Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > ceqsexg | GIF version |
Description: A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ceqsexg.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 |
ceqsexg.2 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ceqsexg | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | nfcv 2281 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
2 | nfe1 1472 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) | |
3 | ceqsexg.1 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 | |
4 | 2, 3 | nfbi 1568 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓) |
5 | ceqex 2812 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
6 | ceqsexg.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
7 | 5, 6 | bibi12d 234 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))) |
8 | biid 170 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑) | |
9 | 1, 4, 7, 8 | vtoclgf 2744 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 = wceq 1331 Ⅎwnf 1436 ∃wex 1468 ∈ wcel 1480 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 698 ax-5 1423 ax-7 1424 ax-gen 1425 ax-ie1 1469 ax-ie2 1470 ax-8 1482 ax-10 1483 ax-11 1484 ax-i12 1485 ax-bndl 1486 ax-4 1487 ax-17 1506 ax-i9 1510 ax-ial 1514 ax-i5r 1515 ax-ext 2121 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-tru 1334 df-nf 1437 df-sb 1736 df-clab 2126 df-cleq 2132 df-clel 2135 df-nfc 2270 df-v 2688 |
This theorem is referenced by: ceqsexgv 2814 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |