ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  nfrexdya Unicode version

Theorem nfrexdya 2500
Description: Not-free for restricted existential quantification where  y and  A are distinct. See nfrexdxy 2498 for a version with  x and  y distinct instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2018.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
nfraldya.2  |-  F/ y
ph
nfraldya.3  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x A )
nfraldya.4  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x ps )
Assertion
Ref Expression
nfrexdya  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x E. y  e.  A  ps )
Distinct variable group:    y, A
Allowed substitution hints:    ph( x, y)    ps( x, y)    A( x)

Proof of Theorem nfrexdya
Dummy variable  z is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-rex 2448 . 2  |-  ( E. y  e.  A  ps  <->  E. y ( y  e.  A  /\  ps )
)
2 sban 1942 . . . . . 6  |-  ( [ z  /  y ] ( y  e.  A  /\  ps )  <->  ( [
z  /  y ] y  e.  A  /\  [ z  /  y ] ps ) )
3 clelsb3 2269 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( [ z  /  y ] y  e.  A  <->  z  e.  A )
43anbi1i 454 . . . . . 6  |-  ( ( [ z  /  y ] y  e.  A  /\  [ z  /  y ] ps )  <->  ( z  e.  A  /\  [ z  /  y ] ps ) )
52, 4bitri 183 . . . . 5  |-  ( [ z  /  y ] ( y  e.  A  /\  ps )  <->  ( z  e.  A  /\  [ z  /  y ] ps ) )
65exbii 1592 . . . 4  |-  ( E. z [ z  / 
y ] ( y  e.  A  /\  ps ) 
<->  E. z ( z  e.  A  /\  [
z  /  y ] ps ) )
7 nfv 1515 . . . . 5  |-  F/ z ( y  e.  A  /\  ps )
87sb8e 1844 . . . 4  |-  ( E. y ( y  e.  A  /\  ps )  <->  E. z [ z  / 
y ] ( y  e.  A  /\  ps ) )
9 df-rex 2448 . . . 4  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  [
z  /  y ] ps  <->  E. z ( z  e.  A  /\  [
z  /  y ] ps ) )
106, 8, 93bitr4i 211 . . 3  |-  ( E. y ( y  e.  A  /\  ps )  <->  E. z  e.  A  [
z  /  y ] ps )
11 nfv 1515 . . . 4  |-  F/ z
ph
12 nfraldya.3 . . . 4  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x A )
13 nfraldya.2 . . . . 5  |-  F/ y
ph
14 nfraldya.4 . . . . 5  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x ps )
1513, 14nfsbd 1964 . . . 4  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x [ z  /  y ] ps )
1611, 12, 15nfrexdxy 2498 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x E. z  e.  A  [ z  /  y ] ps )
1710, 16nfxfrd 1462 . 2  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x E. y
( y  e.  A  /\  ps ) )
181, 17nfxfrd 1462 1  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x E. y  e.  A  ps )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 103   F/wnf 1447   E.wex 1479   [wsb 1749    e. wcel 2135   F/_wnfc 2293   E.wrex 2443
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1434  ax-7 1435  ax-gen 1436  ax-ie1 1480  ax-ie2 1481  ax-8 1491  ax-10 1492  ax-11 1493  ax-i12 1494  ax-bndl 1496  ax-4 1497  ax-17 1513  ax-i9 1517  ax-ial 1521  ax-i5r 1522  ax-ext 2146
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1448  df-sb 1750  df-cleq 2157  df-clel 2160  df-nfc 2295  df-rex 2448
This theorem is referenced by:  nfrexya  2505
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator