Theorem ceqsex2v 3501

Description: Elimination of two existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2006.) Avoid ax-10 2178 and ax-11 2194. (Revised by GG, 20-Aug-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ceqsex2v.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
ceqsex2v.2	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
ceqsex2v.3	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
ceqsex2v.4	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsex2v	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜒)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝜓,𝑥   𝜒,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜓(𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsex2v

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3anass 1111	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
2	1	exbii 1881	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
3		19.42v 1986	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
4	2, 3	bitri 278	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
5	4	exbii 1881	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
6		ceqsex2v.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
7		ceqsex2v.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
8	7	anbi2d 642	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
9	8	exbidv 1954	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
10	6, 9	ceqsexv 3498	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))
11		ceqsex2v.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
12		ceqsex2v.4	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
13	11, 12	ceqsexv 3498	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜒)
14	5, 10, 13	3bitri 300	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜒)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145  Vcvv 3450

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-3an 1105  df-ex 1813  df-clel 2835

This theorem is used by:  ceqsex3v  3502  ceqsex4v  3503  ispos  18449  elfuns  36599  brimg  36621  brapply  36622  lemsuccf  36625  brrestrict  36635  dfrdg4  36637  impprop  38564  diblsmopel  42148