Theorem ssdf 42625

Description: A sufficient condition for a subclass relationship. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Jan-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ssdf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
ssdf.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssdf	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ssdf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssdf.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		ssdf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
3	2	ex 413	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4	1, 3	ralrimi 3141	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
5		dfss3 3909	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
6	4, 5	sylibr 233	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396  Ⅎwnf 1786   ∈ wcel 2106  ∀wral 3064   ⊆ wss 3887

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-ral 3069  df-v 3434  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904

This theorem is referenced by:  ssd  42630  smfaddlem2  44299  smfadd  44300  smfmullem4  44328  smfmul  44329  smflimsuplem4  44356