| Mathbox for Andrew Salmon |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > compab | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Two ways of saying "the complement of a class abstraction". (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| compab | ⊢ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | nfcv 2899 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧V | |
| 2 | nfab1 2901 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | nfdif 4083 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| 4 | nfab1 2901 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | cleqf 2928 | . 2 ⊢ ((V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑})) |
| 6 | abid 2719 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) | |
| 7 | 6 | notbii 320 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ¬ 𝜑) |
| 8 | velcomp 3918 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) | |
| 9 | abid 2719 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} ↔ ¬ 𝜑) | |
| 10 | 7, 8, 9 | 3bitr4i 303 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) |
| 11 | 5, 10 | mpgbir 1801 | 1 ⊢ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ↔ wb 206 = wceq 1542 ∈ wcel 2114 {cab 2715 Vcvv 3442 ∖ cdif 3900 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1912 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2010 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2147 ax-11 2163 ax-12 2185 ax-ext 2709 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 849 df-tru 1545 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2812 df-nfc 2886 df-v 3444 df-dif 3906 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |