P. 39 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 3801-3900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	eqsbc2 3801*	Substitution for the right-hand side in an equality. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 7-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐴))
Theorem	sbc3an 3802	Distribution of class substitution over triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2006.) (Revised by NM, 17-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))
Theorem	sbcel1v 3803*	Class substitution into a membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2018.) Avoid ax-13 2401. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 30-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	sbcel2gv 3804*	Class substitution into a membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐵 / 𝑥]𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	sbcel21v 3805*	Class substitution into a membership relation. One direction of sbcel2gv 3804 that holds for proper classes. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ([𝐵 / 𝑥]𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	sbcimdv 3806*	Substitution analogue of Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90 (alim 1842). (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2005.) (Revised by NM, 17-Aug-2018.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 7-Jul-2021.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 12-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))
Theorem	sbctt 3807	Substitution for a variable not free in a wff does not affect it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	sbcgf 3808	Substitution for a variable not free in a wff does not affect it. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	sbc19.21g 3809	Substitution for a variable not free in antecedent affects only the consequent. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)))
Theorem	sbcg 3810*	Substitution for a variable not occurring in a wff does not affect it. Distinct variable form of sbcgf 3808. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 12-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	sbcgfi 3811	Substitution for a variable not free in a wff does not affect it, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 1-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	sbc2iegf 3812*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	sbc2ie 3813*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.) (Proof shortened by GG, 12-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	sbc2iedv 3814*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Oct-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	sbc3ie 3815*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦][𝐶 / 𝑧]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	sbccomlem 3816*	Lemma for sbccom 3817. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-10 2177, ax-12 2212. (Revised by SN, 20-Aug-2025.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	sbccom 3817*	Commutative law for double class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Oct-2016.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	sbcralt 3818*	Interchange class substitution and restricted quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 22-Feb-2010.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	sbcrext 3819*	Interchange class substitution and restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) (Revised by NM, 18-Aug-2018.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 7-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	sbcralg 3820*	Interchange class substitution and restricted quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	sbcrex 3821*	Interchange class substitution and restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2005.) (Revised by NM, 18-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	sbcreu 3822*	Interchange class substitution and restricted unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2013.) (Revised by NM, 18-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	reu8nf 3823*	Restricted uniqueness using implicit substitution. This version of reu8 3690 uses a nonfreeness hypothesis for 𝑥 and 𝜓 instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	sbcabel 3824*	Interchange class substitution and class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2005.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]{𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝐵 ↔ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	rspsbc 3825*	Restricted quantifier version of Axiom 4 of [Mendelson] p. 69. This provides an axiom for a predicate calculus for a restricted domain. This theorem generalizes the unrestricted stdpc4 2104 and spsbc 3751. See also rspsbca 3826 and rspcsbela 4395. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	rspsbca 3826*	Restricted quantifier version of Axiom 4 of [Mendelson] p. 69. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	rspesbca 3827*	Existence form of rspsbca 3826. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	spesbc 3828	Existence form of spsbc 3751. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	spesbcd 3829	form of spsbc 3751. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	sbcth2 3830*	A substitution into a theorem. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	ra4v 3831*	Version of ra4 3832 with a disjoint variable condition, requiring fewer axioms. This is stdpc5v 1970 for a restricted domain. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	ra4 3832	Restricted quantifier version of Axiom 5 of [Mendelson] p. 69. This is the axiom stdpc5 2244 of standard predicate calculus for a restricted domain. See ra4v 3831 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2004.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	rmo2 3833*	Alternate definition of restricted "at most one". Note that ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 is not equivalent to ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦) (in analogy to reu6 3683); to see this, let 𝐴 be the empty set. However, one direction of this pattern holds; see rmo2i 3834. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	rmo2i 3834*	Condition implying restricted "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rmo3 3835*	Restricted "at most one" using explicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2012.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) Avoid ax-13 2401. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 30-Apr-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	rmob 3836*	Consequence of "at most one", using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2015.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	rmoi 3837*	Consequence of "at most one", using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2012.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	nrmod 3838*	Deduce the negation of a restricted "at most one" quantifier. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Jul-2026.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑌 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	rmob2 3839*	Consequence of "restricted at most one". (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	rmoi2 3840*	Consequence of "restricted at most one". (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐵)
Theorem	rmoanim 3841	Introduction of a conjunct into restricted "at most one" quantifier, analogous to moanim 2645. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jun-2017.) Avoid ax-10 2177 and ax-11 2193. (Revised by GG, 24-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	rmoanimALT 3842	Alternate proof of rmoanim 3841, shorter but requiring ax-10 2177 and ax-11 2193. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jun-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	reuan 3843	Introduction of a conjunct into restricted unique existential quantifier, analogous to euan 2646. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	2reu1 3844*	Double restricted existential uniqueness. This theorem shows a condition under which a "naive" definition matches the correct one, analogous to 2eu1 2675. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)))
Theorem	2reu2 3845*	Double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu2 2677. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
2.1.10  Proper substitution of classes for sets into classes
Syntax	csb 3846	Extend class notation to include the proper substitution of a class for a set into another class.
class ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵
Definition	df-csb 3847*	Define the proper substitution of a class for a set into another class. The underlined brackets distinguish it from the substitution into a wff, wsbc 3738, to prevent ambiguity. Theorem sbcel1g 4373 shows an example of how ambiguity could arise if we did not use distinguished brackets. When 𝐴 is a proper class, this evaluates to the empty set (see csbprc 4366). Theorem sbccsb 4393 recovers substitution into a wff from this definition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐵}
Theorem	csb2 3848*	Alternate expression for the proper substitution into a class, without referencing substitution into a wff. Note that 𝑥 can be free in 𝐵 but cannot occur in 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 2-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
Theorem	csbeq1 3849	Analogue of dfsbcq 3740 for proper substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐵 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)
Theorem	csbeq1d 3850	Equality deduction for proper substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐵 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)
Theorem	csbeq2 3851	Substituting into equivalent classes gives equivalent results. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 9-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)
Theorem	csbeq2d 3852	Formula-building deduction for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)
Theorem	csbeq2dv 3853*	Formula-building deduction for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)
Theorem	csbeq2i 3854	Formula-building inference for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶
Theorem	csbeq12dv 3855*	Formula-building inference for class substitution. (Contributed by SN, 3-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐶 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)
Theorem	cbvcsbw 3856*	Change bound variables in a class substitution. Interestingly, this does not require any bound variable conditions on 𝐴. Version of cbvcsb 3857 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2401. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 13-Sep-2009.) Avoid ax-13 2401. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐶    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐷    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐷
Theorem	cbvcsb 3857	Change bound variables in a class substitution. Interestingly, this does not require any bound variable conditions on 𝐴. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2401. Use the weaker cbvcsbw 3856 when possible. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 13-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐶    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐷    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐷
Theorem	cbvcsbv 3858*	Change the bound variable of a proper substitution into a class using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐶
Theorem	csbid 3859	Analogue of sbid 2290 for proper substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.)
⊢ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑥⦌𝐴 = 𝐴
Theorem	csbeq1a 3860	Equality theorem for proper substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
Theorem	csbcow 3861*	Composition law for chained substitutions into a class. Version of csbco 3862 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2401. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) Avoid ax-13 2401. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵
Theorem	csbco 3862*	Composition law for chained substitutions into a class. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2401. Use the weaker csbcow 3861 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵
Theorem	csbtt 3863	Substitution doesn't affect a constant 𝐵 (in which 𝑥 is not free). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐵)
Theorem	csbconstgf 3864	Substitution doesn't affect a constant 𝐵 (in which 𝑥 is not free). (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐵)
Theorem	csbconstg 3865*	Substitution doesn't affect a constant 𝐵 (in which 𝑥 does not occur). csbconstgf 3864 with distinct variable requirement. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) Avoid ax-12 2212. (Revised by GG, 15-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐵)
Theorem	csbgfi 3866	Substitution for a variable not free in a class does not affect it, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 4-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐵
Theorem	csbconstgi 3867*	The proper substitution of a class for a variable in another variable does not modify it, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 30-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = 𝑦
Theorem	nfcsb1d 3868	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
Theorem	nfcsb1 3869	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵
Theorem	nfcsb1v 3870*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵
Theorem	nfcsbd 3871	Deduction version of nfcsb 3873. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2401. (Contributed by NM, 21-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐵)
Theorem	nfcsbw 3872*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. Version of nfcsb 3873 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2401. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-13 2401. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐵
Theorem	nfcsb 3873	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2401. Use the weaker nfcsbw 3872 when possible. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐵
Theorem	csbhypf 3874*	Introduce an explicit substitution into an implicit substitution hypothesis. See sbhypf 3509 for class substitution version. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	csbiebt 3875*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Closed theorem version of csbiegf 3879.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶) → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	csbiedf 3876*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	csbieb 3877*	Bidirectional conversion between an implicit class substitution hypothesis 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶 and its explicit substitution equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2008.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	csbiebg 3878*	Bidirectional conversion between an implicit class substitution hypothesis 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶 and its explicit substitution equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	csbiegf 3879*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	csbief 3880*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶
Theorem	csbie 3881*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by AV, 2-Dec-2019.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 15-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶
Theorem	csbied 3882*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 15-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	csbied2 3883*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, deduction form. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = 𝐷)
Theorem	csbie2t 3884*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class (closed form of csbie2 3885). (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐶 = 𝐷)
Theorem	csbie2 3885*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐶 = 𝐷
Theorem	csbie2g 3886*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. This version of csbie 3881 avoids a disjointness condition on 𝑥, 𝐴 and 𝑥, 𝐷 by substituting twice. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐷)
Theorem	cbvrabcsfw 3887*	Version of cbvrabcsf 3891 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2401. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.) (Revised by GG, 26-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvralcsf 3888	A more general version of cbvralf 3345 that doesn't require 𝐴 and 𝐵 to be distinct from 𝑥 or 𝑦. Changes bound variables using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2401. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrexcsf 3889	A more general version of cbvrexf 3346 that has no distinct variable restrictions. Changes bound variables using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2401. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 7-Dec-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvreucsf 3890	A more general version of cbvreuv 3407 that has no distinct variable restrictions. Changes bound variables using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2401. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrabcsf 3891	A more general version of cbvrab 3449 with no distinct variable restrictions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2401. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvralv2 3892*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted universal quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier domain. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2401. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)
Theorem	cbvrexv2 3893*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted existential quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier domain. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2401. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)
Theorem	rspc2vd 3894*	Deduction version of 2-variable restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. Notice that the class 𝐷 for the second set variable 𝑦 may depend on the first set variable 𝑥. (Contributed by AV, 29-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐷 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜃 → 𝜓))
2.1.11  Subclasses and subsets, proper subclasses and subsets
2.1.11.1  Subclasses and subsets
Syntax	wss 3895	Syntax for the subclass predicate.
wff 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵
Definition	df-ss 3896*	Define the subclass relationship. Definition 5.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. For example, {1, 2} ⊆ {1, 2, 3} (ex-ss 31028). Note that 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴 (proved in ssid 3930). Contrast this relationship with the relationship 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 (as will be defined in df-pss 4014). For an alternative definition, not requiring a dummy variable, see dfss2 4094. Other possible definitions are given by dfss3 3897, dfss4 4214, sspss 4029, ssequn1 4184, ssequn2 4187, sseqin2 4120, and ssdif0 4313. We prefer the label "ss" ("subset") for ⊆, despite the fact that it applies to classes. It is much more common to refer to this as the subset relation than subclass, especially since most of the time the arguments are in fact sets (and for pragmatic reasons we don't want to need to use different operations for sets). The way set.mm is set up, many things are technically classes despite morally (and provably) being sets, like 1 (cf. df-1 11208 and 1ex 11303) or ℝ ( cf. df-r 11210 and reex 11291). This has to do with the fact that there are no "set expressions": classes are expressions but there are only set variables in set.mm (cf. https://us.metamath.org/downloads/grammar-ambiguity.txt 11291). This is why we use ⊆ both for subclass relations and for subset relations and call it "subset". (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.) Revised from the original definition dfss2 4094. (Revised by GG, 15-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	dfss3 3897*	Alternate definition of subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	dfss6 3898*	Alternate definition of subclass relationship. (Contributed by RP, 16-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	dfssf 3899	Equivalence for subclass relation, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-1994.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-13 2401. (Revised by GG, 19-May-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	dfss3f 3900	Equivalence for subclass relation, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2004.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)