P. 442 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 44101-44200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	dfrcl2 44101	Reflexive closure of a relation as union with restricted identity relation. (Contributed by RP, 6-Jun-2020.)
⊢ r* = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (( I ↾ (dom 𝑥 ∪ ran 𝑥)) ∪ 𝑥))
Theorem	dfrcl3 44102	Reflexive closure of a relation as union of powers of the relation. (Contributed by RP, 6-Jun-2020.)
⊢ r* = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑥↑𝑟0) ∪ (𝑥↑𝑟1)))
Theorem	dfrcl4 44103*	Reflexive closure of a relation as indexed union of powers of the relation. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jun-2020.)
⊢ r* = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ {0, 1} (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))
21.36.5.3  Finite relationship composition In order for theorems on the transitive closure of a relation to be grouped together before the concept of continuity, we really need an analogue of ↑𝑟 that works on finite ordinals or finite sets instead of natural numbers.
Theorem	relexp2 44104	A set operated on by the relation exponent to the second power is equal to the composition of the set with itself. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅↑𝑟2) = (𝑅 ∘ 𝑅))
Theorem	relexpnul 44105	If the domain and range of powers of a relation are disjoint then the relation raised to the sum of those exponents is empty. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)) → ((dom (𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ∩ ran (𝑅↑𝑟𝑀)) = ∅ ↔ (𝑅↑𝑟(𝑁 + 𝑀)) = ∅))
Theorem	eliunov2 44106*	Membership in the indexed union over operator values where the index varies the second input is equivalent to the existence of at least one index such that the element is a member of that operator value. Generalized from dfrtrclrec2 15020. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑟 ↑ 𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐶‘𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 𝑋 ∈ (𝑅 ↑ 𝑛)))
Theorem	eltrclrec 44107*	Membership in the indexed union of relation exponentiation over the natural numbers is equivalent to the existence of at least one number such that the element is a member of that relationship power. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐶‘𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑅↑𝑟𝑛)))
Theorem	elrtrclrec 44108*	Membership in the indexed union of relation exponentiation over the natural numbers (including zero) is equivalent to the existence of at least one number such that the element is a member of that relationship power. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐶‘𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝑋 ∈ (𝑅↑𝑟𝑛)))
Theorem	briunov2 44109*	Two classes related by the indexed union over operator values where the index varies the second input is equivalent to the existence of at least one index such that the two classes are related by that operator value. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑟 ↑ 𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋(𝐶‘𝑅)𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 𝑋(𝑅 ↑ 𝑛)𝑌))
Theorem	brmptiunrelexpd 44110*	If two elements are connected by an indexed union of relational powers, then they are connected via 𝑛 instances the relation, for some 𝑛. Generalization of dfrtrclrec2 15020. (Contributed by RP, 21-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ⊆ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(𝐶‘𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 𝐴(𝑅↑𝑟𝑛)𝐵))
Theorem	fvmptiunrelexplb0d 44111*	If the indexed union ranges over the zeroth power of the relation, then a restriction of the identity relation is a subset of the appliction of the function to the relation. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( I ↾ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ⊆ (𝐶‘𝑅))
Theorem	fvmptiunrelexplb0da 44112*	If the indexed union ranges over the zeroth power of the relation, then a restriction of the identity relation is a subset of the appliction of the function to the relation. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ⊆ (𝐶‘𝑅))
Theorem	fvmptiunrelexplb1d 44113*	If the indexed union ranges over the first power of the relation, then the relation is a subset of the appliction of the function to the relation. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ∈ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐶‘𝑅))
Theorem	brfvid 44114	If two elements are connected by a value of the identity relation, then they are connected via the argument. (Contributed by RP, 21-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴( I ‘𝑅)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	brfvidRP 44115	If two elements are connected by a value of the identity relation, then they are connected via the argument. This is an example which uses brmptiunrelexpd 44110. (Contributed by RP, 21-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴( I ‘𝑅)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	fvilbd 44116	A set is a subset of its image under the identity relation. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ ( I ‘𝑅))
Theorem	fvilbdRP 44117	A set is a subset of its image under the identity relation. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ ( I ‘𝑅))
Theorem	brfvrcld 44118	If two elements are connected by the reflexive closure of a relation, then they are connected via zero or one instances the relation. (Contributed by RP, 21-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(r*‘𝑅)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴(𝑅↑𝑟0)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴(𝑅↑𝑟1)𝐵)))
Theorem	brfvrcld2 44119	If two elements are connected by the reflexive closure of a relation, then they are equal or related by relation. (Contributed by RP, 21-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(r*‘𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅) ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴𝑅𝐵)))
Theorem	fvrcllb0d 44120	A restriction of the identity relation is a subset of the reflexive closure of a set. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( I ↾ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ⊆ (r*‘𝑅))
Theorem	fvrcllb0da 44121	A restriction of the identity relation is a subset of the reflexive closure of a relation. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ⊆ (r*‘𝑅))
Theorem	fvrcllb1d 44122	A set is a subset of its image under the reflexive closure. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (r*‘𝑅))
Theorem	brtrclrec 44123*	Two classes related by the indexed union of relation exponentiation over the natural numbers is equivalent to the existence of at least one number such that the two classes are related by that relationship power. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋(𝐶‘𝑅)𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝑋(𝑅↑𝑟𝑛)𝑌))
Theorem	brrtrclrec 44124*	Two classes related by the indexed union of relation exponentiation over the natural numbers (including zero) is equivalent to the existence of at least one number such that the two classes are related by that relationship power. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋(𝐶‘𝑅)𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝑋(𝑅↑𝑟𝑛)𝑌))
Theorem	briunov2uz 44125*	Two classes related by the indexed union over operator values where the index varies the second input is equivalent to the existence of at least one index such that the two classes are related by that operator value. The index set 𝑁 is restricted to an upper range of integers. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑟 ↑ 𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑁 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝑋(𝐶‘𝑅)𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 𝑋(𝑅 ↑ 𝑛)𝑌))
Theorem	eliunov2uz 44126*	Membership in the indexed union over operator values where the index varies the second input is equivalent to the existence of at least one index such that the element is a member of that operator value. The index set 𝑁 is restricted to an upper range of integers. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑟 ↑ 𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑁 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐶‘𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 𝑋 ∈ (𝑅 ↑ 𝑛)))
Theorem	ov2ssiunov2 44127*	Any particular operator value is the subset of the index union over a set of operator values. Generalized from rtrclreclem1 15019 and rtrclreclem2 . (Contributed by RP, 4-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑟 ↑ 𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑁) → (𝑅 ↑ 𝑀) ⊆ (𝐶‘𝑅))
Theorem	relexp0eq 44128	The zeroth power of relationships is the same if and only if the union of their domain and ranges is the same. (Contributed by RP, 11-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → ((dom 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐴) = (dom 𝐵 ∪ ran 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴↑𝑟0) = (𝐵↑𝑟0)))
Theorem	iunrelexp0 44129*	Simplification of zeroth power of indexed union of powers of relations. (Contributed by RP, 19-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ ℕ0 ∧ ({0, 1} ∩ 𝑍) ≠ ∅) → (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑍 (𝑅↑𝑟𝑥)↑𝑟0) = (𝑅↑𝑟0))
Theorem	relexpxpnnidm 44130	Any positive power of a Cartesian product of non-disjoint sets is itself. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐵)↑𝑟𝑁) = (𝐴 × 𝐵)))
Theorem	relexpiidm 44131	Any power of any restriction of the identity relation is itself. (Contributed by RP, 12-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (( I ↾ 𝐴)↑𝑟𝑁) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	relexpss1d 44132	The relational power of a subset is a subset. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑟𝑁) ⊆ (𝐵↑𝑟𝑁))
Theorem	comptiunov2i 44133*	The composition two indexed unions is sometimes a similar indexed union. (Contributed by RP, 10-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑎 ↑ 𝑖))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑏 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑏 ↑ 𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑐 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐾 (𝑐 ↑ 𝑘))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐽 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐼 ∪ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑑 ↑ 𝑘) ⊆ ∪ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (∪ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑑 ↑ 𝑗) ↑ 𝑖)    &   ⊢ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑑 ↑ 𝑘) ⊆ ∪ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (∪ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑑 ↑ 𝑗) ↑ 𝑖)    &   ⊢ ∪ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (∪ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑑 ↑ 𝑗) ↑ 𝑖) ⊆ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ (𝐼 ∪ 𝐽)(𝑑 ↑ 𝑘)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∘ 𝑌) = 𝑍
Theorem	corclrcl 44134	The reflexive closure is idempotent. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (r* ∘ r*) = r*
Theorem	iunrelexpmin1 44135*	The indexed union of relation exponentiation over the natural numbers is the minimum transitive relation that includes the relation. (Contributed by RP, 4-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 = ℕ) → ∀𝑠((𝑅 ⊆ 𝑠 ∧ (𝑠 ∘ 𝑠) ⊆ 𝑠) → (𝐶‘𝑅) ⊆ 𝑠))
Theorem	relexpmulnn 44136	With exponents limited to the counting numbers, the composition of powers of a relation is the relation raised to the product of exponents. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = (𝐽 · 𝐾)) ∧ (𝐽 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)) → ((𝑅↑𝑟𝐽)↑𝑟𝐾) = (𝑅↑𝑟𝐼))
Theorem	relexpmulg 44137	With ordered exponents, the composition of powers of a relation is the relation raised to the product of exponents. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = (𝐽 · 𝐾) ∧ (𝐼 = 0 → 𝐽 ≤ 𝐾)) ∧ (𝐽 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)) → ((𝑅↑𝑟𝐽)↑𝑟𝐾) = (𝑅↑𝑟𝐼))
Theorem	trclrelexplem 44138*	The union of relational powers to positive multiples of 𝑁 is a subset to the transitive closure raised to the power of 𝑁. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∪ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐷↑𝑟𝑘)↑𝑟𝑁) ⊆ (∪ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ (𝐷↑𝑟𝑗)↑𝑟𝑁))
Theorem	iunrelexpmin2 44139*	The indexed union of relation exponentiation over the natural numbers (including zero) is the minimum reflexive-transitive relation that includes the relation. (Contributed by RP, 4-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 = ℕ0) → ∀𝑠((( I ↾ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑠 ∧ (𝑠 ∘ 𝑠) ⊆ 𝑠) → (𝐶‘𝑅) ⊆ 𝑠))
Theorem	relexp01min 44140	With exponents limited to 0 and 1, the composition of powers of a relation is the relation raised to the minimum of exponents. (Contributed by RP, 12-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = if(𝐽 < 𝐾, 𝐽, 𝐾)) ∧ (𝐽 ∈ {0, 1} ∧ 𝐾 ∈ {0, 1})) → ((𝑅↑𝑟𝐽)↑𝑟𝐾) = (𝑅↑𝑟𝐼))
Theorem	relexp1idm 44141	Repeated raising a relation to the first power is idempotent. (Contributed by RP, 12-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑅↑𝑟1)↑𝑟1) = (𝑅↑𝑟1))
Theorem	relexp0idm 44142	Repeated raising a relation to the zeroth power is idempotent. (Contributed by RP, 12-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑅↑𝑟0)↑𝑟0) = (𝑅↑𝑟0))
Theorem	relexp0a 44143	Absorption law for zeroth power of a relation. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴↑𝑟𝑁)↑𝑟0) ⊆ (𝐴↑𝑟0))
Theorem	relexpxpmin 44144	The composition of powers of a Cartesian product of non-disjoint sets is the Cartesian product raised to the minimum exponent. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ≠ ∅) ∧ (𝐼 = if(𝐽 < 𝐾, 𝐽, 𝐾) ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)) → (((𝐴 × 𝐵)↑𝑟𝐽)↑𝑟𝐾) = ((𝐴 × 𝐵)↑𝑟𝐼))
Theorem	relexpaddss 44145	The composition of two powers of a relation is a subset of the relation raised to the sum of those exponents. This is equality where 𝑅 is a relation as shown by relexpaddd 15016 or when the sum of the powers isn't 1 as shown by relexpaddg 15015. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ∘ (𝑅↑𝑟𝑀)) ⊆ (𝑅↑𝑟(𝑁 + 𝑀)))
Theorem	iunrelexpuztr 44146*	The indexed union of relation exponentiation over upper integers is a transive relation. Generalized from rtrclreclem3 15022. (Contributed by RP, 4-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐶‘𝑅) ∘ (𝐶‘𝑅)) ⊆ (𝐶‘𝑅))
21.36.5.4  Transitive closure of a relation
Theorem	dftrcl3 44147*	Transitive closure of a relation, expressed as indexed union of powers of relations. (Contributed by RP, 5-Jun-2020.)
⊢ t+ = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))
Theorem	brfvtrcld 44148*	If two elements are connected by the transitive closure of a relation, then they are connected via 𝑛 instances the relation, for some counting number 𝑛. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝐴(𝑅↑𝑟𝑛)𝐵))
Theorem	fvtrcllb1d 44149	A set is a subset of its image under the transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (t+‘𝑅))
Theorem	trclfvcom 44150	The transitive closure of a relation commutes with the relation. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ((t+‘𝑅) ∘ 𝑅) = (𝑅 ∘ (t+‘𝑅)))
Theorem	cnvtrclfv 44151	The converse of the transitive closure is equal to the transitive closure of the converse relation. (Contributed by RP, 19-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ◡(t+‘𝑅) = (t+‘◡𝑅))
Theorem	cotrcltrcl 44152	The transitive closure is idempotent. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (t+ ∘ t+) = t+
Theorem	trclimalb2 44153	Lower bound for image under a transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑅 “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝐵) → ((t+‘𝑅) “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	brtrclfv2 44154*	Two ways to indicate two elements are related by the transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 ↔ 𝑌 ∈ ∩ {𝑓 ∣ (𝑅 “ ({𝑋} ∪ 𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑓}))
Theorem	trclfvdecomr 44155	The transitive closure of a relation may be decomposed into a union of the relation and the composition of the relation with its transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (t+‘𝑅) = (𝑅 ∪ ((t+‘𝑅) ∘ 𝑅)))
Theorem	trclfvdecoml 44156	The transitive closure of a relation may be decomposed into a union of the relation and the composition of the relation with its transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (t+‘𝑅) = (𝑅 ∪ (𝑅 ∘ (t+‘𝑅))))
Theorem	dmtrclfvRP 44157	The domain of the transitive closure is equal to the domain of the relation. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → dom (t+‘𝑅) = dom 𝑅)
Theorem	rntrclfvRP 44158	The range of the transitive closure is equal to the range of the relation. (Contributed by RP, 19-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ran (t+‘𝑅) = ran 𝑅)
Theorem	rntrclfv 44159	The range of the transitive closure is equal to the range of the relation. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ran (t+‘𝑅) = ran 𝑅)
Theorem	dfrtrcl3 44160*	Reflexive-transitive closure of a relation, expressed as indexed union of powers of relations. Generalized from dfrtrcl2 15024. (Contributed by RP, 5-Jun-2020.)
⊢ t* = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))
Theorem	brfvrtrcld 44161*	If two elements are connected by the reflexive-transitive closure of a relation, then they are connected via 𝑛 instances the relation, for some natural number 𝑛. Similar of dfrtrclrec2 15020. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t*‘𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝐴(𝑅↑𝑟𝑛)𝐵))
Theorem	fvrtrcllb0d 44162	A restriction of the identity relation is a subset of the reflexive-transitive closure of a set. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( I ↾ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ⊆ (t*‘𝑅))
Theorem	fvrtrcllb0da 44163	A restriction of the identity relation is a subset of the reflexive-transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ⊆ (t*‘𝑅))
Theorem	fvrtrcllb1d 44164	A set is a subset of its image under the reflexive-transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (t*‘𝑅))
Theorem	dfrtrcl4 44165	Reflexive-transitive closure of a relation, expressed as the union of the zeroth power and the transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 5-Jun-2020.)
⊢ t* = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑟↑𝑟0) ∪ (t+‘𝑟)))
Theorem	corcltrcl 44166	The composition of the reflexive and transitive closures is the reflexive-transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (r* ∘ t+) = t*
Theorem	cortrcltrcl 44167	Composition with the reflexive-transitive closure absorbs the transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (t* ∘ t+) = t*
Theorem	corclrtrcl 44168	Composition with the reflexive-transitive closure absorbs the reflexive closure. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (r* ∘ t*) = t*
Theorem	cotrclrcl 44169	The composition of the reflexive and transitive closures is the reflexive-transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 21-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (t+ ∘ r*) = t*
Theorem	cortrclrcl 44170	Composition with the reflexive-transitive closure absorbs the reflexive closure. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (t* ∘ r*) = t*
Theorem	cotrclrtrcl 44171	Composition with the reflexive-transitive closure absorbs the transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (t+ ∘ t*) = t*
Theorem	cortrclrtrcl 44172	The reflexive-transitive closure is idempotent. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (t* ∘ t*) = t*
21.36.5.5  Adapted from Frege Theorems inspired by Begriffsschrift without restricting form and content to closely parallel those in [Frege1879].
Theorem	frege77d 44173	If the images of both {𝐴} and 𝑈 are subsets of 𝑈 and 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then 𝐵 is an element of 𝑈. Similar to Proposition 77 of [Frege1879] p. 62. Compare with frege77 44367. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	frege81d 44174	If the image of 𝑈 is a subset 𝑈, 𝐴 is an element of 𝑈 and 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then 𝐵 is an element of 𝑈. Similar to Proposition 81 of [Frege1879] p. 63. Compare with frege81 44371. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	frege83d 44175	If the image of the union of 𝑈 and 𝑉 is a subset of the union of 𝑈 and 𝑉, 𝐴 is an element of 𝑈 and 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then 𝐵 is an element of the union of 𝑈 and 𝑉. Similar to Proposition 83 of [Frege1879] p. 65. Compare with frege83 44373. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ (𝑈 ∪ 𝑉)) ⊆ (𝑈 ∪ 𝑉))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝑈 ∪ 𝑉))
Theorem	frege96d 44176	If 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 follows 𝐶 in 𝑅, then 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 96 of [Frege1879] p. 71. Compare with frege96 44386. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)
Theorem	frege87d 44177	If the images of both {𝐴} and 𝑈 are subsets of 𝑈 and 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 follows 𝐶 in 𝑅, then 𝐵 is an element of 𝑈. Similar to Proposition 87 of [Frege1879] p. 66. Compare with frege87 44377. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	frege91d 44178	If 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in 𝑅 then 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 91 of [Frege1879] p. 68. Comparw with frege91 44381. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)
Theorem	frege97d 44179	If 𝐴 contains all elements after those in 𝑈 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then the image under 𝑅 of 𝐴 is a subclass of 𝐴. Similar to Proposition 97 of [Frege1879] p. 71. Compare with frege97 44387. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((t+‘𝑅) “ 𝑈))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	frege98d 44180	If 𝐶 follows 𝐴 and 𝐵 follows 𝐶 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 98 of [Frege1879] p. 71. Compare with frege98 44388. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)
Theorem	frege102d 44181	If either 𝐴 and 𝐶 are the same or 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 is the successor to 𝐶, then 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 102 of [Frege1879] p. 72. Compare with frege102 44392. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)
Theorem	frege106d 44182	If 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in 𝑅, then either 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 106 of [Frege1879] p. 73. Compare with frege106 44396. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	frege108d 44183	If either 𝐴 and 𝐶 are the same or 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 is the successor to 𝐶, then either 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 108 of [Frege1879] p. 74. Compare with frege108 44398. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	frege109d 44184	If 𝐴 contains all elements of 𝑈 and all elements after those in 𝑈 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then the image under 𝑅 of 𝐴 is a subclass of 𝐴. Similar to Proposition 109 of [Frege1879] p. 74. Compare with frege109 44399. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑈 ∪ ((t+‘𝑅) “ 𝑈)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	frege114d 44185	If either 𝑅 relates 𝐴 and 𝐵 or 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same, then either 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same, 𝑅 relates 𝐴 and 𝐵, 𝑅 relates 𝐵 and 𝐴. Similar to Proposition 114 of [Frege1879] p. 76. Compare with frege114 44404. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	frege111d 44186	If either 𝐴 and 𝐶 are the same or 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 is the successor to 𝐶, then either 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same or 𝐴 follows 𝐵 or 𝐵 and 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 111 of [Frege1879] p. 75. Compare with frege111 44401. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵(t+‘𝑅)𝐴))
Theorem	frege122d 44187	If 𝐹 is a function, 𝐴 is the successor of 𝑋, and 𝐵 is the successor of 𝑋, then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same (or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹). Similar to Proposition 122 of [Frege1879] p. 79. Compare with frege122 44412. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐹‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝐹‘𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	frege124d 44188	If 𝐹 is a function, 𝐴 is the successor of 𝑋, and 𝐵 follows 𝑋 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹. Similar to Proposition 124 of [Frege1879] p. 80. Compare with frege124 44414. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐹‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝐹)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	frege126d 44189	If 𝐹 is a function, 𝐴 is the successor of 𝑋, and 𝐵 follows 𝑋 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, then (for distinct 𝐴 and 𝐵) either 𝐴 follows 𝐵 or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹. Similar to Proposition 126 of [Frege1879] p. 81. Compare with frege126 44416. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐹‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝐹)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵(t+‘𝐹)𝐴))
Theorem	frege129d 44190	If 𝐹 is a function and (for distinct 𝐴 and 𝐵) either 𝐴 follows 𝐵 or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, the successor of 𝐴 is either 𝐵 or it follows 𝐵 or it comes before 𝐵 in the transitive closure of 𝐹. Similar to Proposition 129 of [Frege1879] p. 83. Comparw with frege129 44419. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐹‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵(t+‘𝐹)𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵(t+‘𝐹)𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶(t+‘𝐹)𝐵))
Theorem	frege131d 44191	If 𝐹 is a function and 𝐴 contains all elements of 𝑈 and all elements before or after those elements of 𝑈 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, then the image under 𝐹 of 𝐴 is a subclass of 𝐴. Similar to Proposition 131 of [Frege1879] p. 85. Compare with frege131 44421. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑈 ∪ ((◡(t+‘𝐹) “ 𝑈) ∪ ((t+‘𝐹) “ 𝑈))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	frege133d 44192	If 𝐹 is a function and 𝐴 and 𝐵 both follow 𝑋 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, then (for distinct 𝐴 and 𝐵) either 𝐴 follows 𝐵 or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹 (or both if it loops). Similar to Proposition 133 of [Frege1879] p. 86. Compare with frege133 44423. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝐹)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝐹)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵(t+‘𝐹)𝐴))
21.36.6  Propositions from _Begriffsschrift_ In 1879, Frege introduced notation for documenting formal reasoning about propositions (and classes) which covered elements of propositional logic, predicate calculus and reasoning about relations. However, due to the pitfalls of naive set theory, adapting this work for inclusion in set.mm required dividing statements about propositions from those about classes and identifying when a restriction to sets is required. For an overview comparing the details of Frege's two-dimensional notation and that used in set.mm, see mmfrege.html. See ru 3726 for discussion of an example of a class that is not a set. Numbered propositions from [Frege1879]. ax-frege1 44217, ax-frege2 44218, ax-frege8 44236, ax-frege28 44257, ax-frege31 44261, ax-frege41 44272, frege52 (see ax-frege52a 44284, frege52b 44316, and ax-frege52c 44315 for translations), frege54 (see ax-frege54a 44289, frege54b 44320 and ax-frege54c 44319 for translations) and frege58 (see ax-frege58a 44302, ax-frege58b 44328 and frege58c 44348 for translations) are considered "core" or axioms. However, at least ax-frege8 44236 can be derived from ax-frege1 44217 and ax-frege2 44218, see axfrege8 44234. Frege introduced implication, negation and the universal quantifier as primitives and did not in the numbered propositions use other logical connectives other than equivalence introduced in ax-frege52a 44284, frege52b 44316, and ax-frege52c 44315. In dffrege69 44359, Frege introduced 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 to say that relation 𝑅, when restricted to operate on elements of class 𝐴, will only have elements of class 𝐴 in its domain; see df-he 44200 for a definition in terms of image and subset. In dffrege76 44366, Frege introduced notation for the concept of two sets related by the transitive closure of a relation, for which we write 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌, which requires 𝑅 to also be a set. In dffrege99 44389, Frege introduced notation for the concept of two sets either identical or related by the transitive closure of a relation, for which we write 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑌, which is a superclass of sets related by the reflexive-transitive relation 𝑋(t*‘𝑅)𝑌. Finally, in dffrege115 44405, Frege introduced notation for the concept of a relation having the property elements in its domain pair up with only one element each in its range, for which we write Fun ◡◡𝑅 (to ignore any non-relational content of the class 𝑅). Frege did this without the expressing concept of a relation (or its transitive closure) as a class, and needed to invent conventions for discussing indeterminate propositions with two slots free and how to recognize which of the slots was domain and which was range. See mmfrege.html 44405 for details. English translations for specific propositions lifted in part from a translation by Stefan Bauer-Mengelberg as reprinted in From Frege to Goedel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931. An attempt to align these propositions in the larger set.mm database has also been made. See frege77d 44173 for an example.
21.36.6.1  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter I Section 2 introduces the turnstile ⊢ which turns an idea which may be true 𝜑 into an assertion that it does hold true ⊢ 𝜑. Section 5 introduces implication, (𝜑 → 𝜓). Section 6 introduces the single rule of interference relied upon, modus ponens ax-mp 5. Section 7 introduces negation and with in synonyms for or (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) , and ¬ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓), and two for exclusive-or corresponding to df-or 849, df-an 396, dfxor4 44193, dfxor5 44194. Section 8 introduces the problematic notation for identity of conceptual content which must be separated into cases for biconditional (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) or class equality 𝐴 = 𝐵 in this adaptation. Section 10 introduces "truth functions" for one or two variables in equally troubling notation, as the arguments may be understood to be logical predicates or collections. Here f(𝜑) is interpreted to mean if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) where the content of the "function" is specified by the latter two arguments or logical equivalent, while g(𝐴) is read as 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 and h(𝐴, 𝐵) as 𝐴𝐻𝐵. This necessarily introduces a need for set theory as both 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 and 𝐴𝐻𝐵 cannot hold unless 𝐴 is a set. (Also 𝐵.) Section 11 introduces notation for generality, but there is no standard notation for generality when the variable is a proposition because it was realized after Frege that the universe of all possible propositions includes paradoxical constructions leading to the failure of naive set theory. So adopting f(𝜑) as if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) would result in the translation of ∀𝜑 f (𝜑) as (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒). For collections, we must generalize over set variables or run into the same problems; this leads to ∀𝐴 g(𝐴) being translated as ∀𝑎𝑎 ∈ 𝐺 and so forth. Under this interpreation the text of section 11 gives us sp 2191 (or simpl 482 and simpr 484 and anifp 1072 in the propositional case) and statements similar to cbvalivw 2009, ax-gen 1797, alrimiv 1929, and alrimdv 1931. These last four introduce a generality and have no useful definition in terms of propositional variables. Section 12 introduces some combinations of primitive symbols and their human language counterparts. Using class notation, these can also be expressed without dummy variables. All are A, ∀𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 alex 1828, 𝐴 = V eqv 3439; Some are not B, ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, ∃𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 exnal 1829, 𝐵 ⊊ V pssv 4389, 𝐵 ≠ V nev 44197; There are no C, ∀𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, ¬ ∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 alnex 1783, 𝐶 = ∅ eq0 4290; There exist D, ¬ ∀𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷, ∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 df-ex 1782, ∅ ⊊ 𝐷 0pss 4387, 𝐷 ≠ ∅ n0 4293. Notation for relations between expressions also can be written in various ways. All E are P, ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) dfss6 3911, 𝐸 = (𝐸 ∩ 𝑃) dfss2 3907, 𝐸 ⊆ 𝑃 df-ss 3906; No F are P, ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) alinexa 1845, (𝐹 ∩ 𝑃) = ∅ disj1 4392; Some G are not P, ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐺 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) exanali 1861, (𝐺 ∩ 𝑃) ⊊ 𝐺 nssinpss 4207, ¬ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝑃 nss 3986; Some H are P, ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) exnalimn 1846, ∅ ⊊ (𝐻 ∩ 𝑃) 0pssin 44198, (𝐻 ∩ 𝑃) ≠ ∅ ndisj 4310.
Theorem	dfxor4 44193	Express exclusive-or in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 12. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ¬ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	dfxor5 44194	Express exclusive-or in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 12. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) → ¬ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	df3or2 44195	Express triple-or in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 25-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	df3an2 44196	Express triple-and in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 12. (Contributed by RP, 25-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒)))
Theorem	nev 44197*	Express that not every set is in a class. (Contributed by RP, 16-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ V ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	0pssin 44198*	Express that an intersection is not empty. (Contributed by RP, 16-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (∅ ⊊ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
21.36.6.2  _Begriffsschrift_ Notation hints The statement 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 means relation 𝑅 is hereditary (in the sense of Frege) in the class 𝐴 or (𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴. The former is only a slight reduction in the number of symbols, but this reduces the number of floating hypotheses needed to be checked. As Frege was not using the language of classes or sets, this naturally differs from the set-theoretic notion that a set is hereditary in a property: that all of its elements have a property and all of their elements have the property and so-on.
Syntax	whe 44199	The property of relation 𝑅 being hereditary in class 𝐴.
wff 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴
Definition	df-he 44200	The property of relation 𝑅 being hereditary in class 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴)