| Mathbox for Scott Fenton |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > untelirr | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: We call a class "untanged" if all its members are not members of themselves. The term originates from Isbell (see citation in dfon2 36303). Using this concept, we can avoid a lot of the uses of the Axiom of Regularity. Here, we prove a series of properties of untanged classes. First, we prove that an untangled class is not a member of itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Feb-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| untelirr | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | eleq1 2854 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)) | |
| 2 | eleq2 2855 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | bitrd 282 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)) |
| 4 | 3 | notbid 321 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)) |
| 5 | 4 | rspccv 3581 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)) |
| 6 | 5 | pm2.01d 192 | 1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2146 ∀wral 3082 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2148 ax-9 2156 ax-ext 2738 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-tru 1573 df-ex 1813 df-sb 2100 df-clab 2745 df-cleq 2758 df-clel 2841 df-ral 3083 |
| This theorem is used by: untsucf 36223 untangtr 36227 dfon2lem3 36296 dfon2lem7 36300 dfon2lem8 36301 dfon2lem9 36302 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |