P. 26 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 2501-2600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ralbid2 2501	Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by BJ, 14-Jul-2024.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A -> ps ) <-> ( x e. B -> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A ps <-> A. x e. B ch ) )
Theorem	rexbid2 2502	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by BJ, 14-Jul-2024.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ ps ) <-> ( x e. B /\ ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A ps <-> E. x e. B ch ) )
Theorem	ralbii 2503	Inference adding restricted universal quantifier to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. x e. A ps )
Theorem	rexbii 2504	Inference adding restricted existential quantifier to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. x e. A ps )
Theorem	2ralbii 2505	Inference adding two restricted universal quantifiers to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ph <-> A. x e. A A. y e. B ps )
Theorem	2rexbii 2506	Inference adding two restricted existential quantifiers to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ph <-> E. x e. A E. y e. B ps )
Theorem	ralbii2 2507	Inference adding different restricted universal quantifiers to each side of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-2005.)
|- ( ( x e. A -> ph ) <-> ( x e. B -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. x e. B ps )
Theorem	rexbii2 2508	Inference adding different restricted existential quantifiers to each side of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2004.)
|- ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) <-> ( x e. B /\ ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. x e. B ps )
Theorem	raleqbii 2509	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier, changing both formula and quantifier domain. Inference form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- A = B   &    |- ( ps <-> ch )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ps <-> A. x e. B ch )
Theorem	rexeqbii 2510	Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier, changing both formula and quantifier domain. Inference form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- A = B   &    |- ( ps <-> ch )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ps <-> E. x e. B ch )
Theorem	ralbiia 2511	Inference adding restricted universal quantifier to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2000.)
|- ( x e. A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. x e. A ps )
Theorem	rexbiia 2512	Inference adding restricted existential quantifier to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-1999.)
|- ( x e. A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. x e. A ps )
Theorem	2rexbiia 2513*	Inference adding two restricted existential quantifiers to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.)
|- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ph <-> E. x e. A E. y e. B ps )
Theorem	r2alf 2514*	Double restricted universal quantification. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ y A   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ph <-> A. x A. y ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> ph ) )
Theorem	r2exf 2515*	Double restricted existential quantification. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ y A   =>    |- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ph <-> E. x E. y ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) )
Theorem	r2al 2516*	Double restricted universal quantification. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1995.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ph <-> A. x A. y ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> ph ) )
Theorem	r2ex 2517*	Double restricted existential quantification. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.)
|- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ph <-> E. x E. y ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) )
Theorem	2ralbida 2518*	Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2004.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ps <-> A. x e. A A. y e. B ch ) )
Theorem	2ralbidva 2519*	Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ps <-> A. x e. A A. y e. B ch ) )
Theorem	2rexbidva 2520*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2004.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ps <-> E. x e. A E. y e. B ch ) )
Theorem	2ralbidv 2521*	Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2006.) (Revised by Szymon Jaroszewicz, 16-Mar-2007.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ps <-> A. x e. A A. y e. B ch ) )
Theorem	2rexbidv 2522*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2006.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ps <-> E. x e. A E. y e. B ch ) )
Theorem	rexralbidv 2523*	Formula-building rule for restricted quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2006.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A A. y e. B ps <-> E. x e. A A. y e. B ch ) )
Theorem	ralinexa 2524	A transformation of restricted quantifiers and logical connectives. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( ph -> -. ps ) <-> -. E. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) )
Theorem	risset 2525*	Two ways to say " A belongs to B". (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( A e. B <-> E. x e. B x = A )
Theorem	hbral 2526	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 13-Dec-2009.)
|- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x ph )   =>    |- ( A. y e. A ph -> A. x A. y e. A ph )
Theorem	hbra1 2527	x is not free in A. x e. A ph. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1996.)
|- ( A. x e. A ph -> A. x A. x e. A ph )
Theorem	nfra1 2528	x is not free in A. x e. A ph. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x A. x e. A ph
Theorem	nfraldw 2529*	Not-free for restricted universal quantification where x and y are distinct. See nfraldya 2532 for a version with y and A distinct instead. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x A. y e. A ps )
Theorem	nfraldxy 2530*	Old name for nfraldw 2529. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-May-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x A. y e. A ps )
Theorem	nfrexdxy 2531*	Not-free for restricted existential quantification where x and y are distinct. See nfrexdya 2533 for a version with y and A distinct instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2018.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x E. y e. A ps )
Theorem	nfraldya 2532*	Not-free for restricted universal quantification where y and A are distinct. See nfraldxy 2530 for a version with x and y distinct instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2018.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x A. y e. A ps )
Theorem	nfrexdya 2533*	Not-free for restricted existential quantification where y and A are distinct. See nfrexdxy 2531 for a version with x and y distinct instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2018.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x E. y e. A ps )
Theorem	nfralw 2534*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted quantification. See nfralya 2537 for a version with y and A distinct instead of x and y. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ph   =>    |- F/ x A. y e. A ph
Theorem	nfralxy 2535*	Old name for nfralw 2534. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ph   =>    |- F/ x A. y e. A ph
Theorem	nfrexw 2536*	Not-free for restricted existential quantification where x and y are distinct. See nfrexya 2538 for a version with y and A distinct instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2018.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ph   =>    |- F/ x E. y e. A ph
Theorem	nfralya 2537*	Not-free for restricted universal quantification where y and A are distinct. See nfralxy 2535 for a version with x and y distinct instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jun-2018.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ph   =>    |- F/ x A. y e. A ph
Theorem	nfrexya 2538*	Not-free for restricted existential quantification where y and A are distinct. See nfrexw 2536 for a version with x and y distinct instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jun-2018.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ph   =>    |- F/ x E. y e. A ph
Theorem	nfra2xy 2539*	Not-free given two restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Aug-2018.)
|- F/ y A. x e. A A. y e. B ph
Theorem	nfre1 2540	x is not free in E. x e. A ph. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x E. x e. A ph
Theorem	r3al 2541*	Triple restricted universal quantification. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1995.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B A. z e. C ph <-> A. x A. y A. z ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B /\ z e. C ) -> ph ) )
Theorem	alral 2542	Universal quantification implies restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2006.)
|- ( A. x ph -> A. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rexex 2543	Restricted existence implies existence. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.)
|- ( E. x e. A ph -> E. x ph )
Theorem	rsp 2544	Restricted specialization. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1996.)
|- ( A. x e. A ph -> ( x e. A -> ph ) )
Theorem	rspa 2545	Restricted specialization. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|- ( ( A. x e. A ph /\ x e. A ) -> ph )
Theorem	rspe 2546	Restricted specialization. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-1999.)
|- ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) -> E. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rsp2 2547	Restricted specialization. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-1997.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> ph ) )
Theorem	rsp2e 2548	Restricted specialization. (Contributed by FL, 4-Jun-2012.)
|- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B /\ ph ) -> E. x e. A E. y e. B ph )
Theorem	rspec 2549	Specialization rule for restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1994.)
|- A. x e. A ph   =>    |- ( x e. A -> ph )
Theorem	rgen 2550	Generalization rule for restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1994.)
|- ( x e. A -> ph )   =>    |- A. x e. A ph
Theorem	rgen2a 2551*	Generalization rule for restricted quantification. Note that x and y are not required to be disjoint. This proof illustrates the use of dvelim 2036. Usage of rgen2 2583 instead is highly encouraged. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jun-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ph )   =>    |- A. x e. A A. y e. A ph
Theorem	rgenw 2552	Generalization rule for restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2014.)
|- ph   =>    |- A. x e. A ph
Theorem	rgen2w 2553	Generalization rule for restricted quantification. Note that x and y needn't be distinct. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2014.)
|- ph   =>    |- A. x e. A A. y e. B ph
Theorem	mprg 2554	Modus ponens combined with restricted generalization. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2004.)
|- ( A. x e. A ph -> ps )   &    |- ( x e. A -> ph )   =>    |- ps
Theorem	mprgbir 2555	Modus ponens on biconditional combined with restricted generalization. (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2004.)
|- ( ph <-> A. x e. A ps )   &    |- ( x e. A -> ps )   =>    |- ph
Theorem	ralim 2556	Distribution of restricted quantification over implication. (Contributed by NM, 9-Feb-1997.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) -> ( A. x e. A ph -> A. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	ralimi2 2557	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.)
|- ( ( x e. A -> ph ) -> ( x e. B -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph -> A. x e. B ps )
Theorem	ralimia 2558	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-1996.)
|- ( x e. A -> ( ph -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph -> A. x e. A ps )
Theorem	ralimiaa 2559	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2007.)
|- ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) -> ps )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph -> A. x e. A ps )
Theorem	ralimi 2560	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent, with strong hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.)
|- ( ph -> ps )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph -> A. x e. A ps )
Theorem	2ralimi 2561	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent two times, with strong hypothesis. (Contributed by AV, 3-Dec-2021.)
|- ( ph -> ps )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. B ps )
Theorem	ral2imi 2562	Inference quantifying antecedent, nested antecedent, and consequent, with a strong hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2006.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps -> ch ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph -> ( A. x e. A ps -> A. x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	ralimdaa 2563	Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A ps -> A. x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	ralimdva 2564*	Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A ps -> A. x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	ralimdv 2565*	Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2003.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps -> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A ps -> A. x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	ralimdvva 2566*	Deduction doubly quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90 (alim 1471). (Contributed by AV, 27-Nov-2019.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ps -> A. x e. A A. y e. B ch ) )
Theorem	ralimdv2 2567*	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2005.)
|- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A -> ps ) -> ( x e. B -> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A ps -> A. x e. B ch ) )
Theorem	ralrimi 2568	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-1999.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A ps )
Theorem	ralrimiv 2569*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A ps )
Theorem	ralrimiva 2570*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2006.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A ps )
Theorem	ralrimivw 2571*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2014.)
|- ( ph -> ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A ps )
Theorem	r19.21t 2572	Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers (closed theorem version). (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.)
|- ( F/ x ph -> ( A. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) <-> ( ph -> A. x e. A ps ) ) )
Theorem	r19.21 2573	Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 30-Mar-2011.)
|- F/ x ph   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) <-> ( ph -> A. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.21v 2574*	Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) <-> ( ph -> A. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	ralrimd 2575	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2004.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps -> ( x e. A -> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ps -> A. x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	ralrimdv 2576*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps -> ( x e. A -> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ps -> A. x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	ralrimdva 2577*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2008.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ps -> A. x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	ralrimivv 2578*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version with double quantification.) (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.)
|- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. B ps )
Theorem	ralrimivva 2579*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version with double quantification.) (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) -> ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. B ps )
Theorem	ralrimivvva 2580*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version with triple quantification.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B /\ z e. C ) ) -> ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. B A. z e. C ps )
Theorem	ralrimdvv 2581*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version with double quantification.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2005.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ps -> A. x e. A A. y e. B ch ) )
Theorem	ralrimdvva 2582*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version with double quantification.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2008.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ps -> A. x e. A A. y e. B ch ) )
Theorem	rgen2 2583*	Generalization rule for restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1999.)
|- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> ph )   =>    |- A. x e. A A. y e. B ph
Theorem	rgen3 2584*	Generalization rule for restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2008.)
|- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B /\ z e. C ) -> ph )   =>    |- A. x e. A A. y e. B A. z e. C ph
Theorem	r19.21bi 2585	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A ps )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ps )
Theorem	rspec2 2586	Specialization rule for restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.)
|- A. x e. A A. y e. B ph   =>    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> ph )
Theorem	rspec3 2587	Specialization rule for restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.)
|- A. x e. A A. y e. B A. z e. C ph   =>    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B /\ z e. C ) -> ph )
Theorem	r19.21be 2588	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A ps )   =>    |- A. x e. A ( ph -> ps )
Theorem	nrex 2589	Inference adding restricted existential quantifier to negated wff. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.)
|- ( x e. A -> -. ps )   =>    |- -. E. x e. A ps
Theorem	nrexdv 2590*	Deduction adding restricted existential quantifier to negated wff. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> -. ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. E. x e. A ps )
Theorem	rexim 2591	Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) -> ( E. x e. A ph -> E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	reximia 2592	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.)
|- ( x e. A -> ( ph -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph -> E. x e. A ps )
Theorem	reximi2 2593	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2004.)
|- ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) -> ( x e. B /\ ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph -> E. x e. B ps )
Theorem	reximi 2594	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1996.)
|- ( ph -> ps )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph -> E. x e. A ps )
Theorem	reximdai 2595	Deduction from Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1999.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> ( ps -> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A ps -> E. x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	reximdv2 2596*	Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.)
|- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ ps ) -> ( x e. B /\ ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A ps -> E. x e. B ch ) )
Theorem	reximdvai 2597*	Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2002.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> ( ps -> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A ps -> E. x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	reximdv 2598*	Deduction from Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version with strong hypothesis.) (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps -> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A ps -> E. x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	reximdva 2599*	Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A ps -> E. x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	reximddv 2600*	Deduction from Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2016.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ ps ) ) -> ch )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. A ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. A ch )