![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 63 of 156) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | op1std 6201 | Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 = 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 → (1st ‘𝐶) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | op2ndd 6202 | Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 = 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 → (2nd ‘𝐶) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | op1stg 6203 | Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (1st ‘〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | op2ndg 6204 | Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (2nd ‘〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | ot1stg 6205 | Extract the first member of an ordered triple. (Due to infrequent usage, it isn't worthwhile at this point to define special extractors for triples, so we reuse the ordered pair extractors for ot1stg 6205, ot2ndg 6206, ot3rdgg 6207.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (1st ‘(1st ‘〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉)) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | ot2ndg 6206 | Extract the second member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 6205 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (2nd ‘(1st ‘〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉)) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | ot3rdgg 6207 | Extract the third member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 6205 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (2nd ‘〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉) = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | 1stval2 6208 | Alternate value of the function that extracts the first member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (i) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) → (1st ‘𝐴) = ∩ ∩ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | 2ndval2 6209 | Alternate value of the function that extracts the second member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (ii) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) → (2nd ‘𝐴) = ∩ ∩ ∩ ◡{𝐴}) | ||
Theorem | fo1st 6210 | The 1st function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ 1st :V–onto→V | ||
Theorem | fo2nd 6211 | The 2nd function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ 2nd :V–onto→V | ||
Theorem | f1stres 6212 | Mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ (1st ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐴 | ||
Theorem | f2ndres 6213 | Mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ (2nd ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐵 | ||
Theorem | fo1stresm 6214* | Onto mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2019.) |
⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → (1st ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐴) | ||
Theorem | fo2ndresm 6215* | Onto mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2019.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (2nd ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐵) | ||
Theorem | 1stcof 6216 | Composition of the first member function with another function. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2007.) |
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝐵 × 𝐶) → (1st ∘ 𝐹):𝐴⟶𝐵) | ||
Theorem | 2ndcof 6217 | Composition of the second member function with another function. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.) |
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝐵 × 𝐶) → (2nd ∘ 𝐹):𝐴⟶𝐶) | ||
Theorem | xp1st 6218 | Location of the first element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → (1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | xp2nd 6219 | Location of the second element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | 1stexg 6220 | Existence of the first member of a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2019.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (1st ‘𝐴) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | 2ndexg 6221 | Existence of the first member of a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2019.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | elxp6 6222 | Membership in a cross product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 5153. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = 〈(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)〉 ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | elxp7 6223 | Membership in a cross product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 5153. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | oprssdmm 6224* | Domain of closure of an operation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Oct-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃𝑣 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⊆ dom 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | eqopi 6225 | Equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶)) → 𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉) | ||
Theorem | xp2 6226* | Representation of cross product based on ordered pair component functions. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ (V × V) ∣ ((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)} | ||
Theorem | unielxp 6227 | The membership relation for a cross product is inherited by union. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝐵 × 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | 1st2nd2 6228 | Reconstruction of a member of a cross product in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → 𝐴 = 〈(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)〉) | ||
Theorem | xpopth 6229 | An ordered pair theorem for members of cross products. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-2007.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐷) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑅 × 𝑆)) → (((1st ‘𝐴) = (1st ‘𝐵) ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = (2nd ‘𝐵)) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | eqop 6230 | Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) → (𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | eqop2 6231 | Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | op1steq 6232* | Two ways of expressing that an element is the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) → ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝑥〉)) | ||
Theorem | 2nd1st 6233 | Swap the members of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → ∪ ◡{𝐴} = 〈(2nd ‘𝐴), (1st ‘𝐴)〉) | ||
Theorem | 1st2nd 6234 | Reconstruction of a member of a relation in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.) |
⊢ ((Rel 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 〈(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)〉) | ||
Theorem | 1stdm 6235 | The first ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the domain of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) → (1st ‘𝐴) ∈ dom 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | 2ndrn 6236 | The second ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the range of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) → (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | 1st2ndbr 6237 | Express an element of a relation as a relationship between first and second components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2016.) |
⊢ ((Rel 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (1st ‘𝐴)𝐵(2nd ‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | releldm2 6238* | Two ways of expressing membership in the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (1st ‘𝑥) = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | reldm 6239* | An expression for the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → dom 𝐴 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (1st ‘𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | sbcopeq1a 6240 | Equality theorem for substitution of a class for an ordered pair (analog of sbceq1a 2995 that avoids the existential quantifiers of copsexg 4273). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → ([(1st ‘𝐴) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝐴) / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | csbopeq1a 6241 | Equality theorem for substitution of a class 𝐴 for an ordered pair 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 in 𝐵 (analog of csbeq1a 3089). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → ⦋(1st ‘𝐴) / 𝑥⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝐴) / 𝑦⦌𝐵 = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | dfopab2 6242* | A way to define an ordered-pair class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∣ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑} | ||
Theorem | dfoprab3s 6243* | A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)} | ||
Theorem | dfoprab3 6244* | Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.) |
⊢ (𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑)} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} | ||
Theorem | dfoprab4 6245* | Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)} | ||
Theorem | dfoprab4f 6246* | Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) (Contributed by NM, 20-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)} | ||
Theorem | dfxp3 6247* | Define the cross product of three classes. Compare df-xp 4665. (Contributed by FL, 6-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶)} | ||
Theorem | elopabi 6248* | A consequence of membership in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = (1st ‘𝐴) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = (2nd ‘𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | eloprabi 6249* | A consequence of membership in an operation class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2006.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑧 = (2nd ‘𝐴) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | mpomptsx 6250* | Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦⦌𝐶) | ||
Theorem | mpompts 6251* | Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦⦌𝐶) | ||
Theorem | dmmpossx 6252* | The domain of a mapping is a subset of its base class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ dom 𝐹 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | fmpox 6253* | Functionality, domain and codomain of a class given by the maps-to notation, where 𝐵(𝑥) is not constant but depends on 𝑥. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝐹:∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵)⟶𝐷) | ||
Theorem | fmpo 6254* | Functionality, domain and range of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐷) | ||
Theorem | fnmpo 6255* | Functionality and domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | mpofvex 6256* | Sufficient condition for an operation maps-to notation to be set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((∀𝑥∀𝑦 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑅𝐹𝑆) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | fnmpoi 6257* | Functionality and domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | dmmpo 6258* | Domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝐴 × 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | mpofvexi 6259* | Sufficient condition for an operation maps-to notation to be set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅𝐹𝑆) ∈ V | ||
Theorem | ovmpoelrn 6260* | An operation's value belongs to its range. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝑂𝑌) ∈ 𝑀) | ||
Theorem | dmmpoga 6261* | Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of dmmpo 6258. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Feb-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝐹 = (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | dmmpog 6262* | Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of dmmpo 6258. Caution: This theorem is only valid in the very special case where the value of the mapping is a constant! (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jun-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Feb-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝐹 = (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | mpoexxg 6263* | Existence of an operation class abstraction (version for dependent domains). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | mpoexg 6264* | Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | mpoexga 6265* | If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the operation is a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2011.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | mpoexw 6266* | Weak version of mpoex 6267 that holds without ax-coll 4144. If the domain and codomain of an operation given by maps-to notation are sets, the operation is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V & ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V | ||
Theorem | mpoex 6267* | If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the operation is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Dec-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V | ||
Theorem | fnmpoovd 6268* | A function with a Cartesian product as domain is a mapping with two arguments defined by its operation values. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2022.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵)) & ⊢ ((𝑖 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝑗 = 𝑏) → 𝐷 = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑖𝑀𝑗) = 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | fmpoco 6269* | Composition of two functions. Variation of fmptco 5724 when the second function has two arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑅 → 𝑆 = 𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑇)) | ||
Theorem | oprabco 6270* | Composition of a function with an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Sep-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐻‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻 Fn 𝐷 → 𝐺 = (𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | oprab2co 6271* | Composition of operator abstractions. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 23-Apr-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐶𝑀𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 Fn (𝑅 × 𝑆) → 𝐺 = (𝑀 ∘ 𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | df1st2 6272* | An alternate possible definition of the 1st function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑥} = (1st ↾ (V × V)) | ||
Theorem | df2nd2 6273* | An alternate possible definition of the 2nd function. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑦} = (2nd ↾ (V × V)) | ||
Theorem | 1stconst 6274 | The mapping of a restriction of the 1st function to a constant function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (1st ↾ (𝐴 × {𝐵})):(𝐴 × {𝐵})–1-1-onto→𝐴) | ||
Theorem | 2ndconst 6275 | The mapping of a restriction of the 2nd function to a converse constant function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2008.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (2nd ↾ ({𝐴} × 𝐵)):({𝐴} × 𝐵)–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
Theorem | dfmpo 6276* | Alternate definition for the maps-to notation df-mpo 5923 (although it requires that 𝐶 be a set). (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝐶〉} | ||
Theorem | cnvf1olem 6277 | Lemma for cnvf1o 6278. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ◡{𝐵})) → (𝐶 ∈ ◡𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 = ∪ ◡{𝐶})) | ||
Theorem | cnvf1o 6278* | Describe a function that maps the elements of a set to its converse bijectively. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}):𝐴–1-1-onto→◡𝐴) | ||
Theorem | f2ndf 6279 | The 2nd (second component of an ordered pair) function restricted to a function 𝐹 is a function from 𝐹 into the codomain of 𝐹. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (2nd ↾ 𝐹):𝐹⟶𝐵) | ||
Theorem | fo2ndf 6280 | The 2nd (second component of an ordered pair) function restricted to a function 𝐹 is a function from 𝐹 onto the range of 𝐹. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (2nd ↾ 𝐹):𝐹–onto→ran 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | f1o2ndf1 6281 | The 2nd (second component of an ordered pair) function restricted to a one-to-one function 𝐹 is a one-to-one function from 𝐹 onto the range of 𝐹. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → (2nd ↾ 𝐹):𝐹–1-1-onto→ran 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | algrflem 6282 | Lemma for algrf and related theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵(𝐹 ∘ 1st )𝐶) = (𝐹‘𝐵) | ||
Theorem | algrflemg 6283 | Lemma for algrf 12183 and related theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵(𝐹 ∘ 1st )𝐶) = (𝐹‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | xporderlem 6284* | Lemma for lexicographical ordering theorems. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Mar-2011.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦))))} ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝑎, 𝑏〉𝑇〈𝑐, 𝑑〉 ↔ (((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑎𝑅𝑐 ∨ (𝑎 = 𝑐 ∧ 𝑏𝑆𝑑)))) | ||
Theorem | poxp 6285* | A lexicographical ordering of two posets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2013.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦))))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Po 𝐵) → 𝑇 Po (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | spc2ed 6286* | Existential specialization with 2 quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Aug-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | cnvoprab 6287* | The converse of a class abstraction of nested ordered pairs. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Aug-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑎 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑎 ∈ (V × V)) ⇒ ⊢ ◡{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑧, 𝑎〉 ∣ 𝜓} | ||
Theorem | f1od2 6288* | Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function of two variables. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Aug-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐼 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ 𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐼 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐽)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)–1-1-onto→𝐷) | ||
Theorem | disjxp1 6289* | The sets of a cartesian product are disjoint if the sets in the first argument are disjoint. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 × 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | disjsnxp 6290* | The sets in the cartesian product of singletons with other sets, are disjoint. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ Disj 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑗} × 𝐵) | ||
The following theorems are about maps-to operations (see df-mpo 5923) where the domain of the second argument depends on the domain of the first argument, especially when the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, in short "x-maps-to operations". For labels, the abbreviations "mpox" are used (since "x" usually denotes the first argument). This is in line with the currently used conventions for such cases (see cbvmpox 5996, ovmpox 6047 and fmpox 6253). If the first argument is an ordered pair, as in the following, the abbreviation is extended to "mpoxop", and the maps-to operations are called "x-op maps-to operations" for short. | ||
Theorem | opeliunxp2f 6291* | Membership in a union of Cartesian products, using bound-variable hypothesis for 𝐸 instead of distinct variable conditions as in opeliunxp2 4802. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐸 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → 𝐵 = 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐸)) | ||
Theorem | mpoxopn0yelv 6292* | If there is an element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, then the second argument is an element of the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (〈𝑉, 𝑊〉𝐹𝐾) → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)) | ||
Theorem | mpoxopoveq 6293* | Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑}) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) → (〈𝑉, 𝑊〉𝐹𝐾) = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [〈𝑉, 𝑊〉 / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑}) | ||
Theorem | mpoxopovel 6294* | Element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens and Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑}) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (〈𝑉, 𝑊〉𝐹𝐾) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [〈𝑉, 𝑊〉 / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑))) | ||
Theorem | rbropapd 6295* | Properties of a pair in an extended binary relation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = {〈𝑓, 𝑝〉 ∣ (𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ 𝜓)}) & ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑃) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐹𝑀𝑃 ↔ (𝐹𝑊𝑃 ∧ 𝜒)))) | ||
Theorem | rbropap 6296* | Properties of a pair in a restricted binary relation 𝑀 expressed as an ordered-pair class abstraction: 𝑀 is the binary relation 𝑊 restricted by the condition 𝜓. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = {〈𝑓, 𝑝〉 ∣ (𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ 𝜓)}) & ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑃) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐹𝑀𝑃 ↔ (𝐹𝑊𝑃 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
Syntax | ctpos 6297 | The transposition of a function. |
class tpos 𝐹 | ||
Definition | df-tpos 6298* | Define the transposition of a function, which is a function 𝐺 = tpos 𝐹 satisfying 𝐺(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝐹(𝑦, 𝑥). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ (◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})) | ||
Theorem | tposss 6299 | Subset theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺 → tpos 𝐹 ⊆ tpos 𝐺) | ||
Theorem | tposeq 6300 | Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |