Theorem bnj917 34910

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 34986. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj917.1	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
bnj917.2	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
bnj917.3	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj917.4	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
bnj917.5	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj917	⊢ (𝑦 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑓∃𝑛∃𝑖(𝜒 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛,𝑦   𝐷,𝑖   𝑅,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛,𝑦   𝑓,𝑋,𝑖,𝑛,𝑦   𝜑,𝑖

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑦,𝑓,𝑛)   𝜓(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛)   𝜒(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛)   𝐵(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛)   𝐷(𝑦,𝑓,𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj917

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj917.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
2		bnj917.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
3		bnj917.3	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
4		bnj917.4	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
5		biid 261	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	bnj916 34909	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑓∃𝑛∃𝑖(𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
7		bnj917.5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
8		bnj252 34679	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
9	7, 8	bitri 275	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
10	9	3anbi1i 1157	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)) ↔ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
11		bnj253 34680	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)) ↔ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
12	10, 11	bitr4i 278	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
13	12	3exbii 1848	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑓∃𝑛∃𝑖(𝜒 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)) ↔ ∃𝑓∃𝑛∃𝑖(𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
14	6, 13	sylibr 234	1 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑓∃𝑛∃𝑖(𝜒 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1777   ∈ wcel 2108  {cab 2717  ∀wral 3067  ∃wrex 3076   ∖ cdif 3973  ∅c0 4352  {csn 4648  ∪ ciun 5015  suc csuc 6397   Fn wfn 6568  ‘cfv 6573  ωcom 7903   ∧ w-bnj17 34662   predc-bnj14 34664   trClc-bnj18 34670

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-v 3490  df-iun 5017  df-fn 6576  df-bnj17 34663  df-bnj18 34671

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj981  34926  bnj996  34932