Theorem spc2ed 6469

Description: Existential specialization with 2 quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Aug-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
spc2ed.x	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒
spc2ed.y	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒
spc2ed.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
spc2ed	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝑉(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝑊(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem spc2ed

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elisset 2836	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
2		elisset 2836	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐵)
3	1, 2	anim12i 338	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐵))
4		eeanv 1992	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ↔ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐵))
5	3, 4	sylibr 134	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵))
6		nfv 1581	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
7		spc2ed.x	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒
8	6, 7	nfan 1618	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)
9		nfv 1581	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
10		spc2ed.y	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒
11	9, 10	nfan 1618	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)
12		anass 405	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵))))
13		ancom 266	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))
14	13	anbi1i 462	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)))
15	12, 14	bitr3i 186	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵))) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)))
16		spc2ed.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
17	16	biimparc 299	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵))) → 𝜓)
18	15, 17	sylbir 135	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → 𝜓)
19	18	ex 115	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝜓))
20	11, 19	eximd 1665	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → ∃𝑦𝜓))
21	8, 20	eximd 1665	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜓))
22	21	impancom 260	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜓))
23	5, 22	sylan2 286	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜓))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1402  Ⅎwnf 1513  ∃wex 1545   ∈ wcel 2209

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-ext 2220

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-v 2823

This theorem is used by:  cnvoprab  6470