![]() |
Mathbox for Andrew Salmon |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > compab | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Two ways of saying "the complement of a class abstraction". (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
compab | ⊢ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | nfcv 2905 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧V | |
2 | nfab1 2907 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} | |
3 | 1, 2 | nfdif 4142 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) |
4 | nfab1 2907 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} | |
5 | 3, 4 | cleqf 2934 | . 2 ⊢ ((V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑})) |
6 | abid 2718 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) | |
7 | 6 | notbii 320 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ¬ 𝜑) |
8 | velcomp 3981 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) | |
9 | abid 2718 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} ↔ ¬ 𝜑) | |
10 | 7, 8, 9 | 3bitr4i 303 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) |
11 | 5, 10 | mpgbir 1798 | 1 ⊢ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ↔ wb 206 = wceq 1539 ∈ wcel 2108 {cab 2714 Vcvv 3481 ∖ cdif 3963 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1794 ax-4 1808 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-10 2141 ax-11 2157 ax-12 2177 ax-ext 2708 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 849 df-tru 1542 df-ex 1779 df-nf 1783 df-sb 2065 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2816 df-nfc 2892 df-v 3483 df-dif 3969 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |