Theorem ceqsexg 2935

Description: A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ceqsexg.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
ceqsexg.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsexg	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsexg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcv 2375	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		nfe1 1545	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)
3		ceqsexg.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
4	2, 3	nfbi 1638	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
5		ceqex 2934	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
6		ceqsexg.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
7	5, 6	bibi12d 235	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)))
8		biid 171	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
9	1, 4, 7, 8	vtoclgf 2863	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1398  Ⅎwnf 1509  ∃wex 1541   ∈ wcel 2202

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-ext 2213

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1401  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2364  df-v 2805

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsexgv  2936