Theorem nfsb4t 2002

Description: A variable not free remains so after substitution with a distinct variable (closed form of hbsb4 2000). (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 9-May-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfsb4t	⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))

Proof of Theorem nfsb4t

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfnf1 1532	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
2	1	nfal 1564	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
3		nfnae 1710	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦
4	2, 3	nfan 1553	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦)
5		df-nf 1449	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑))
6	5	albii 1458	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑧(𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑))
7		hbsb4t 2001	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑧(𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑) → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
8	6, 7	sylbi 120	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
9	8	imp 123	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
10	4, 9	nfd 1511	. 2 ⊢ ((∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
11	10	ex 114	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103  ∀wal 1341  Ⅎwnf 1448  [wsb 1750

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1346  df-fal 1349  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751

This theorem is referenced by:  dvelimdf  2004