Theorem ccase 1035

Description: Inference for combining cases. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-1999.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Jan-2013.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ccase.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏)
ccase.2	⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏)
ccase.3	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)
ccase.4	⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ccase	⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)

Proof of Theorem ccase

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ccase.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏)
2		ccase.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏)
3	1, 2	jaoian 954	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏)
4		ccase.3	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)
5		ccase.4	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)
6	4, 5	jaoian 954	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)
7	3, 6	jaodan 955	1 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   ∨ wo 844

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845

This theorem is referenced by:  ccased  1036  ccase2  1037  ssprsseq  4758  prel12g  4794  injresinjlem  13507  prodmo  15646  nn0gcdsq  16456  symgextf1  19029  cnmsgnsubg  20782  nn0rppwr  40333  nn0expgcd  40335  dvdsexpnn0  40341  kelac2lem  40889