Theorem nfeud 2013

Description: Deduction version of nfeu 2016. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 25-May-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfeud.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
nfeud.2	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfeud	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑦𝜓)

Proof of Theorem nfeud

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1508	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜓
2	1	sb8eu 2010	. 2 ⊢ (∃!𝑦𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑧[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓)
3		nfv 1508	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
4		nfeud.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
5		nfeud.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
6	4, 5	nfsbd 1948	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓)
7	3, 6	nfeudv 2012	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑧[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓)
8	2, 7	nfxfrd 1451	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑦𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  Ⅎwnf 1436  [wsb 1735  ∃!weu 1997

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-eu 2000

This theorem is referenced by:  nfmod  2014  hbeud  2019  nfreudxy  2602