Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  cbvopab2v Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem cbvopab2v 5109
 Description: Rule used to change the second bound variable in an ordered pair abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1999.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
cbvopab2v.1 (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑𝜓))
Assertion
Ref Expression
cbvopab2v {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑧   𝜓,𝑦
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem cbvopab2v
Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 opeq2 4766 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩)
21eqeq2d 2809 . . . . . 6 (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩))
3 cbvopab2v.1 . . . . . 6 (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑𝜓))
42, 3anbi12d 633 . . . . 5 (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
54cbvexvw 2044 . . . 4 (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
65exbii 1849 . . 3 (∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
76abbii 2863 . 2 {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
8 df-opab 5094 . 2 {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
9 df-opab 5094 . 2 {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
107, 8, 93eqtr4i 2831 1 {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1538  ∃wex 1781  {cab 2776  ⟨cop 4531  {copab 5093 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-ext 2770 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-v 3443  df-un 3886  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528  df-op 4532  df-opab 5094 This theorem is referenced by: (None)
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator