P. 63 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6201-6300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	caovdird 6201*	Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐾)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑧)𝐻(𝑦𝐺𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐺𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐻(𝐵𝐺𝐶)))
Theorem	caovdi 6202*	Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐹(𝑥𝐺𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐹(𝐴𝐺𝐶))
Theorem	caov32d 6203*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	caov12d 6204*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = (𝐵𝐹(𝐴𝐹𝐶)))
Theorem	caov31d 6205*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = ((𝐶𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐴))
Theorem	caov13d 6206*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = (𝐶𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐴)))
Theorem	caov4d 6207*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐶𝐹𝐷)) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐷)))
Theorem	caov411d 6208*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐶𝐹𝐷)) = ((𝐶𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐴𝐹𝐷)))
Theorem	caov42d 6209*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐶𝐹𝐷)) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹(𝐷𝐹𝐵)))
Theorem	caov32 6210*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹𝐵)
Theorem	caov12 6211*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = (𝐵𝐹(𝐴𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	caov31 6212*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = ((𝐶𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐴)
Theorem	caov13 6213*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = (𝐶𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐴))
Theorem	caovdilemd 6214*	Lemma used by real number construction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑧)𝐹(𝑦𝐺𝑧)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐺𝑧)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐹(𝐵𝐺𝐷))𝐺𝐻) = ((𝐴𝐺(𝐶𝐺𝐻))𝐹(𝐵𝐺(𝐷𝐺𝐻))))
Theorem	caovlem2d 6215*	Rearrangement of expression involving multiplication (𝐺) and addition (𝐹). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑧)𝐹(𝑦𝐺𝑧)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐺𝑧)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐹(𝐵𝐺𝐷))𝐺𝐻)𝐹(((𝐴𝐺𝐷)𝐹(𝐵𝐺𝐶))𝐺𝑅)) = ((𝐴𝐺((𝐶𝐺𝐻)𝐹(𝐷𝐺𝑅)))𝐹(𝐵𝐺((𝐶𝐺𝑅)𝐹(𝐷𝐺𝐻)))))
Theorem	caovimo 6216*	Uniqueness of inverse element in commutative, associative operation with identity. The identity element is 𝐵. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Sep-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝑥𝐹𝐵) = 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 → ∃*𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝑤) = 𝐵))
2.6.12  Maps-to notation
Theorem	elmpocl 6217*	If a two-parameter class is inhabited, constrain the implicit pair. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑆𝐹𝑇) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	elmpocl1 6218*	If a two-parameter class is inhabited, the first argument is in its nominal domain. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑆𝐹𝑇) → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	elmpocl2 6219*	If a two-parameter class is inhabited, the second argument is in its nominal domain. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑆𝐹𝑇) → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	elovmpod 6220*	Utility lemma for two-parameter classes. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Jan-2015.) Variant of elovmpo 6221 in deduction form. (Revised by AV, 20-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑌) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 ∈ (𝑋𝑂𝑌) ↔ 𝐸 ∈ 𝐷))
Theorem	elovmpo 6221*	Utility lemma for two-parameter classes. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑌) → 𝐶 = 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐷𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	elovmporab 6222*	Implications for the value of an operation, defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result, having an element. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ∣ 𝜑})    &   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V) → 𝑀 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝑂𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑀))
Theorem	elovmporab1w 6223*	Implications for the value of an operation, defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result, having an element. Here, the base set of the class abstraction depends on the first operand. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (Revised by GG, 26-Jan-2024.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑})    &   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V) → ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝑂𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀))
Theorem	relmptopab 6224*	Any function to sets of ordered pairs produces a relation on function value unconditionally. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Aug-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})    ⇒   ⊢ Rel (𝐹‘𝐵)
Theorem	f1ocnvd 6225*	Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ ◡𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)))
Theorem	f1od 6226*	Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
Theorem	f1ocnv2d 6227*	Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ ◡𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)))
Theorem	f1o2d 6228*	Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
Theorem	f1opw2 6229*	A one-to-one mapping induces a one-to-one mapping on power sets. This version of f1opw 6230 avoids the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐹 “ 𝑎) ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝑏) ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑏)):𝒫 𝐴–1-1-onto→𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	f1opw 6230*	A one-to-one mapping induces a one-to-one mapping on power sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → (𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑏)):𝒫 𝐴–1-1-onto→𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	suppssfv 6231*	Formula building theorem for support restriction, on a function which preserves zero. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (◡(𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐴) “ (V ∖ {𝑌})) ⊆ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑌) = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡(𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝐹‘𝐴)) “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) ⊆ 𝐿)
Theorem	suppssov1 6232*	Formula building theorem for support restrictions: operator with left annihilator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (◡(𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐴) “ (V ∖ {𝑌})) ⊆ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝑌𝑂𝑣) = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡(𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝐴𝑂𝐵)) “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) ⊆ 𝐿)
2.6.13  Function operation
Syntax	cof 6233	Extend class notation to include mapping of an operation to a function operation.
class ∘𝑓 𝑅
Syntax	cofr 6234	Extend class notation to include mapping of a binary relation to a function relation.
class ∘𝑟 𝑅
Definition	df-of 6235*	Define the function operation map. The definition is designed so that if 𝑅 is a binary operation, then ∘𝑓 𝑅 is the analogous operation on functions which corresponds to applying 𝑅 pointwise to the values of the functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ∘𝑓 𝑅 = (𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))))
Definition	df-ofr 6236*	Define the function relation map. The definition is designed so that if 𝑅 is a binary relation, then ∘𝑓 𝑅 is the analogous relation on functions which is true when each element of the left function relates to the corresponding element of the right function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ∘𝑟 𝑅 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔)(𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥)}
Theorem	ofeqd 6237	Equality theorem for function operation, deduction form. (Contributed by SN, 11-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∘𝑓 𝑅 = ∘𝑓 𝑆)
Theorem	ofeq 6238	Equality theorem for function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ∘𝑓 𝑅 = ∘𝑓 𝑆)
Theorem	ofreq 6239	Equality theorem for function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ∘𝑟 𝑅 = ∘𝑟 𝑆)
Theorem	ofexg 6240	A function operation restricted to a set is a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( ∘𝑓 𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	nfof 6241	Hypothesis builder for function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ∘𝑓 𝑅
Theorem	nfofr 6242	Hypothesis builder for function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ∘𝑟 𝑅
Theorem	offval 6243*	Value of an operation applied to two functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ (𝐶𝑅𝐷)))
Theorem	ofrfval 6244*	Value of a relation applied to two functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑅𝐺 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝐶𝑅𝐷))
Theorem	ofvalg 6245	Evaluate a function operation at a point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑋) = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐶𝑅𝐷) ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺)‘𝑋) = (𝐶𝑅𝐷))
Theorem	ofrval 6246	Exhibit a function relation at a point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑋) = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑅𝐺 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐶𝑅𝐷)
Theorem	ofmresval 6247	Value of a restriction of the function operation map. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹( ∘𝑓 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺))
Theorem	off 6248*	The function operation produces a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺):𝐶⟶𝑈)
Theorem	offeq 6249*	Convert an identity of the operation to the analogous identity on the function operation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐶⟶𝑈)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐷𝑅𝐸) = (𝐻‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = 𝐻)
Theorem	ofres 6250	Restrict the operands of a function operation to the same domain as that of the operation itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐶) ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐺 ↾ 𝐶)))
Theorem	offval2 6251*	The function operation expressed as a mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵𝑅𝐶)))
Theorem	ofrfval2 6252*	The function relation acting on maps. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑅𝐺 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵𝑅𝐶))
Theorem	suppssof1 6253*	Formula building theorem for support restrictions: vector operation with left annihilator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐴 “ (V ∖ {𝑌})) ⊆ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝑌𝑂𝑣) = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝐷⟶𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐷⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡(𝐴 ∘𝑓 𝑂𝐵) “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) ⊆ 𝐿)
Theorem	ofco 6254	The composition of a function operation with another function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐷⟶𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) ∘ 𝐻) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐺 ∘ 𝐻)))
Theorem	offveqb 6255*	Equivalent expressions for equality with a function operation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 = (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐵𝑅𝐶)))
Theorem	offveq 6256*	Convert an identity of the operation to the analogous identity on the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵𝑅𝐶) = (𝐻‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = 𝐻)
Theorem	ofc1g 6257	Left operation by a constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵𝑅𝐶) ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐹)‘𝑋) = (𝐵𝑅𝐶))
Theorem	ofc2g 6258	Right operation by a constant. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶𝑅𝐵) ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐵}))‘𝑋) = (𝐶𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	ofc12 6259	Function operation on two constant functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐶})) = (𝐴 × {(𝐵𝑅𝐶)}))
Theorem	caofref 6260*	Transfer a reflexive law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥𝑅𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑅𝐹)
Theorem	caofinvl 6261*	Transfer a left inverse law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁:𝑆⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑁‘(𝐹‘𝑣))))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑁‘𝑥)𝑅𝑥) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐹) = (𝐴 × {𝐵}))
Theorem	caofid0l 6262*	Transfer a left identity law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐵𝑅𝑥) = 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐹) = 𝐹)
Theorem	caofid0r 6263*	Transfer a right identity law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝑅𝐵) = 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐵})) = 𝐹)
Theorem	caofid1 6264*	Transfer a right absorption law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝑅𝐵) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐵})) = (𝐴 × {𝐶}))
Theorem	caofid2 6265*	Transfer a right absorption law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐵𝑅𝑥) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐹) = (𝐴 × {𝐶}))
Theorem	caofcom 6266*	Transfer a commutative law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦) = (𝑦𝑅𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = (𝐺 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐹))
Theorem	caofrss 6267*	Transfer a relation subset law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑇𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑅𝐺 → 𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑇𝐺))
Theorem	caoftrn 6268*	Transfer a transitivity law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑇𝑧) → 𝑥𝑈𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑅𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ∘𝑟 𝑇𝐻) → 𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑈𝐻))
Theorem	caofdig 6269*	Transfer a distributive law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑇𝑦) ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑇(𝑦𝑅𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝑇𝑦)𝑂(𝑥𝑇𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑇(𝐺 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐻)) = ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑇𝐺) ∘𝑓 𝑂(𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑇𝐻)))
2.6.14  Functions (continued)
Theorem	resfunexgALT 6270	The restriction of a function to a set exists. Compare Proposition 6.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 28. This version has a shorter proof than resfunexg 5875 but requires ax-pow 4264 and ax-un 4530. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1995.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	cofunexg 6271	Existence of a composition when the first member is a function. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	cofunex2g 6272	Existence of a composition when the second member is one-to-one. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun ◡𝐵) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	fnexALT 6273	If the domain of a function is a set, the function is a set. Theorem 6.16(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 28. This theorem is derived using the Axiom of Replacement in the form of funimaexg 5414. This version of fnex 5876 uses ax-pow 4264 and ax-un 4530, whereas fnex 5876 does not. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	funexw 6274	Weak version of funex 5877 that holds without ax-coll 4204. If the domain and codomain of a function exist, so does the function. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ dom 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	mptexw 6275*	Weak version of mptex 5880 that holds without ax-coll 4204. If the domain and codomain of a function given by maps-to notation are sets, the function is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ V
Theorem	funrnex 6276	If the domain of a function exists, so does its range. Part of Theorem 4.15(v) of [Monk1] p. 46. This theorem is derived using the Axiom of Replacement in the form of funex 5877. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (dom 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵 → (Fun 𝐹 → ran 𝐹 ∈ V))
Theorem	focdmex 6277	If the domain of an onto function exists, so does its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	f1dmex 6278	If the codomain of a one-to-one function exists, so does its domain. This can be thought of as a form of the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	abrexex 6279*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for 𝐵, which can be thought of as 𝐵(𝑥). This simple-looking theorem is actually quite powerful and appears to involve the Axiom of Replacement in an intrinsic way, as can be seen by tracing back through the path mptexg 5879, funex 5877, fnex 5876, resfunexg 5875, and funimaexg 5414. See also abrexex2 6286. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} ∈ V
Theorem	abrexexg 6280*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in 𝐵. The antecedent assures us that 𝐴 is a set. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} ∈ V)
Theorem	iunexg 6281*	The existence of an indexed union. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V)
Theorem	abrexex2g 6282*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝑊) → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabex3d 6283*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Oct-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabex3 6284*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
Theorem	iunex 6285*	The existence of an indexed union. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for 𝐵, which can be read informally as 𝐵(𝑥). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V
Theorem	abrexex2 6286*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. 𝜑 is normally has free-variable parameters 𝑥 and 𝑦. See also abrexex 6279. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	abexssex 6287*	Existence of a class abstraction with an existentially quantified expression. Both 𝑥 and 𝑦 can be free in 𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
Theorem	abexex 6288*	A condition where a class builder continues to exist after its wff is existentially quantified. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	oprabexd 6289*	Existence of an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → ∃*𝑧𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	oprabex 6290*	Existence of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃*𝑧𝜑)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V
Theorem	oprabex3 6291*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻)) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V
Theorem	oprabrexex2 6292*	Existence of an existentially restricted operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	ab2rexex 6293*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. Variables 𝑥 and 𝑦 are normally free-variable parameters in the class expression substituted for 𝐶, which can be thought of as 𝐶(𝑥, 𝑦). See comments for abrexex 6279. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = 𝐶} ∈ V
Theorem	ab2rexex2 6294*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. 𝜑 normally has free-variable parameters 𝑥, 𝑦, and 𝑧. Compare abrexex2 6286. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	xpexgALT 6295	The cross product of two sets is a set. Proposition 6.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. This version is proven using Replacement; see xpexg 4840 for a version that uses the Power Set axiom instead. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	offval3 6296*	General value of (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) with no assumptions on functionality of 𝐹 and 𝐺. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑥))))
Theorem	offres 6297	Pointwise combination commutes with restriction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) ↾ 𝐷) = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷) ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)))
Theorem	ofmres 6298*	Equivalent expressions for a restriction of the function operation map. Unlike ∘𝑓 𝑅 which is a proper class, ( ∘𝑓 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) can be a set by ofmresex 6299, allowing it to be used as a function or structure argument. By ofmresval 6247, the restricted operation map values are the same as the original values, allowing theorems for ∘𝑓 𝑅 to be reused. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ( ∘𝑓 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (𝑓 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑓 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝑔))
Theorem	ofmresex 6299	Existence of a restriction of the function operation map. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( ∘𝑓 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∈ V)
Theorem	uchoice 6300*	Principle of unique choice. This is also called non-choice. The name choice results in its similarity to something like acfun 7422 (with the key difference being the change of ∃ to ∃!) but unique choice in fact follows from the axiom of collection and our other axioms. This is somewhat similar to Corollary 3.9.2 of [HoTT], p. (varies) but is better described by the paragraph at the end of Section 3.9 which starts "A similar issue arises in set-theoretic mathematics". (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Sep-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦𝜑) → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 [(𝑓‘𝑥) / 𝑦]𝜑))