| Mathbox for Andrew Salmon |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > compab | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Two ways of saying "the complement of a class abstraction". (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| compab | ⊢ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | nfcv 2923 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧V | |
| 2 | nfab1 2925 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | nfdif 4083 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| 4 | nfab1 2925 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | cleqf 2951 | . 2 ⊢ ((V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑})) |
| 6 | abid 2743 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) | |
| 7 | 6 | notbii 322 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ¬ 𝜑) |
| 8 | velcomp 3919 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) | |
| 9 | abid 2743 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} ↔ ¬ 𝜑) | |
| 10 | 7, 8, 9 | 3bitr4i 305 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) |
| 11 | 5, 10 | mpgbir 1818 | 1 ⊢ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ↔ wb 208 = wceq 1559 ∈ wcel 2141 {cab 2739 Vcvv 3453 ∖ cdif 3901 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1814 ax-4 1828 ax-5 1929 ax-6 1986 ax-7 2027 ax-8 2143 ax-9 2151 ax-10 2174 ax-11 2190 ax-12 2211 ax-ext 2733 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 400 df-or 859 df-tru 1562 df-ex 1799 df-nf 1803 df-sb 2090 df-clab 2740 df-cleq 2753 df-clel 2836 df-nfc 2910 df-v 3455 df-dif 3907 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |