Theorem cbvopab2v 5183

Description: Rule used to change the second bound variable in an ordered pair abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1999.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
cbvopab2v.1	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvopab2v	⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑧   𝜓,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑧)

Proof of Theorem cbvopab2v

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opeq2 4840	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩)
2	1	eqeq2d 2771	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩))
3		cbvopab2v.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
4	2, 3	anbi12d 644	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
5	4	cbvexvw 2069	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
6	5	exbii 1880	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
7	6	abbii 2827	. 2 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
8		df-opab 5167	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
9		df-opab 5167	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
10	7, 8, 9	3eqtr4i 2793	1 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569  ∃wex 1811  {cab 2738  ⟨cop 4834  {copab 5166

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-opab 5167

This theorem is used by: (None)