P. 433 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 43201-43300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	relexpmulg 43201	With ordered exponents, the composition of powers of a relation is the relation raised to the product of exponents. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = (𝐽 · 𝐾) ∧ (𝐼 = 0 → 𝐽 ≤ 𝐾)) ∧ (𝐽 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)) → ((𝑅↑𝑟𝐽)↑𝑟𝐾) = (𝑅↑𝑟𝐼))
Theorem	trclrelexplem 43202*	The union of relational powers to positive multiples of 𝑁 is a subset to the transitive closure raised to the power of 𝑁. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∪ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐷↑𝑟𝑘)↑𝑟𝑁) ⊆ (∪ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ (𝐷↑𝑟𝑗)↑𝑟𝑁))
Theorem	iunrelexpmin2 43203*	The indexed union of relation exponentiation over the natural numbers (including zero) is the minimum reflexive-transitive relation that includes the relation. (Contributed by RP, 4-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 = ℕ0) → ∀𝑠((( I ↾ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑠 ∧ (𝑠 ∘ 𝑠) ⊆ 𝑠) → (𝐶‘𝑅) ⊆ 𝑠))
Theorem	relexp01min 43204	With exponents limited to 0 and 1, the composition of powers of a relation is the relation raised to the minimum of exponents. (Contributed by RP, 12-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = if(𝐽 < 𝐾, 𝐽, 𝐾)) ∧ (𝐽 ∈ {0, 1} ∧ 𝐾 ∈ {0, 1})) → ((𝑅↑𝑟𝐽)↑𝑟𝐾) = (𝑅↑𝑟𝐼))
Theorem	relexp1idm 43205	Repeated raising a relation to the first power is idempotent. (Contributed by RP, 12-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑅↑𝑟1)↑𝑟1) = (𝑅↑𝑟1))
Theorem	relexp0idm 43206	Repeated raising a relation to the zeroth power is idempotent. (Contributed by RP, 12-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑅↑𝑟0)↑𝑟0) = (𝑅↑𝑟0))
Theorem	relexp0a 43207	Absorption law for zeroth power of a relation. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴↑𝑟𝑁)↑𝑟0) ⊆ (𝐴↑𝑟0))
Theorem	relexpxpmin 43208	The composition of powers of a Cartesian product of non-disjoint sets is the Cartesian product raised to the minimum exponent. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ≠ ∅) ∧ (𝐼 = if(𝐽 < 𝐾, 𝐽, 𝐾) ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)) → (((𝐴 × 𝐵)↑𝑟𝐽)↑𝑟𝐾) = ((𝐴 × 𝐵)↑𝑟𝐼))
Theorem	relexpaddss 43209	The composition of two powers of a relation is a subset of the relation raised to the sum of those exponents. This is equality where 𝑅 is a relation as shown by relexpaddd 15028 or when the sum of the powers isn't 1 as shown by relexpaddg 15027. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ∘ (𝑅↑𝑟𝑀)) ⊆ (𝑅↑𝑟(𝑁 + 𝑀)))
Theorem	iunrelexpuztr 43210*	The indexed union of relation exponentiation over upper integers is a transive relation. Generalized from rtrclreclem3 15034. (Contributed by RP, 4-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐶‘𝑅) ∘ (𝐶‘𝑅)) ⊆ (𝐶‘𝑅))
21.34.5.4  Transitive closure of a relation
Theorem	dftrcl3 43211*	Transitive closure of a relation, expressed as indexed union of powers of relations. (Contributed by RP, 5-Jun-2020.)
⊢ t+ = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))
Theorem	brfvtrcld 43212*	If two elements are connected by the transitive closure of a relation, then they are connected via 𝑛 instances the relation, for some counting number 𝑛. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝐴(𝑅↑𝑟𝑛)𝐵))
Theorem	fvtrcllb1d 43213	A set is a subset of its image under the transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (t+‘𝑅))
Theorem	trclfvcom 43214	The transitive closure of a relation commutes with the relation. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ((t+‘𝑅) ∘ 𝑅) = (𝑅 ∘ (t+‘𝑅)))
Theorem	cnvtrclfv 43215	The converse of the transitive closure is equal to the transitive closure of the converse relation. (Contributed by RP, 19-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ◡(t+‘𝑅) = (t+‘◡𝑅))
Theorem	cotrcltrcl 43216	The transitive closure is idempotent. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (t+ ∘ t+) = t+
Theorem	trclimalb2 43217	Lower bound for image under a transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑅 “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝐵) → ((t+‘𝑅) “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	brtrclfv2 43218*	Two ways to indicate two elements are related by the transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 ↔ 𝑌 ∈ ∩ {𝑓 ∣ (𝑅 “ ({𝑋} ∪ 𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑓}))
Theorem	trclfvdecomr 43219	The transitive closure of a relation may be decomposed into a union of the relation and the composition of the relation with its transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (t+‘𝑅) = (𝑅 ∪ ((t+‘𝑅) ∘ 𝑅)))
Theorem	trclfvdecoml 43220	The transitive closure of a relation may be decomposed into a union of the relation and the composition of the relation with its transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (t+‘𝑅) = (𝑅 ∪ (𝑅 ∘ (t+‘𝑅))))
Theorem	dmtrclfvRP 43221	The domain of the transitive closure is equal to the domain of the relation. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → dom (t+‘𝑅) = dom 𝑅)
Theorem	rntrclfvRP 43222	The range of the transitive closure is equal to the range of the relation. (Contributed by RP, 19-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ran (t+‘𝑅) = ran 𝑅)
Theorem	rntrclfv 43223	The range of the transitive closure is equal to the range of the relation. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ran (t+‘𝑅) = ran 𝑅)
Theorem	dfrtrcl3 43224*	Reflexive-transitive closure of a relation, expressed as indexed union of powers of relations. Generalized from dfrtrcl2 15036. (Contributed by RP, 5-Jun-2020.)
⊢ t* = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))
Theorem	brfvrtrcld 43225*	If two elements are connected by the reflexive-transitive closure of a relation, then they are connected via 𝑛 instances the relation, for some natural number 𝑛. Similar of dfrtrclrec2 15032. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t*‘𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝐴(𝑅↑𝑟𝑛)𝐵))
Theorem	fvrtrcllb0d 43226	A restriction of the identity relation is a subset of the reflexive-transitive closure of a set. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( I ↾ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ⊆ (t*‘𝑅))
Theorem	fvrtrcllb0da 43227	A restriction of the identity relation is a subset of the reflexive-transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ⊆ (t*‘𝑅))
Theorem	fvrtrcllb1d 43228	A set is a subset of its image under the reflexive-transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (t*‘𝑅))
Theorem	dfrtrcl4 43229	Reflexive-transitive closure of a relation, expressed as the union of the zeroth power and the transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 5-Jun-2020.)
⊢ t* = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑟↑𝑟0) ∪ (t+‘𝑟)))
Theorem	corcltrcl 43230	The composition of the reflexive and transitive closures is the reflexive-transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (r* ∘ t+) = t*
Theorem	cortrcltrcl 43231	Composition with the reflexive-transitive closure absorbs the transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (t* ∘ t+) = t*
Theorem	corclrtrcl 43232	Composition with the reflexive-transitive closure absorbs the reflexive closure. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (r* ∘ t*) = t*
Theorem	cotrclrcl 43233	The composition of the reflexive and transitive closures is the reflexive-transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 21-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (t+ ∘ r*) = t*
Theorem	cortrclrcl 43234	Composition with the reflexive-transitive closure absorbs the reflexive closure. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (t* ∘ r*) = t*
Theorem	cotrclrtrcl 43235	Composition with the reflexive-transitive closure absorbs the transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (t+ ∘ t*) = t*
Theorem	cortrclrtrcl 43236	The reflexive-transitive closure is idempotent. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (t* ∘ t*) = t*
21.34.5.5  Adapted from Frege Theorems inspired by Begriffsschrift without restricting form and content to closely parallel those in [Frege1879].
Theorem	frege77d 43237	If the images of both {𝐴} and 𝑈 are subsets of 𝑈 and 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then 𝐵 is an element of 𝑈. Similar to Proposition 77 of [Frege1879] p. 62. Compare with frege77 43431. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	frege81d 43238	If the image of 𝑈 is a subset 𝑈, 𝐴 is an element of 𝑈 and 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then 𝐵 is an element of 𝑈. Similar to Proposition 81 of [Frege1879] p. 63. Compare with frege81 43435. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	frege83d 43239	If the image of the union of 𝑈 and 𝑉 is a subset of the union of 𝑈 and 𝑉, 𝐴 is an element of 𝑈 and 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then 𝐵 is an element of the union of 𝑈 and 𝑉. Similar to Proposition 83 of [Frege1879] p. 65. Compare with frege83 43437. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ (𝑈 ∪ 𝑉)) ⊆ (𝑈 ∪ 𝑉))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝑈 ∪ 𝑉))
Theorem	frege96d 43240	If 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 follows 𝐶 in 𝑅, then 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 96 of [Frege1879] p. 71. Compare with frege96 43450. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)
Theorem	frege87d 43241	If the images of both {𝐴} and 𝑈 are subsets of 𝑈 and 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 follows 𝐶 in 𝑅, then 𝐵 is an element of 𝑈. Similar to Proposition 87 of [Frege1879] p. 66. Compare with frege87 43441. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	frege91d 43242	If 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in 𝑅 then 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 91 of [Frege1879] p. 68. Comparw with frege91 43445. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)
Theorem	frege97d 43243	If 𝐴 contains all elements after those in 𝑈 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then the image under 𝑅 of 𝐴 is a subclass of 𝐴. Similar to Proposition 97 of [Frege1879] p. 71. Compare with frege97 43451. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((t+‘𝑅) “ 𝑈))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	frege98d 43244	If 𝐶 follows 𝐴 and 𝐵 follows 𝐶 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 98 of [Frege1879] p. 71. Compare with frege98 43452. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)
Theorem	frege102d 43245	If either 𝐴 and 𝐶 are the same or 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 is the successor to 𝐶, then 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 102 of [Frege1879] p. 72. Compare with frege102 43456. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)
Theorem	frege106d 43246	If 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in 𝑅, then either 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 106 of [Frege1879] p. 73. Compare with frege106 43460. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	frege108d 43247	If either 𝐴 and 𝐶 are the same or 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 is the successor to 𝐶, then either 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 108 of [Frege1879] p. 74. Compare with frege108 43462. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	frege109d 43248	If 𝐴 contains all elements of 𝑈 and all elements after those in 𝑈 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then the image under 𝑅 of 𝐴 is a subclass of 𝐴. Similar to Proposition 109 of [Frege1879] p. 74. Compare with frege109 43463. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑈 ∪ ((t+‘𝑅) “ 𝑈)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	frege114d 43249	If either 𝑅 relates 𝐴 and 𝐵 or 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same, then either 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same, 𝑅 relates 𝐴 and 𝐵, 𝑅 relates 𝐵 and 𝐴. Similar to Proposition 114 of [Frege1879] p. 76. Compare with frege114 43468. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	frege111d 43250	If either 𝐴 and 𝐶 are the same or 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 is the successor to 𝐶, then either 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same or 𝐴 follows 𝐵 or 𝐵 and 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 111 of [Frege1879] p. 75. Compare with frege111 43465. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵(t+‘𝑅)𝐴))
Theorem	frege122d 43251	If 𝐹 is a function, 𝐴 is the successor of 𝑋, and 𝐵 is the successor of 𝑋, then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same (or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹). Similar to Proposition 122 of [Frege1879] p. 79. Compare with frege122 43476. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐹‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝐹‘𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	frege124d 43252	If 𝐹 is a function, 𝐴 is the successor of 𝑋, and 𝐵 follows 𝑋 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹. Similar to Proposition 124 of [Frege1879] p. 80. Compare with frege124 43478. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐹‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝐹)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	frege126d 43253	If 𝐹 is a function, 𝐴 is the successor of 𝑋, and 𝐵 follows 𝑋 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, then (for distinct 𝐴 and 𝐵) either 𝐴 follows 𝐵 or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹. Similar to Proposition 126 of [Frege1879] p. 81. Compare with frege126 43480. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐹‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝐹)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵(t+‘𝐹)𝐴))
Theorem	frege129d 43254	If 𝐹 is a function and (for distinct 𝐴 and 𝐵) either 𝐴 follows 𝐵 or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, the successor of 𝐴 is either 𝐵 or it follows 𝐵 or it comes before 𝐵 in the transitive closure of 𝐹. Similar to Proposition 129 of [Frege1879] p. 83. Comparw with frege129 43483. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐹‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵(t+‘𝐹)𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵(t+‘𝐹)𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶(t+‘𝐹)𝐵))
Theorem	frege131d 43255	If 𝐹 is a function and 𝐴 contains all elements of 𝑈 and all elements before or after those elements of 𝑈 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, then the image under 𝐹 of 𝐴 is a subclass of 𝐴. Similar to Proposition 131 of [Frege1879] p. 85. Compare with frege131 43485. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑈 ∪ ((◡(t+‘𝐹) “ 𝑈) ∪ ((t+‘𝐹) “ 𝑈))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	frege133d 43256	If 𝐹 is a function and 𝐴 and 𝐵 both follow 𝑋 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, then (for distinct 𝐴 and 𝐵) either 𝐴 follows 𝐵 or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹 (or both if it loops). Similar to Proposition 133 of [Frege1879] p. 86. Compare with frege133 43487. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝐹)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝐹)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵(t+‘𝐹)𝐴))
21.34.6  Propositions from _Begriffsschrift_ In 1879, Frege introduced notation for documenting formal reasoning about propositions (and classes) which covered elements of propositional logic, predicate calculus and reasoning about relations. However, due to the pitfalls of naive set theory, adapting this work for inclusion in set.mm required dividing statements about propositions from those about classes and identifying when a restriction to sets is required. For an overview comparing the details of Frege's two-dimensional notation and that used in set.mm, see mmfrege.html. See ru 3769 for discussion of an example of a class that is not a set. Numbered propositions from [Frege1879]. ax-frege1 43281, ax-frege2 43282, ax-frege8 43300, ax-frege28 43321, ax-frege31 43325, ax-frege41 43336, frege52 (see ax-frege52a 43348, frege52b 43380, and ax-frege52c 43379 for translations), frege54 (see ax-frege54a 43353, frege54b 43384 and ax-frege54c 43383 for translations) and frege58 (see ax-frege58a 43366, ax-frege58b 43392 and frege58c 43412 for translations) are considered "core" or axioms. However, at least ax-frege8 43300 can be derived from ax-frege1 43281 and ax-frege2 43282, see axfrege8 43298. Frege introduced implication, negation and the universal quantifier as primitives and did not in the numbered propositions use other logical connectives other than equivalence introduced in ax-frege52a 43348, frege52b 43380, and ax-frege52c 43379. In dffrege69 43423, Frege introduced 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 to say that relation 𝑅, when restricted to operate on elements of class 𝐴, will only have elements of class 𝐴 in its domain; see df-he 43264 for a definition in terms of image and subset. In dffrege76 43430, Frege introduced notation for the concept of two sets related by the transitive closure of a relation, for which we write 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌, which requires 𝑅 to also be a set. In dffrege99 43453, Frege introduced notation for the concept of two sets either identical or related by the transitive closure of a relation, for which we write 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑌, which is a superclass of sets related by the reflexive-transitive relation 𝑋(t*‘𝑅)𝑌. Finally, in dffrege115 43469, Frege introduced notation for the concept of a relation having the property elements in its domain pair up with only one element each in its range, for which we write Fun ◡◡𝑅 (to ignore any non-relational content of the class 𝑅). Frege did this without the expressing concept of a relation (or its transitive closure) as a class, and needed to invent conventions for discussing indeterminate propositions with two slots free and how to recognize which of the slots was domain and which was range. See mmfrege.html 43469 for details. English translations for specific propositions lifted in part from a translation by Stefan Bauer-Mengelberg as reprinted in From Frege to Goedel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931. An attempt to align these propositions in the larger set.mm database has also been made. See frege77d 43237 for an example.
21.34.6.1  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter I Section 2 introduces the turnstile ⊢ which turns an idea which may be true 𝜑 into an assertion that it does hold true ⊢ 𝜑. Section 5 introduces implication, (𝜑 → 𝜓). Section 6 introduces the single rule of interference relied upon, modus ponens ax-mp 5. Section 7 introduces negation and with in synonyms for or (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓), and ¬ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓), and two for exclusive-or corresponding to df-or 846, df-an 395, dfxor4 43257, dfxor5 43258. Section 8 introduces the problematic notation for identity of conceptual content which must be separated into cases for biconditional (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) or class equality 𝐴 = 𝐵 in this adaptation. Section 10 introduces "truth functions" for one or two variables in equally troubling notation, as the arguments may be understood to be logical predicates or collections. Here f(𝜑) is interpreted to mean if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) where the content of the "function" is specified by the latter two argments or logical equivalent, while g(𝐴) is read as 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 and h(𝐴, 𝐵) as 𝐴𝐻𝐵. This necessarily introduces a need for set theory as both 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 and 𝐴𝐻𝐵 cannot hold unless 𝐴 is a set. (Also 𝐵.) Section 11 introduces notation for generality, but there is no standard notation for generality when the variable is a proposition because it was realized after Frege that the universe of all possible propositions includes paradoxical constructions leading to the failure of naive set theory. So adopting f(𝜑) as if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) would result in the translation of ∀𝜑 f (𝜑) as (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒). For collections, we must generalize over set variables or run into the same problems; this leads to ∀𝐴 g(𝐴) being translated as ∀𝑎𝑎 ∈ 𝐺 and so forth. Under this interpreation the text of section 11 gives us sp 2171 (or simpl 481 and simpr 483 and anifp 1069 in the propositional case) and statements similar to cbvalivw 2002, ax-gen 1789, alrimiv 1922, and alrimdv 1924. These last four introduce a generality and have no useful definition in terms of propositional variables. Section 12 introduces some combinations of primitive symbols and their human language counterparts. Using class notation, these can also be expressed without dummy variables. All are A, ∀𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 alex 1820, 𝐴 = V eqv 3472; Some are not B, ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, ∃𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 exnal 1821, 𝐵 ⊊ V pssv 4443, 𝐵 ≠ V nev 43261; There are no C, ∀𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, ¬ ∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 alnex 1775, 𝐶 = ∅ eq0 4340; There exist D, ¬ ∀𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷, ∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 df-ex 1774, ∅ ⊊ 𝐷 0pss 4441, 𝐷 ≠ ∅ n0 4343. Notation for relations between expressions also can be written in various ways. All E are P, ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) dfss6 3963, 𝐸 = (𝐸 ∩ 𝑃) dfss2 3959, 𝐸 ⊆ 𝑃 df-ss 3958; No F are P, ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) alinexa 1837, (𝐹 ∩ 𝑃) = ∅ disj1 4447; Some G are not P, ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐺 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) exanali 1854, (𝐺 ∩ 𝑃) ⊊ 𝐺 nssinpss 4252, ¬ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝑃 nss 4038; Some H are P, ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) exnalimn 1838, ∅ ⊊ (𝐻 ∩ 𝑃) 0pssin 43262, (𝐻 ∩ 𝑃) ≠ ∅ ndisj 4364.
Theorem	dfxor4 43257	Express exclusive-or in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 12. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ¬ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	dfxor5 43258	Express exclusive-or in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 12. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) → ¬ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	df3or2 43259	Express triple-or in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 25-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	df3an2 43260	Express triple-and in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 12. (Contributed by RP, 25-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒)))
Theorem	nev 43261*	Express that not every set is in a class. (Contributed by RP, 16-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ V ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	0pssin 43262*	Express that an intersection is not empty. (Contributed by RP, 16-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (∅ ⊊ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
21.34.6.2  _Begriffsschrift_ Notation hints The statement 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 means relation 𝑅 is hereditary (in the sense of Frege) in the class 𝐴 or (𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴. The former is only a slight reduction in the number of symbols, but this reduces the number of floating hypotheses needed to be checked. As Frege was not using the language of classes or sets, this naturally differs from the set-theoretic notion that a set is hereditary in a property: that all of its elements have a property and all of their elements have the property and so-on.
Syntax	whe 43263	The property of relation 𝑅 being hereditary in class 𝐴.
wff 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴
Definition	df-he 43264	The property of relation 𝑅 being hereditary in class 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	dfhe2 43265	The property of relation 𝑅 being hereditary in class 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴))
Theorem	dfhe3 43266*	The property of relation 𝑅 being hereditary in class 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	heeq12 43267	Equality law for relations being herditary over a class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 hereditary 𝐵))
Theorem	heeq1 43268	Equality law for relations being herditary over a class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 hereditary 𝐴))
Theorem	heeq2 43269	Equality law for relations being herditary over a class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 hereditary 𝐵))
Theorem	sbcheg 43270	Distribute proper substitution through herditary relation. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 hereditary 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 hereditary ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
Theorem	hess 43271	Subclass law for relations being herditary over a class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑅 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → 𝑆 hereditary 𝐴))
Theorem	xphe 43272	Any Cartesian product is hereditary in its second class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 3-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) hereditary 𝐵
Theorem	0he 43273	The empty relation is hereditary in any class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ∅ hereditary 𝐴
Theorem	0heALT 43274	The empty relation is hereditary in any class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ∅ hereditary 𝐴
Theorem	he0 43275	Any relation is hereditary in the empty set. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 hereditary ∅
Theorem	unhe1 43276	The union of two relations hereditary in a class is also hereditary in a class. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 hereditary 𝐴) → (𝑅 ∪ 𝑆) hereditary 𝐴)
Theorem	snhesn 43277	Any singleton is hereditary in any singleton. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ {⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩} hereditary {𝐵}
Theorem	idhe 43278	The identity relation is hereditary in any class. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ I hereditary 𝐴
Theorem	psshepw 43279	The relation between sets and their proper subsets is hereditary in the powerclass of any class. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ◡ [⊊] hereditary 𝒫 𝐴
Theorem	sshepw 43280	The relation between sets and their subsets is hereditary in the powerclass of any class. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (◡ [⊊] ∪ I ) hereditary 𝒫 𝐴
21.34.6.3  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter II Implication
Axiom	ax-frege1 43281	The case in which 𝜑 is denied, 𝜓 is affirmed, and 𝜑 is affirmed is excluded. This is evident since 𝜑 cannot at the same time be denied and affirmed. Axiom 1 of [Frege1879] p. 26. Identical to ax-1 6. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
Axiom	ax-frege2 43282	If a proposition 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of two propositions 𝜓 and 𝜑 and one of those, 𝜓, is in turn a necessary consequence of the other, 𝜑, then the proposition 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of the latter one, 𝜑, alone. Axiom 2 of [Frege1879] p. 26. Identical to ax-2 7. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	rp-simp2-frege 43283	Simplification of triple conjunction. Compare with simp2 1134. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	rp-simp2 43284	Simplification of triple conjunction. Identical to simp2 1134. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜓)
Theorem	rp-frege3g 43285	Add antecedent to ax-frege2 43282. More general statement than frege3 43286. Like ax-frege2 43282, it is essentially a closed form of mpd 15, however it has an extra antecedent. It would be more natural to prove from a1i 11 and ax-frege2 43282 in Metamath. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege3 43286	Add antecedent to ax-frege2 43282. Special case of rp-frege3g 43285. Proposition 3 of [Frege1879] p. 29. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → ((𝜒 → 𝜑) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))))
Theorem	rp-misc1-frege 43287	Double-use of ax-frege2 43282. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	rp-frege24 43288	Introducing an embedded antecedent. Alternate proof for frege24 43306. Closed form for a1d 25. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	rp-frege4g 43289	Deduction related to distribution. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege4 43290	Special case of closed form of a2d 29. Special case of rp-frege4g 43289. Proposition 4 of [Frege1879] p. 31. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → 𝜑) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))))
Theorem	frege5 43291	A closed form of syl 17. Identical to imim2 58. Theorem *2.05 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 100. Proposition 5 of [Frege1879] p. 32. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → 𝜑) → (𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	rp-7frege 43292	Distribute antecedent and add another. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜃 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	rp-4frege 43293	Elimination of a nested antecedent of special form. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))
Theorem	rp-6frege 43294	Elimination of a nested antecedent of special form. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → 𝜃)) → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))
Theorem	rp-8frege 43295	Eliminate antecedent when it is implied by previous antecedent. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))
Theorem	rp-frege25 43296	Closed form for a1dd 50. Alternate route to Proposition 25 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	frege6 43297	A closed form of imim2d 57 which is a deduction adding nested antecedents. Proposition 6 of [Frege1879] p. 33. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	axfrege8 43298	Swap antecedents. Identical to pm2.04 90. This demonstrates that Axiom 8 of [Frege1879] p. 35 is redundant. Proof follows closely proof of pm2.04 90 in https://us.metamath.org/mmsolitaire/pmproofs.txt 90, but in the style of Frege's 1879 work. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege7 43299	A closed form of syl6 35. The first antecedent is used to replace the consequent of the second antecedent. Proposition 7 of [Frege1879] p. 34. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜑)) → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜓))))
Axiom	ax-frege8 43300	Swap antecedents. If two conditions have a proposition as a consequence, their order is immaterial. Third axiom of Frege's 1879 work but identical to pm2.04 90 which can be proved from only ax-mp 5, ax-frege1 43281, and ax-frege2 43282. (Redundant) Axiom 8 of [Frege1879] p. 35. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))