Theorem sbciegft 3008

Description: Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, using a bound-variable hypothesis instead of distinct variables. (Closed theorem version of sbciegf 3009.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbciegft	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem sbciegft

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbc5 3001	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
2		biimp 118	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
3	2	imim2i 12	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)))
4	3	impd 254	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) → ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓))
5	4	alimi 1466	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) → ∀𝑥((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓))
6		19.23t 1688	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → (∀𝑥((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)))
7	6	biimpa 296	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)) → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓))
8	5, 7	sylan2 286	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓))
9	8	3adant1 1017	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓))
10	1, 9	biimtrid 152	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜓))
11		biimpr 130	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
12	11	imim2i 12	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 → 𝜑)))
13	12	com23 78	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) → (𝜓 → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
14	13	alimi 1466	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
15		19.21t 1593	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)) ↔ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))))
16	15	biimpa 296	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))) → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
17	14, 16	sylan2 286	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
18	17	3adant1 1017	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
19		sbc6g 3002	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
20	19	3ad2ant1 1020	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
21	18, 20	sylibrd 169	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) → (𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
22	10, 21	impbid 129	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   ∧ w3a 980  ∀wal 1362   = wceq 1364  Ⅎwnf 1471  ∃wex 1503   ∈ wcel 2160  [wsbc 2977

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-ext 2171

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-clab 2176  df-cleq 2182  df-clel 2185  df-nfc 2321  df-v 2754  df-sbc 2978

This theorem is referenced by:  sbciegf  3009  sbciedf  3013