐵 to be distinct from 𝑥 or 𝑦. Changes bound variables using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrexcsf 3874	A more general version of cbvrexf 3362 that has no distinct variable restrictions. Changes bound variables using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 7-Dec-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvreucsf 3875	A more general version of cbvreuv 3379 that has no distinct variable restrictions. Changes bound variables using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrabcsf 3876	A more general version of cbvrab 3415 with no distinct variable restrictions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvralv2 3877*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted universal quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier domain. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)
Theorem	cbvrexv2 3878*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted existential quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier domain. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)
Theorem	rspc2vd 3879*	Deduction version of 2-variable restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. Notice that the class 𝐷 for the second set variable 𝑦 may depend on the first set variable 𝑥. (Contributed by AV, 29-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐷 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜃 → 𝜓))
2.1.11  Define basic set operations and relations
Syntax	cdif 3880	Extend class notation to include class difference (read: "𝐴 minus 𝐵").
class (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)
Syntax	cun 3881	Extend class notation to include union of two classes (read: "𝐴 union 𝐵").
class (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)
Syntax	cin 3882	Extend class notation to include the intersection of two classes (read: "𝐴 intersect 𝐵").
class (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)
Syntax	wss 3883	Extend wff notation to include the subclass relation. This is read "𝐴 is a subclass of 𝐵 " or "𝐵 includes 𝐴". When 𝐴 exists as a set, it is also read "𝐴 is a subset of 𝐵".
wff 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵
Syntax	wpss 3884	Extend wff notation with proper subclass relation.
wff 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵
Theorem	difjust 3885*	Soundness justification theorem for df-dif 3886. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 27-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
Definition	df-dif 3886*	Define class difference, also called relative complement. Definition 5.12 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 20. For example, ({1, 3} ∖ {1, 8}) = {3} (ex-dif 28688). Contrast this operation with union (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) (df-un 3888) and intersection (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) (df-in 3890). Several notations are used in the literature; we chose the ∖ convention used in Definition 5.3 of [Eisenberg] p. 67 instead of the more common minus sign to reserve the latter for later use in, e.g., arithmetic. We will use the terminology "𝐴 excludes 𝐵 " to mean 𝐴 ∖ 𝐵. We will use "𝐵 is removed from 𝐴 " to mean 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵} i.e. the removal of an element or equivalently the exclusion of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)}
Theorem	unjust 3887*	Soundness justification theorem for df-un 3888. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
Definition	df-un 3888*	Define the union of two classes. Definition 5.6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. For example, ({1, 3} ∪ {1, 8}) = {1, 3, 8} (ex-un 28689). Contrast this operation with difference (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) (df-dif 3886) and intersection (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) (df-in 3890). For an alternate definition in terms of class difference, requiring no dummy variables, see dfun2 4190. For union defined in terms of intersection, see dfun3 4196. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)}
Theorem	injust 3889*	Soundness justification theorem for df-in 3890. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
Definition	df-in 3890*	Define the intersection of two classes. Definition 5.6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. For example, ({1, 3} ∩ {1, 8}) = {1} (ex-in 28690). Contrast this operation with union (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) (df-un 3888) and difference (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) (df-dif 3886). For alternate definitions in terms of class difference, requiring no dummy variables, see dfin2 4191 and dfin4 4198. For intersection defined in terms of union, see dfin3 4197. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)}
Theorem	dfin5 3891*	Alternate definition for the intersection of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵}
Theorem	dfdif2 3892*	Alternate definition of class difference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵}
Theorem	eldif 3893	Expansion of membership in a class difference. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	eldifd 3894	If a class is in one class and not another, it is also in their difference. One-way deduction form of eldif 3893. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶))
Theorem	eldifad 3895	If a class is in the difference of two classes, it is also in the minuend. One-way deduction form of eldif 3893. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	eldifbd 3896	If a class is in the difference of two classes, it is not in the subtrahend. One-way deduction form of eldif 3893. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	elneeldif 3897	The elements of a set difference and the minuend are not equal. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
Theorem	velcomp 3898	Characterization of setvar elements of the complement of a class. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (V ∖ 𝐴) ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	elin 3899	Expansion of membership in an intersection of two classes. Theorem 12 of [Suppes] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶))
2.1.12  Subclasses and subsets
Definition	df-ss 3900	Define the subclass relationship. Exercise 9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. For example, {1, 2} ⊆ {1, 2, 3} (ex-ss 28692). Note that 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴 (proved in ssid 3939). Contrast this relationship with the relationship 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 (as will be defined in df-pss 3902). For a more traditional definition, but requiring a dummy variable, see dfss2 3903. Other possible definitions are given by dfss3 3905, dfss4 4189, sspss 4030, ssequn1 4110, ssequn2 4113, sseqin2 4146, and ssdif0 4294. We prefer the label "ss" ("subset") for ⊆, despite the fact that it applies to classes. It is much more common to refer to this as the subset relation than subclass, especially since most of the time the arguments are in fact sets (and for pragmatic reasons we don't want to need to use different operations for sets). The way set.mm is set up, many things are technically classes despite morally (and provably) being sets, like 1 (cf. df-1 10810 and 1ex 10902) or ℝ ( cf. df-r 10812 and reex 10893). This has to do with the fact that there are no "set expressions": classes are expressions but there are only set variables in set.mm (cf. https://us.metamath.org/downloads/grammar-ambiguity.txt 10893). This is why we use ⊆ both for subclass relations and for subset relations and call it "subset". (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)