Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Alan Sare < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  sspwimpcfVD Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem sspwimpcfVD 41255
Description: The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 40903) using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. It was completed automatically by a tools program which would invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sspwimpcf 41254 is sspwimpcfVD 41255 without virtual deductions and was derived from sspwimpcfVD 41255. The version of completeusersproof.cmd used is capable of only generating conjunction-form unification theorems, not unification deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
1:: (   𝐴𝐵   ▶   𝐴𝐵   )
2:: (   ........... 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴    ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )
3:2: (   ........... 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴    ▶   𝑥𝐴   )
4:3,1: (   (   𝐴𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥𝐵   )
5:: 𝑥 ∈ V
6:4,5: (   (   𝐴𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵    )
7:6: (   𝐴𝐵   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)    )
8:7: (   𝐴𝐵   ▶   𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴𝑥 𝒫 𝐵)   )
9:8: (   𝐴𝐵   ▶   𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵   )
qed:9: (𝐴𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
Assertion
Ref Expression
sspwimpcfVD (𝐴𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem sspwimpcfVD
Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 vex 3497 . . . . . 6 𝑥 ∈ V
2 idn1 40908 . . . . . . 7 (   𝐴𝐵   ▶   𝐴𝐵   )
3 idn1 40908 . . . . . . . 8 (   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )
4 elpwi 4547 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴𝑥𝐴)
53, 4el1 40962 . . . . . . 7 (   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   ▶   𝑥𝐴   )
6 sstr2 3973 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑥𝐴 → (𝐴𝐵𝑥𝐵))
76impcom 410 . . . . . . 7 ((𝐴𝐵𝑥𝐴) → 𝑥𝐵)
82, 5, 7el12 41060 . . . . . 6 (   (   𝐴𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥𝐵   )
9 elpwg 4541 . . . . . . 7 (𝑥 ∈ V → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵𝑥𝐵))
109biimpar 480 . . . . . 6 ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
111, 8, 10el021old 41035 . . . . 5 (   (   𝐴𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵   )
1211int2 40940 . . . 4 (   𝐴𝐵   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)   )
1312gen11 40950 . . 3 (   𝐴𝐵   ▶   𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)   )
14 dfss2 3954 . . . 4 (𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵))
1514biimpri 230 . . 3 (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
1613, 15el1 40962 . 2 (   𝐴𝐵   ▶   𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵   )
1716in1 40905 1 (𝐴𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wal 1531  wcel 2110  Vcvv 3494  wss 3935  𝒫 cpw 4538
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2793
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-v 3496  df-in 3942  df-ss 3951  df-pw 4540  df-vd1 40904  df-vhc2 40915
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator