ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  nfraldya Unicode version

Theorem nfraldya 2412
Description: Not-free for restricted universal quantification where  y and  A are distinct. See nfraldxy 2410 for a version with  x and  y distinct instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2018.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
nfraldya.2  |-  F/ y
ph
nfraldya.3  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x A )
nfraldya.4  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x ps )
Assertion
Ref Expression
nfraldya  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x A. y  e.  A  ps )
Distinct variable group:    y, A
Allowed substitution hints:    ph( x, y)    ps( x, y)    A( x)

Proof of Theorem nfraldya
Dummy variable  z is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-ral 2364 . 2  |-  ( A. y  e.  A  ps  <->  A. y ( y  e.  A  ->  ps )
)
2 sbim 1875 . . . . . 6  |-  ( [ z  /  y ] ( y  e.  A  ->  ps )  <->  ( [
z  /  y ] y  e.  A  ->  [ z  /  y ] ps ) )
3 clelsb3 2192 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( [ z  /  y ] y  e.  A  <->  z  e.  A )
43imbi1i 236 . . . . . 6  |-  ( ( [ z  /  y ] y  e.  A  ->  [ z  /  y ] ps )  <->  ( z  e.  A  ->  [ z  /  y ] ps ) )
52, 4bitri 182 . . . . 5  |-  ( [ z  /  y ] ( y  e.  A  ->  ps )  <->  ( z  e.  A  ->  [ z  /  y ] ps ) )
65albii 1404 . . . 4  |-  ( A. z [ z  /  y ] ( y  e.  A  ->  ps )  <->  A. z ( z  e.  A  ->  [ z  /  y ] ps ) )
7 nfv 1466 . . . . 5  |-  F/ z ( y  e.  A  ->  ps )
87sb8 1784 . . . 4  |-  ( A. y ( y  e.  A  ->  ps )  <->  A. z [ z  / 
y ] ( y  e.  A  ->  ps ) )
9 df-ral 2364 . . . 4  |-  ( A. z  e.  A  [
z  /  y ] ps  <->  A. z ( z  e.  A  ->  [ z  /  y ] ps ) )
106, 8, 93bitr4i 210 . . 3  |-  ( A. y ( y  e.  A  ->  ps )  <->  A. z  e.  A  [
z  /  y ] ps )
11 nfv 1466 . . . 4  |-  F/ z
ph
12 nfraldya.3 . . . 4  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x A )
13 nfraldya.2 . . . . 5  |-  F/ y
ph
14 nfraldya.4 . . . . 5  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x ps )
1513, 14nfsbd 1899 . . . 4  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x [ z  /  y ] ps )
1611, 12, 15nfraldxy 2410 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x A. z  e.  A  [ z  /  y ] ps )
1710, 16nfxfrd 1409 . 2  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x A. y
( y  e.  A  ->  ps ) )
181, 17nfxfrd 1409 1  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x A. y  e.  A  ps )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4   A.wal 1287   F/wnf 1394    e. wcel 1438   [wsb 1692   F/_wnfc 2215   A.wral 2359
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 665  ax-5 1381  ax-7 1382  ax-gen 1383  ax-ie1 1427  ax-ie2 1428  ax-8 1440  ax-10 1441  ax-11 1442  ax-i12 1443  ax-bndl 1444  ax-4 1445  ax-17 1464  ax-i9 1468  ax-ial 1472  ax-i5r 1473  ax-ext 2070
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1395  df-sb 1693  df-cleq 2081  df-clel 2084  df-nfc 2217  df-ral 2364
This theorem is referenced by:  nfralya  2416
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator