P. 442 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 44101-44200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	e3bir 44101	Right biconditional form of e3 44099. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜏   )
Theorem	e03 44102	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee03 44103	e03 44102 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e03an 44104	Conjunction form of e03 44102. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee03an 44105	Conjunction form of ee03 44103. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e30 44106	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ 𝜏    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee30 44107	e30 44106 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ 𝜏    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e30an 44108	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ 𝜏    &   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee30an 44109	Conjunction form of ee30 44107. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ 𝜏    &   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e13 44110	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	e13an 44111	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee13an 44112	e13an 44111 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e31 44113	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee31 44114	e31 44113 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e31an 44115	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee31an 44116	e31an 44115 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e23 44117	A virtual deduction elimination rule (see syl10 79). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	e23an 44118	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee23an 44119	e23an 44118 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e32 44120	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee32 44121	e32 44120 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e32an 44122	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee32an 44123	e33an 44097 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e123 44124	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜏   ▶   𝜂   )    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜏   ▶   𝜁   )
Theorem	ee123 44125	e123 44124 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜁)))
Theorem	el123 44126	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜏   ▶   𝜂   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜁)    ⇒   ⊢ (   (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜏   )   ▶   𝜁   )
Theorem	e233 44127	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 29-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜂   )    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜁   )
Theorem	e323 44128	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜂   )    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜁   )
Theorem	e000 44129	A virtual deduction elimination rule. The non-virtual deduction form of e000 44129 is the virtual deduction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜃
Theorem	e00 44130	Elimination rule identical to mp2 9. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is mp2 9. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜒
Theorem	e00an 44131	Elimination rule identical to mp2an 691. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is mp2an 691. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜒
Theorem	eel00cT 44132	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜒)
Theorem	eelTT 44133	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜒
Theorem	e0a 44134	Elimination rule identical to ax-mp 5. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is ax-mp 5. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	eelT 44135	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 5-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	eel0cT 44136	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓)
Theorem	eelT0 44137	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜒
Theorem	e0bi 44138	Elimination rule identical to mpbi 229. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is mpbi 229. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	e0bir 44139	Elimination rule identical to mpbir 230. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is mpbir 230. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	uun0.1 44140	Convention notation form of un0.1 44141. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃)
Theorem	un0.1 44141	⊤ is the constant true, a tautology (see df-tru 1537). Kleene's "empty conjunction" is logically equivalent to ⊤. In a virtual deduction we shall interpret ⊤ to be the empty wff or the empty collection of virtual hypotheses. ⊤ in a virtual deduction translated into conventional notation we shall interpret to be Kleene's empty conjunction. If 𝜃 is true given the empty collection of virtual hypotheses and another collection of virtual hypotheses, then it is true given only the other collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   ⊤   ▶   𝜑   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜓   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ (   (   ⊤   ,   𝜓   )   ▶   𝜃   )    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜓   ▶   𝜃   )
Theorem	uunT1 44142	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) Proof was revised to accommodate a possible future version of df-tru 1537. (Revised by David A. Wheeler, 8-May-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((⊤ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	uunT1p1 44143	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⊤) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	uunT21 44144	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((⊤ ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	uun121 44145	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	uun121p1 44146	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	uun132 44147	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	uun132p1 44148	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	anabss7p1 44149	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. This would have been named uun221 if the zeroth permutation did not exist in set.mm as anabss7 672. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)
Theorem	un10 44150	A unionizing deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   (   𝜑   ,   ⊤   )   ▶   𝜓   )    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )
Theorem	un01 44151	A unionizing deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   (   ⊤   ,   𝜑   )   ▶   𝜓   )    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )
Theorem	un2122 44152	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	uun2131 44153	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	uun2131p1 44154	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	uunTT1 44155	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((⊤ ∧ ⊤ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	uunTT1p1 44156	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((⊤ ∧ 𝜑 ∧ ⊤) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	uunTT1p2 44157	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⊤ ∧ ⊤) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	uunT11 44158	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((⊤ ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	uunT11p1 44159	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⊤ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	uunT11p2 44160	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ ⊤) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	uunT12 44161	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((⊤ ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	uunT12p1 44162	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((⊤ ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	uunT12p2 44163	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⊤ ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	uunT12p3 44164	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ ⊤ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	uunT12p4 44165	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ ⊤) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	uunT12p5 44166	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ ⊤) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	uun111 44167	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	3anidm12p1 44168	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. 3anidm12 1417 denotes the deduction which would have been named uun112 if it did not pre-exist in set.mm. This second permutation's name is based on this pre-existing name. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	3anidm12p2 44169	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	uun123 44170	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	uun123p1 44171	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	uun123p2 44172	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	uun123p3 44173	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	uun123p4 44174	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	uun2221 44175	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-Dec-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑)) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)
Theorem	uun2221p1 44176	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)
Theorem	uun2221p2 44177	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)
Theorem	3impdirp1 44178	A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. Commuted version of 3impdir 1349. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)
Theorem	3impcombi 44179	A 1-hypothesis propositional calculus deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
21.39.6  Theorems proved using Virtual Deduction
Theorem	trsspwALT 44180	Virtual deduction proof of the left-to-right implication of dftr4 5266. A transitive class is a subset of its power class. This proof corresponds to the virtual deduction proof of dftr4 5266 without accumulating results. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 29-Apr-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	trsspwALT2 44181	Virtual deduction proof of trsspwALT 44180. This proof is the same as the proof of trsspwALT 44180 except each virtual deduction symbol is replaced by its non-virtual deduction symbol equivalent. A transitive class is a subset of its power class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	trsspwALT3 44182	Short predicate calculus proof of the left-to-right implication of dftr4 5266. A transitive class is a subset of its power class. This proof was constructed by applying Metamath's minimize command to the proof of trsspwALT2 44181, which is the virtual deduction proof trsspwALT 44180 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-Apr-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	sspwtr 44183	Virtual deduction proof of the right-to-left implication of dftr4 5266. A class which is a subclass of its power class is transitive. This proof corresponds to the virtual deduction proof of sspwtr 44183 without accumulating results. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 2-May-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴)
Theorem	sspwtrALT 44184	Virtual deduction proof of sspwtr 44183. This proof is the same as the proof of sspwtr 44183 except each virtual deduction symbol is replaced by its non-virtual deduction symbol equivalent. A class which is a subclass of its power class is transitive. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-May-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴)
Theorem	sspwtrALT2 44185	Short predicate calculus proof of the right-to-left implication of dftr4 5266. A class which is a subclass of its power class is transitive. This proof was constructed by applying Metamath's minimize command to the proof of sspwtrALT 44184, which is the virtual deduction proof sspwtr 44183 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-May-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴)
Theorem	pwtrVD 44186	Virtual deduction proof of pwtr 5448; see pwtrrVD 44187 for the converse. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	pwtrrVD 44187	Virtual deduction proof of pwtr 5448; see pwtrVD 44186 for the converse. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (Tr 𝒫 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴)
Theorem	suctrALT 44188	The successor of a transitive class is transitive. The proof of https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctrvd.html is a Virtual Deduction proof verified by automatically transforming it into the Metamath proof of suctrALT 44188 using completeusersproof, which is verified by the Metamath program. The proof of https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctrro.html 44188 is a form of the completed proof which preserves the Virtual Deduction proof's step numbers and their ordering. See suctr 6449 for the original proof. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Apr-2009.) (Revised by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)
Theorem	snssiALTVD 44189	Virtual deduction proof of snssiALT 44190. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → {𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	snssiALT 44190	If a class is an element of another class, then its singleton is a subclass of that other class. Alternate proof of snssi 4807. This theorem was automatically generated from snssiALTVD 44189 using a translation program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → {𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	snsslVD 44191	Virtual deduction proof of snssl 44192. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	snssl 44192	If a singleton is a subclass of another class, then the singleton's element is an element of that other class. This theorem is the right-to-left implication of the biconditional snss 4785. The proof of this theorem was automatically generated from snsslVD 44191 using a tools command file, translateMWO.cmd, by translating the proof into its non-virtual deduction form and minimizing it. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	snelpwrVD 44193	Virtual deduction proof of snelpwi 5439. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → {𝐴} ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	unipwrVD 44194	Virtual deduction proof of unipwr 44195. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝒫 𝐴
Theorem	unipwr 44195	A class is a subclass of the union of its power class. This theorem is the right-to-left subclass lemma of unipw 5446. The proof of this theorem was automatically generated from unipwrVD 44194 using a tools command file , translateMWO.cmd , by translating the proof into its non-virtual deduction form and minimizing it. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝒫 𝐴
Theorem	sstrALT2VD 44196	Virtual deduction proof of sstrALT2 44197. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	sstrALT2 44197	Virtual deduction proof of sstr 3986, transitivity of subclasses, Theorem 6 of [Suppes] p. 23. This theorem was automatically generated from sstrALT2VD 44196 using the command file translate_without_overwriting.cmd . It was not minimized because the automated minimization excluding duplicates generates a minimized proof which, although not directly containing any duplicates, indirectly contains a duplicate. That is, the trace back of the minimized proof contains a duplicate. This is undesirable because some step(s) of the minimized proof use the proven theorem. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	suctrALT2VD 44198	Virtual deduction proof of suctrALT2 44199. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)
Theorem	suctrALT2 44199	Virtual deduction proof of suctr 6449. The sucessor of a transitive class is transitive. This proof was generated automatically from the virtual deduction proof suctrALT2VD 44198 using the tools command file translate_without_overwriting_minimize_excluding_duplicates.cmd . (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)
Theorem	elex2VD 44200*	Virtual deduction proof of elex2 2807. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)