P. 63 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6201-6300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	caovord3 6201*	Ordering law. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-1996.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐶𝐹𝐷)) → (𝐴𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝐷𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	caovdig 6202*	Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐻(𝑥𝐺𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐻(𝐴𝐺𝐶)))
Theorem	caovdid 6203*	Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐻(𝑥𝐺𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐻(𝐴𝐺𝐶)))
Theorem	caovdir2d 6204*	Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐹(𝑥𝐺𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐺𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐹(𝐵𝐺𝐶)))
Theorem	caovdirg 6205*	Convert an operation reverse distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐾)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑧)𝐻(𝑦𝐺𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐾)) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐺𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐻(𝐵𝐺𝐶)))
Theorem	caovdird 6206*	Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐾)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑧)𝐻(𝑦𝐺𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐺𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐻(𝐵𝐺𝐶)))
Theorem	caovdi 6207*	Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐹(𝑥𝐺𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐹(𝐴𝐺𝐶))
Theorem	caov32d 6208*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	caov12d 6209*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = (𝐵𝐹(𝐴𝐹𝐶)))
Theorem	caov31d 6210*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = ((𝐶𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐴))
Theorem	caov13d 6211*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = (𝐶𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐴)))
Theorem	caov4d 6212*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐶𝐹𝐷)) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐷)))
Theorem	caov411d 6213*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐶𝐹𝐷)) = ((𝐶𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐴𝐹𝐷)))
Theorem	caov42d 6214*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐶𝐹𝐷)) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹(𝐷𝐹𝐵)))
Theorem	caov32 6215*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹𝐵)
Theorem	caov12 6216*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = (𝐵𝐹(𝐴𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	caov31 6217*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = ((𝐶𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐴)
Theorem	caov13 6218*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = (𝐶𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐴))
Theorem	caovdilemd 6219*	Lemma used by real number construction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑧)𝐹(𝑦𝐺𝑧)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐺𝑧)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐹(𝐵𝐺𝐷))𝐺𝐻) = ((𝐴𝐺(𝐶𝐺𝐻))𝐹(𝐵𝐺(𝐷𝐺𝐻))))
Theorem	caovlem2d 6220*	Rearrangement of expression involving multiplication (𝐺) and addition (𝐹). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑧)𝐹(𝑦𝐺𝑧)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐺𝑧)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐹(𝐵𝐺𝐷))𝐺𝐻)𝐹(((𝐴𝐺𝐷)𝐹(𝐵𝐺𝐶))𝐺𝑅)) = ((𝐴𝐺((𝐶𝐺𝐻)𝐹(𝐷𝐺𝑅)))𝐹(𝐵𝐺((𝐶𝐺𝑅)𝐹(𝐷𝐺𝐻)))))
Theorem	caovimo 6221*	Uniqueness of inverse element in commutative, associative operation with identity. The identity element is 𝐵. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Sep-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝑥𝐹𝐵) = 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 → ∃*𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝑤) = 𝐵))
2.6.12  Maps-to notation
Theorem	elmpocl 6222*	If a two-parameter class is inhabited, constrain the implicit pair. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑆𝐹𝑇) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	elmpocl1 6223*	If a two-parameter class is inhabited, the first argument is in its nominal domain. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑆𝐹𝑇) → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	elmpocl2 6224*	If a two-parameter class is inhabited, the second argument is in its nominal domain. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑆𝐹𝑇) → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	elovmpod 6225*	Utility lemma for two-parameter classes. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Jan-2015.) Variant of elovmpo 6226 in deduction form. (Revised by AV, 20-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑌) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 ∈ (𝑋𝑂𝑌) ↔ 𝐸 ∈ 𝐷))
Theorem	elovmpo 6226*	Utility lemma for two-parameter classes. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑌) → 𝐶 = 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐷𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	elovmporab 6227*	Implications for the value of an operation, defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result, having an element. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ∣ 𝜑})    &   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V) → 𝑀 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝑂𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑀))
Theorem	elovmporab1w 6228*	Implications for the value of an operation, defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result, having an element. Here, the base set of the class abstraction depends on the first operand. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (Revised by GG, 26-Jan-2024.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑})    &   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V) → ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝑂𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀))
Theorem	relmptopab 6229*	Any function to sets of ordered pairs produces a relation on function value unconditionally. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Aug-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})    ⇒   ⊢ Rel (𝐹‘𝐵)
Theorem	f1ocnvd 6230*	Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ ◡𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)))
Theorem	f1od 6231*	Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
Theorem	f1ocnv2d 6232*	Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ ◡𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)))
Theorem	f1o2d 6233*	Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
Theorem	f1opw2 6234*	A one-to-one mapping induces a one-to-one mapping on power sets. This version of f1opw 6235 avoids the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐹 “ 𝑎) ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝑏) ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑏)):𝒫 𝐴–1-1-onto→𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	f1opw 6235*	A one-to-one mapping induces a one-to-one mapping on power sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → (𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑏)):𝒫 𝐴–1-1-onto→𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	suppssfv 6236*	Formula building theorem for support restriction, on a function which preserves zero. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (◡(𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐴) “ (V ∖ {𝑌})) ⊆ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑌) = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡(𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝐹‘𝐴)) “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) ⊆ 𝐿)
Theorem	suppssov1 6237*	Formula building theorem for support restrictions: operator with left annihilator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (◡(𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐴) “ (V ∖ {𝑌})) ⊆ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝑌𝑂𝑣) = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡(𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝐴𝑂𝐵)) “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) ⊆ 𝐿)
2.6.13  Function operation
Syntax	cof 6238	Extend class notation to include mapping of an operation to a function operation.
class ∘𝑓 𝑅
Syntax	cofr 6239	Extend class notation to include mapping of a binary relation to a function relation.
class ∘𝑟 𝑅
Definition	df-of 6240*	Define the function operation map. The definition is designed so that if 𝑅 is a binary operation, then ∘𝑓 𝑅 is the analogous operation on functions which corresponds to applying 𝑅 pointwise to the values of the functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ∘𝑓 𝑅 = (𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))))
Definition	df-ofr 6241*	Define the function relation map. The definition is designed so that if 𝑅 is a binary relation, then ∘𝑓 𝑅 is the analogous relation on functions which is true when each element of the left function relates to the corresponding element of the right function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ∘𝑟 𝑅 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔)(𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥)}
Theorem	ofeqd 6242	Equality theorem for function operation, deduction form. (Contributed by SN, 11-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∘𝑓 𝑅 = ∘𝑓 𝑆)
Theorem	ofeq 6243	Equality theorem for function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ∘𝑓 𝑅 = ∘𝑓 𝑆)
Theorem	ofreq 6244	Equality theorem for function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ∘𝑟 𝑅 = ∘𝑟 𝑆)
Theorem	ofexg 6245	A function operation restricted to a set is a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( ∘𝑓 𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	nfof 6246	Hypothesis builder for function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ∘𝑓 𝑅
Theorem	nfofr 6247	Hypothesis builder for function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ∘𝑟 𝑅
Theorem	offval 6248*	Value of an operation applied to two functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ (𝐶𝑅𝐷)))
Theorem	ofrfval 6249*	Value of a relation applied to two functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑅𝐺 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝐶𝑅𝐷))
Theorem	ofvalg 6250	Evaluate a function operation at a point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑋) = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐶𝑅𝐷) ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺)‘𝑋) = (𝐶𝑅𝐷))
Theorem	ofrval 6251	Exhibit a function relation at a point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑋) = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑅𝐺 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐶𝑅𝐷)
Theorem	ofmresval 6252	Value of a restriction of the function operation map. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹( ∘𝑓 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺))
Theorem	off 6253*	The function operation produces a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺):𝐶⟶𝑈)
Theorem	offeq 6254*	Convert an identity of the operation to the analogous identity on the function operation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐶⟶𝑈)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐷𝑅𝐸) = (𝐻‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = 𝐻)
Theorem	ofres 6255	Restrict the operands of a function operation to the same domain as that of the operation itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐶) ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐺 ↾ 𝐶)))
Theorem	offval2 6256*	The function operation expressed as a mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵𝑅𝐶)))
Theorem	ofrfval2 6257*	The function relation acting on maps. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑅𝐺 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵𝑅𝐶))
Theorem	suppssof1 6258*	Formula building theorem for support restrictions: vector operation with left annihilator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐴 “ (V ∖ {𝑌})) ⊆ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝑌𝑂𝑣) = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝐷⟶𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐷⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡(𝐴 ∘𝑓 𝑂𝐵) “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) ⊆ 𝐿)
Theorem	ofco 6259	The composition of a function operation with another function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐷⟶𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) ∘ 𝐻) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐺 ∘ 𝐻)))
Theorem	offveqb 6260*	Equivalent expressions for equality with a function operation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 = (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐵𝑅𝐶)))
Theorem	offveq 6261*	Convert an identity of the operation to the analogous identity on the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵𝑅𝐶) = (𝐻‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = 𝐻)
Theorem	ofc1g 6262	Left operation by a constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵𝑅𝐶) ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐹)‘𝑋) = (𝐵𝑅𝐶))
Theorem	ofc2g 6263	Right operation by a constant. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶𝑅𝐵) ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐵}))‘𝑋) = (𝐶𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	ofc12 6264	Function operation on two constant functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐶})) = (𝐴 × {(𝐵𝑅𝐶)}))
Theorem	caofref 6265*	Transfer a reflexive law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥𝑅𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑅𝐹)
Theorem	caofinvl 6266*	Transfer a left inverse law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁:𝑆⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑁‘(𝐹‘𝑣))))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑁‘𝑥)𝑅𝑥) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐹) = (𝐴 × {𝐵}))
Theorem	caofid0l 6267*	Transfer a left identity law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐵𝑅𝑥) = 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐹) = 𝐹)
Theorem	caofid0r 6268*	Transfer a right identity law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝑅𝐵) = 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐵})) = 𝐹)
Theorem	caofid1 6269*	Transfer a right absorption law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝑅𝐵) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐵})) = (𝐴 × {𝐶}))
Theorem	caofid2 6270*	Transfer a right absorption law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐵𝑅𝑥) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐹) = (𝐴 × {𝐶}))
Theorem	caofcom 6271*	Transfer a commutative law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦) = (𝑦𝑅𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = (𝐺 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐹))
Theorem	caofrss 6272*	Transfer a relation subset law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑇𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑅𝐺 → 𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑇𝐺))
Theorem	caoftrn 6273*	Transfer a transitivity law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑇𝑧) → 𝑥𝑈𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑅𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ∘𝑟 𝑇𝐻) → 𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑈𝐻))
Theorem	caofdig 6274*	Transfer a distributive law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑇𝑦) ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑇(𝑦𝑅𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝑇𝑦)𝑂(𝑥𝑇𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑇(𝐺 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐻)) = ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑇𝐺) ∘𝑓 𝑂(𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑇𝐻)))
2.6.14  Functions (continued)
Theorem	resfunexgALT 6275	The restriction of a function to a set exists. Compare Proposition 6.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 28. This version has a shorter proof than resfunexg 5878 but requires ax-pow 4266 and ax-un 4532. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1995.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	cofunexg 6276	Existence of a composition when the first member is a function. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	cofunex2g 6277	Existence of a composition when the second member is one-to-one. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun ◡𝐵) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	fnexALT 6278	If the domain of a function is a set, the function is a set. Theorem 6.16(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 28. This theorem is derived using the Axiom of Replacement in the form of funimaexg 5416. This version of fnex 5879 uses ax-pow 4266 and ax-un 4532, whereas fnex 5879 does not. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	funexw 6279	Weak version of funex 5882 that holds without ax-coll 4205. If the domain and codomain of a function exist, so does the function. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ dom 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	mptexw 6280*	Weak version of mptex 5885 that holds without ax-coll 4205. If the domain and codomain of a function given by maps-to notation are sets, the function is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ V
Theorem	funrnex 6281	If the domain of a function exists, so does its range. Part of Theorem 4.15(v) of [Monk1] p. 46. This theorem is derived using the Axiom of Replacement in the form of funex 5882. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (dom 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵 → (Fun 𝐹 → ran 𝐹 ∈ V))
Theorem	focdmex 6282	If the domain of an onto function exists, so does its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	f1dmex 6283	If the codomain of a one-to-one function exists, so does its domain. This can be thought of as a form of the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	abrexex 6284*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for 𝐵, which can be thought of as 𝐵(𝑥). This simple-looking theorem is actually quite powerful and appears to involve the Axiom of Replacement in an intrinsic way, as can be seen by tracing back through the path mptexg 5884, funex 5882, fnex 5879, resfunexg 5878, and funimaexg 5416. See also abrexex2 6291. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} ∈ V
Theorem	abrexexg 6285*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in 𝐵. The antecedent assures us that 𝐴 is a set. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} ∈ V)
Theorem	iunexg 6286*	The existence of an indexed union. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V)
Theorem	abrexex2g 6287*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝑊) → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabex3d 6288*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Oct-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabex3 6289*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
Theorem	iunex 6290*	The existence of an indexed union. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for 𝐵, which can be read informally as 𝐵(𝑥). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V
Theorem	abrexex2 6291*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. 𝜑 is normally has free-variable parameters 𝑥 and 𝑦. See also abrexex 6284. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	abexssex 6292*	Existence of a class abstraction with an existentially quantified expression. Both 𝑥 and 𝑦 can be free in 𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
Theorem	abexex 6293*	A condition where a class builder continues to exist after its wff is existentially quantified. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	oprabexd 6294*	Existence of an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → ∃*𝑧𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	oprabex 6295*	Existence of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃*𝑧𝜑)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V
Theorem	oprabex3 6296*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻)) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V
Theorem	oprabrexex2 6297*	Existence of an existentially restricted operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	ab2rexex 6298*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. Variables 𝑥 and 𝑦 are normally free-variable parameters in the class expression substituted for 𝐶, which can be thought of as 𝐶(𝑥, 𝑦). See comments for abrexex 6284. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = 𝐶} ∈ V
Theorem	ab2rexex2 6299*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. 𝜑 normally has free-variable parameters 𝑥, 𝑦, and 𝑧. Compare abrexex2 6291. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	xpexgALT 6300	The cross product of two sets is a set. Proposition 6.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. This version is proven using Replacement; see xpexg 4842 for a version that uses the Power Set axiom instead. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V)