NFE Home New Foundations Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  NFE Home  >  Th. List  >  ceqsex2v GIF version

Theorem ceqsex2v 2897
Description: Elimination of two existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2006.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
ceqsex2v.1 ⊢ A ∈ V
ceqsex2v.2 ⊢ B ∈ V
ceqsex2v.3 ⊢ (x = A → (φ ↔ ψ))
ceqsex2v.4 ⊢ (y = B → (ψ ↔ χ))
Assertion
Ref Expression
ceqsex2v ⊢ (∃x∃y(x = A ∧ y = B ∧ φ) ↔ χ)
Distinct variable groups:   x,y,A   x,B,y   ψ,x   χ,y
Allowed substitution hints:   φ(x, y)   ψ(y)   χ(x)

Proof of Theorem ceqsex2v
StepHypRef Expression
1 nfv 1619 . 2 ⊢ Ⅎxψ
2 nfv 1619 . 2 ⊢ Ⅎyχ
3 ceqsex2v.1 . 2 ⊢ A ∈ V
4 ceqsex2v.2 . 2 ⊢ B ∈ V
5 ceqsex2v.3 . 2 ⊢ (x = A → (φ ↔ ψ))
6 ceqsex2v.4 . 2 ⊢ (y = B → (ψ ↔ χ))
71, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6ceqsex2 2896 1 ⊢ (∃x∃y(x = A ∧ y = B ∧ φ) ↔ χ)
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 176   ∧ w3a 934  ∃wex 1541   = wceq 1642   ∈ wcel 1710  Vcvv 2860
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1546  ax-5 1557  ax-17 1616  ax-9 1654  ax-8 1675  ax-6 1729  ax-7 1734  ax-11 1746  ax-ext 2334
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 177  df-an 360  df-3an 936  df-tru 1319  df-ex 1542  df-nf 1545  df-sb 1649  df-clab 2340  df-cleq 2346  df-clel 2349  df-v 2862
This theorem is used by:  ceqsex3v  2898  ceqsex4v  2899  opksnelsik  4266  sikexlem  4296  br1stg  4731  elswap  4741  brswap2  4861  brsnsi  5774  oqelins4  5795  dmpprod  5841  lecex  6116  addccan2nclem1  6264  nmembers1lem1  6269
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator