Theorem sspwimpcfVD 45347

Description: The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44996) using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. It was completed automatically by a tools program which would invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sspwimpcf 45346 is sspwimpcfVD 45347 without virtual deductions and was derived from sspwimpcfVD 45347. The version of completeusersproof.cmd used is capable of only generating conjunction-form unification theorems, not unification deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   )
2::	⊢ (   ........... 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴    ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )
3:2:	⊢ (   ........... 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴    ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴   )
4:3,1:	⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵   )
5::	⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
6:4,5:	⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵    )
7:6:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)    )
8:7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)   )
9:8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵   )
qed:9:	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sspwimpcfVD	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem sspwimpcfVD

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3433	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
2		idn1 45001	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   )
3		idn1 45001	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )
4		elpwi 4548	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
5	3, 4	el1 45055	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴   )
6		sstr2 3928	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
7	6	impcom 407	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)
8	2, 5, 7	el12 45152	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵   )
9		elpwg 4544	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
10	9	biimpar 477	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
11	1, 8, 10	el021old 45128	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵   )
12	11	int2 45033	. . . 4 ⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)   )
13	12	gen11 45043	. . 3 ⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)   )
14		df-ss 3906	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵))
15	14	biimpri 228	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
16	13, 15	el1 45055	. 2 ⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵   )
17	16	in1 44998	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1540   ∈ wcel 2114  Vcvv 3429   ⊆ wss 3889  𝒫 cpw 4541

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2708

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-v 3431  df-ss 3906  df-pw 4543  df-vd1 44997  df-vhc2 45008

This theorem is referenced by: (None)