Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > ceqsexg | GIF version |
Description: A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ceqsexg.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 |
ceqsexg.2 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ceqsexg | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | nfcv 2312 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
2 | nfe1 1489 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) | |
3 | ceqsexg.1 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 | |
4 | 2, 3 | nfbi 1582 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓) |
5 | ceqex 2857 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
6 | ceqsexg.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
7 | 5, 6 | bibi12d 234 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))) |
8 | biid 170 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑) | |
9 | 1, 4, 7, 8 | vtoclgf 2788 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 = wceq 1348 Ⅎwnf 1453 ∃wex 1485 ∈ wcel 2141 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 704 ax-5 1440 ax-7 1441 ax-gen 1442 ax-ie1 1486 ax-ie2 1487 ax-8 1497 ax-10 1498 ax-11 1499 ax-i12 1500 ax-bndl 1502 ax-4 1503 ax-17 1519 ax-i9 1523 ax-ial 1527 ax-i5r 1528 ax-ext 2152 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-tru 1351 df-nf 1454 df-sb 1756 df-clab 2157 df-cleq 2163 df-clel 2166 df-nfc 2301 df-v 2732 |
This theorem is referenced by: ceqsexgv 2859 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |