Theorem ccase 1036

Description: Inference for combining cases. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-1999.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Jan-2013.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ccase.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏)
ccase.2	⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏)
ccase.3	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)
ccase.4	⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ccase	⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)

Proof of Theorem ccase

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ccase.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏)
2		ccase.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏)
3	1, 2	jaoian 955	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏)
4		ccase.3	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)
5		ccase.4	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)
6	4, 5	jaoian 955	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)
7	3, 6	jaodan 956	1 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   ∨ wo 845

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846

This theorem is referenced by:  ccased  1037  ccase2  1038  ssprsseq  4790  prel12g  4826  injresinjlem  13702  prodmo  15830  nn0gcdsq  16638  symgextf1  19217  cnmsgnsubg  21018  nn0rppwr  40877  nn0expgcd  40879  dvdsexpnn0  40885  zaddcom  40979  zmulcom  40983  kelac2lem  41449  omcl3g  41727