P. 433 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 43201-43300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	onsupnmax 43201	If the union of a class of ordinals is not the maximum element of that class, then the union is a limit ordinal or empty. But this isn't a biconditional since 𝐴 could be a non-empty set where a limit ordinal or the empty set happens to be the largest element. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (¬ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴 → ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ 𝐴))
Theorem	onsupuni 43202	The supremum of a set of ordinals is the union of that set. Lemma 2.10 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 19-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → sup(𝐴, On, E ) = ∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	onsupuni2 43203	The supremum of a set of ordinals is the union of that set. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 On → sup(𝐴, On, E ) = ∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	onsupintrab 43204*	The supremum of a set of ordinals is the intersection of every ordinal greater-than-or-equal to every member of the set. Definition 2.9 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → sup(𝐴, On, E ) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥})
Theorem	onsupintrab2 43205*	The supremum of a set of ordinals is the intersection of every ordinal greater-than-or-equal to every member of the set. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 On → sup(𝐴, On, E ) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥})
Theorem	onsupcl3 43206*	The supremum of a set of ordinals is an ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥} ∈ On)
Theorem	onsupex3 43207*	The supremum of a set of ordinals exists. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥} ∈ V)
Theorem	onuniintrab2 43208*	The union of a set of ordinals is the intersection of every ordinal greater-than-or-equal to every member of the set. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 On → ∪ 𝐴 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥})
Theorem	oninfint 43209	The infimum of a non-empty class of ordinals is the intersection of that class. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → inf(𝐴, On, E ) = ∩ 𝐴)
Theorem	oninfunirab 43210*	The infimum of a non-empty class of ordinals is the union of every ordinal less-than-or-equal to every element of that class. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → inf(𝐴, On, E ) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦})
Theorem	oninfcl2 43211*	The infimum of a non-empty class of ordinals is an ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∪ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦} ∈ On)
Theorem	onsupmaxb 43212	The union of a class of ordinals is an element is an element of that class if and only if there is a maximum element of that class under the epsilon relation, which is to say that the domain of the restricted epsilon relation is not the whole class. (Contributed by RP, 25-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (dom ( E ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = 𝐴 ↔ ¬ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	onexgt 43213*	For any ordinal, there is always a larger ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 1-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	onexomgt 43214*	For any ordinal, there is always a larger product of omega. (Contributed by RP, 1-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ∈ (ω ·o 𝑥))
Theorem	omlimcl2 43215	The product of a limit ordinal with any nonzero ordinal is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ Lim 𝐵)) ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) → Lim (𝐵 ·o 𝐴))
Theorem	onexlimgt 43216*	For any ordinal, there is always a larger limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 1-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 ∈ On (Lim 𝑥 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	onexoegt 43217*	For any ordinal, there is always a larger power of omega. (Contributed by RP, 1-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑥))
Theorem	oninfex2 43218*	The infimum of a non-empty class of ordinals exists. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∪ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦} ∈ V)
Theorem	onsupeqmax 43219*	Condition when the supremum of a set of ordinals is the maximum element of that set. (Contributed by RP, 24-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥 ↔ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	onsupeqnmax 43220*	Condition when the supremum of a class of ordinals is not the maximum element of that class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (∪ 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	onsuplub 43221*	The supremum of a set of ordinals is the least upper bound. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑧))
Theorem	onsupnub 43222*	An upper bound of a set of ordinals is not less than the supremum. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ On ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	onfisupcl 43223	Sufficient condition when the supremum of a set of ordinals is the maximum element of that set. See ordunifi 9195. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	onelord 43224	Every element of a ordinal is an ordinal. Lemma 1.3 of [Schloeder] p. 1. Based on onelon 6336 and eloni 6321. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵)
Theorem	onepsuc 43225	Every ordinal is less than its successor, relationship version. Lemma 1.7 of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝐴 E suc 𝐴)
Theorem	epsoon 43226	The ordinals are strictly and completely (linearly) ordered. Theorem 1.9 of [Schloeder] p. 1. Based on epweon 7715 and weso 5614. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ E Or On
Theorem	epirron 43227	The strict order on the ordinals is irreflexive. Theorem 1.9(i) of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ¬ 𝐴 E 𝐴)
Theorem	oneptr 43228	The strict order on the ordinals is transitive. Theorem 1.9(ii) of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 E 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 E 𝐶) → 𝐴 E 𝐶))
Theorem	oneltr 43229	The elementhood relation on the ordinals is transitive. Theorem 1.9(ii) of [Schloeder] p. 1. See ontr1 6358. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	oneptri 43230	The strict, complete (linear) order on the ordinals is complete. Theorem 1.9(iii) of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 E 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 E 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	ordeldif 43231	Membership in the difference of ordinals. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)))
Theorem	ordeldifsucon 43232	Membership in the difference of ordinal and successor ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ suc 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	ordeldif1o 43233	Membership in the difference of ordinal and ordinal one. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 1o) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)))
Theorem	ordne0gt0 43234	Ordinal zero is less than every non-zero ordinal. Theorem 1.10 of [Schloeder] p. 2. Closely related to ord0eln0 6367. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∅ ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	ondif1i 43235	Ordinal zero is less than every non-zero ordinal, class difference version. Theorem 1.10 of [Schloeder] p. 2. See ondif1 8426. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) → ∅ ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	onsucelab 43236*	The successor of every ordinal is an element of the class of successor ordinals. Definition 1.11 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → suc 𝐴 ∈ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝑎 = suc 𝑏})
Theorem	dflim6 43237*	A limit ordinal is a non-zero ordinal which is not a successor ordinal. Definition 1.11 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 ↔ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑏))
Theorem	limnsuc 43238*	A limit ordinal is not an element of the class of successor ordinals. Definition 1.11 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝑎 = suc 𝑏})
Theorem	onsucss 43239	If one ordinal is less than another, then the successor of the first is less than or equal to the second. Lemma 1.13 of [Schloeder] p. 2. See ordsucss 7757. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))
Theorem	ordnexbtwnsuc 43240*	For any distinct pair of ordinals, if there is no ordinal between the lesser and the greater, the greater is the successor of the lesser. Lemma 1.16 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (∀𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐵 = suc 𝐴))
Theorem	orddif0suc 43241	For any distinct pair of ordinals, if the set difference between the greater and the successor of the lesser is empty, the greater is the successor of the lesser. Lemma 1.16 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → ((𝐵 ∖ suc 𝐴) = ∅ → 𝐵 = suc 𝐴))
Theorem	onsucf1lem 43242*	For ordinals, the successor operation is injective, so there is at most one ordinal that a given ordinal could be the successor of. Lemma 1.17 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃*𝑏 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑏)
Theorem	onsucf1olem 43243*	The successor operation is bijective between the ordinals and the class of successor ordinals. Lemma 1.17 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴) → ∃!𝑏 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑏)
Theorem	onsucrn 43244*	The successor operation is surjective onto its range, the class of successor ordinals. Lemma 1.17 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ On ↦ suc 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ ran 𝐹 = {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝑎 = suc 𝑏}
Theorem	onsucf1o 43245*	The successor operation is a bijective function between the ordinals and the class of successor ordinals. Lemma 1.17 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ On ↦ suc 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:On–1-1-onto→{𝑎 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝑎 = suc 𝑏}
Theorem	dflim7 43246*	A limit ordinal is a non-zero ordinal that contains all the successors of its elements. Lemma 1.18 of [Schloeder] p. 2. Closely related to dflim4 7788. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 ↔ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅))
Theorem	onov0suclim 43247	Compactly express rules for binary operations on ordinals. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ⊗ ∅) = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊗ suc 𝐶) = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) ∧ Lim 𝐵) → (𝐴 ⊗ 𝐵) = 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 ⊗ 𝐵) = 𝐷) ∧ ((𝐵 = suc 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊗ 𝐵) = 𝐸) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ⊗ 𝐵) = 𝐹)))
Theorem	oa0suclim 43248*	Closed form expression of the value of ordinal addition for the cases when the second ordinal is zero, a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal. Definition 2.3 of [Schloeder] p. 4. See oa0 8441, oasuc 8449, and oalim 8457. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐵 = suc 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = suc (𝐴 +o 𝐶)) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 +o 𝑐))))
Theorem	om0suclim 43249*	Closed form expression of the value of ordinal multiplication for the cases when the second ordinal is zero, a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal. Definition 2.5 of [Schloeder] p. 4. See om0 8442, omsuc 8451, and omlim 8458. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = ∅) ∧ ((𝐵 = suc 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ·o 𝐶) +o 𝐴)) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ·o 𝑐))))
Theorem	oe0suclim 43250*	Closed form expression of the value of ordinal exponentiation for the cases when the second ordinal is zero, a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal. Definition 2.6 of [Schloeder] p. 4. See oe0 8447, oesuc 8452, oe0m1 8446, and oelim 8459. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) = 1o) ∧ ((𝐵 = suc 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ↑o 𝐶) ·o 𝐴)) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) = if(∅ ∈ 𝐴, ∪ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ↑o 𝑐), ∅))))
Theorem	oaomoecl 43251	The operations of addition, multiplication, and exponentiation are closed. Remark 2.8 of [Schloeder] p. 5. See oacl 8460, omcl 8461, oecl 8462. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ On ∧ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ On ∧ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ On))
Theorem	onsupsucismax 43252*	If the union of a set of ordinals is a successor ordinal, then that union is the maximum element of the set. This is not a bijection because sets where the maximum element is zero or a limit ordinal exist. Lemma 2.11 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (∃𝑏 ∈ On ∪ 𝐴 = suc 𝑏 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	onsssupeqcond 43253*	If for every element of a set of ordinals there is an element of a subset which is at least as large, then the union of the set and the subset is the same. Lemma 2.12 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑎 ⊆ 𝑏) → ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝐵))
Theorem	limexissup 43254	An ordinal which is a limit ordinal is equal to its supremum. Lemma 2.13 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 = sup(𝐴, On, E ))
Theorem	limiun 43255*	A limit ordinal is the union of its elements, indexed union version. Lemma 2.13 of [Schloeder] p. 5. See limuni 6373. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 → 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥)
Theorem	limexissupab 43256*	An ordinal which is a limit ordinal is equal to the supremum of the class of all its elements. Lemma 2.13 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 = sup({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}, On, E ))
Theorem	om1om1r 43257	Ordinal one is both a left and right identity of ordinal multiplication. Lemma 2.15 of [Schloeder] p. 5. See om1 8467 and om1r 8468 for individual statements. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ((1o ·o 𝐴) = (𝐴 ·o 1o) ∧ (𝐴 ·o 1o) = 𝐴))
Theorem	oe0rif 43258	Ordinal zero raised to any non-zero ordinal power is zero and zero to the zeroth power is one. Lemma 2.18 of [Schloeder] p. 6. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (∅ ↑o 𝐴) = if(∅ ∈ 𝐴, ∅, 1o))
Theorem	oasubex 43259*	While subtraction can't be a binary operation on ordinals, for any pair of ordinals there exists an ordinal that can be added to the lessor (or equal) one which will sum to the greater. Theorem 2.19 of [Schloeder] p. 6. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝑐 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 +o 𝑐) = 𝐴))
Theorem	nnamecl 43260	Natural numbers are closed under ordinal addition, multiplication, and exponentiation. Theorem 2.20 of [Schloeder] p. 6. See nnacl 8536, nnmcl 8537, nnecl 8538. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → ((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ ω ∧ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ ω ∧ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ ω))
Theorem	onsucwordi 43261	The successor operation preserves the less-than-or-equal relationship between ordinals. Lemma 3.1 of [Schloeder] p. 7. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵))
Theorem	oalim2cl 43262	The ordinal sum of any ordinal with a limit ordinal on the right is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 6-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ Lim 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → Lim (𝐴 +o 𝐵))
Theorem	oaltublim 43263	Given 𝐶 is a limit ordinal, the sum of any ordinal with an ordinal less than 𝐶 is less than the sum of the first ordinal with 𝐶. Lemma 3.5 of [Schloeder] p. 7. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (Lim 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 +o 𝐶))
Theorem	oaordi3 43264	Ordinal addition of the same number on the left preserves the ordering of the numbers on the right. Lemma 3.6 of [Schloeder] p. 8. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 +o 𝐶)))
Theorem	oaord3 43265	When the same ordinal is added on the left, ordering of the sums is equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the right. Theorem 3.7 of [Schloeder] p. 8. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 +o 𝐶)))
Theorem	1oaomeqom 43266	Ordinal one plus omega is equal to omega. See oaabs 8573 for the sum of any natural number on the left and ordinal at least as large as omega on the right. Lemma 3.8 of [Schloeder] p. 8. See oaabs2 8574 where a power of omega is the upper bound of the left and a lower bound on the right. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (1o +o ω) = ω
Theorem	oaabsb 43267	The right addend absorbs the sum with an ordinal iff that ordinal times omega is less than or equal to the right addend. (Contributed by RP, 19-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 ·o ω) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = 𝐵))
Theorem	oaordnrex 43268	When omega is added on the right to ordinals zero and one, ordering of the sums is not equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the left. Remark 3.9 of [Schloeder] p. 8. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ¬ (∅ ∈ 1o ↔ (∅ +o ω) ∈ (1o +o ω))
Theorem	oaordnr 43269*	When the same ordinal is added on the right, ordering of the sums is not equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the left. Remark 3.9 of [Schloeder] p. 8. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ∃𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑎 +o 𝑐) ∈ (𝑏 +o 𝑐))
Theorem	omge1 43270	Any non-zero ordinal product is greater-than-or-equal to the term on the left. Lemma 3.11 of [Schloeder] p. 8. See omword1 8498. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵))
Theorem	omge2 43271	Any non-zero ordinal product is greater-than-or-equal to the term on the right. Lemma 3.12 of [Schloeder] p. 9. See omword2 8499. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵))
Theorem	omlim2 43272	The non-zero product with an limit ordinal on the right is a limit ordinal. Lemma 3.13 of [Schloeder] p. 9. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)) → Lim (𝐴 ·o 𝐵))
Theorem	omord2lim 43273	Given a limit ordinal, the product of any non-zero ordinal with an ordinal less than that limit ordinal is less than the product of the non-zero ordinal with the limit ordinal . Lemma 3.14 of [Schloeder] p. 9. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ (Lim 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ·o 𝐶)))
Theorem	omord2i 43274	Ordinal multiplication of the same non-zero number on the left preserves the ordering of the numbers on the right. Lemma 3.15 of [Schloeder] p. 9. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ·o 𝐶)))
Theorem	omord2com 43275	When the same non-zero ordinal is multiplied on the left, ordering of the products is equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the right. Theorem 3.16 of [Schloeder] p. 9. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ·o 𝐶)))
Theorem	2omomeqom 43276	Ordinal two times omega is omega. Lemma 3.17 of [Schloeder] p. 10. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (2o ·o ω) = ω
Theorem	omnord1ex 43277	When omega is multiplied on the right to ordinals one and two, ordering of the products is not equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the left. Remark 3.18 of [Schloeder] p. 10. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ¬ (1o ∈ 2o ↔ (1o ·o ω) ∈ (2o ·o ω))
Theorem	omnord1 43278*	When the same non-zero ordinal is multiplied on the right, ordering of the products is not equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the left. Remark 3.18 of [Schloeder] p. 10. (Contributed by RP, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ∃𝑐 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ¬ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑎 ·o 𝑐) ∈ (𝑏 ·o 𝑐))
Theorem	oege1 43279	Any non-zero ordinal power is greater-than-or-equal to the term on the left. Lemma 3.19 of [Schloeder] p. 10. See oewordi 8516. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))
Theorem	oege2 43280	Any power of an ordinal at least as large as two is greater-than-or-equal to the term on the right. Lemma 3.20 of [Schloeder] p. 10. See oeworde 8518. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))
Theorem	rp-oelim2 43281	The power of an ordinal at least as large as two with a limit ordinal on thr right is a limit ordinal. Lemma 3.21 of [Schloeder] p. 10. See oelimcl 8525. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)) → Lim (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))
Theorem	oeord2lim 43282	Given a limit ordinal, the power of any base at least as large as two raised to an ordinal less than that limit ordinal is less than the power of that base raised to the limit ordinal . Lemma 3.22 of [Schloeder] p. 10. See oeordi 8512. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (Lim 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐶)))
Theorem	oeord2i 43283	Ordinal exponentiation of the same base at least as large as two preserves the ordering of the exponents. Lemma 3.23 of [Schloeder] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐶)))
Theorem	oeord2com 43284	When the same base at least as large as two is raised to ordinal powers, , ordering of the power is equivalent to the ordering of the exponents. Theorem 3.24 of [Schloeder] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐶)))
Theorem	nnoeomeqom 43285	Any natural number at least as large as two raised to the power of omega is omega. Lemma 3.25 of [Schloeder] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ↑o ω) = ω)
Theorem	df3o2 43286	Ordinal 3 is the unordered triple containing ordinals 0, 1, and 2. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 3o = {∅, 1o, 2o}
Theorem	df3o3 43287	Ordinal 3, fully expanded. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 3o = {∅, {∅}, {∅, {∅}}}
Theorem	oenord1ex 43288	When ordinals two and three are both raised to the power of omega, ordering of the powers is not equivalent to the ordering of the bases. Remark 3.26 of [Schloeder] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ¬ (2o ∈ 3o ↔ (2o ↑o ω) ∈ (3o ↑o ω))
Theorem	oenord1 43289*	When two ordinals (both at least as large as two) are raised to the same power, ordering of the powers is not equivalent to the ordering of the bases. Remark 3.26 of [Schloeder] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ (On ∖ 2o)∃𝑏 ∈ (On ∖ 2o)∃𝑐 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ¬ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑎 ↑o 𝑐) ∈ (𝑏 ↑o 𝑐))
Theorem	oaomoencom 43290*	Ordinal addition, multiplication, and exponentiation do not generally commute. Theorem 4.1 of [Schloeder] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ¬ (𝑎 +o 𝑏) = (𝑏 +o 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ¬ (𝑎 ·o 𝑏) = (𝑏 ·o 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ¬ (𝑎 ↑o 𝑏) = (𝑏 ↑o 𝑎))
Theorem	oenassex 43291	Ordinal two raised to two to the zeroth power is not the same as two squared then raised to the zeroth power. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ¬ (2o ↑o (2o ↑o ∅)) = ((2o ↑o 2o) ↑o ∅)
Theorem	oenass 43292*	Ordinal exponentiation is not associative. Remark 4.6 of [Schloeder] p. 14. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ∃𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝑎 ↑o (𝑏 ↑o 𝑐)) = ((𝑎 ↑o 𝑏) ↑o 𝑐)
Theorem	cantnftermord 43293	For terms of the form of a power of omega times a non-zero natural number, ordering of the exponents implies ordering of the terms. Lemma 5.1 of [Schloeder] p. 15. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o))) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((ω ↑o 𝐴) ·o 𝐶) ∈ ((ω ↑o 𝐵) ·o 𝐷)))
Theorem	cantnfub 43294*	Given a finite number of terms of the form ((ω ↑o (𝐴‘𝑛)) ·o (𝑀‘𝑛)) with distinct exponents, we may order them from largest to smallest and find the sum is less than (ω ↑o 𝑋) when (𝐴‘𝑛) is less than 𝑋 and (𝑀‘𝑛) is less than ω. Lemma 5.2 of [Schloeder] p. 15. (Contributed by RP, 31-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝑁–1-1→𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝑁⟶ω)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐴, (𝑀‘(◡𝐴‘𝑥)), ∅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom (ω CNF 𝑋) ∧ ((ω CNF 𝑋)‘𝐹) ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑋)))
Theorem	cantnfub2 43295*	Given a finite number of terms of the form ((ω ↑o (𝐴‘𝑛)) ·o (𝑀‘𝑛)) with distinct exponents, we may order them from largest to smallest and find the sum is less than (ω ↑o suc ∪ ran 𝐴) when (𝑀‘𝑛) is less than ω. Lemma 5.2 of [Schloeder] p. 15. (Contributed by RP, 9-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝑁–1-1→On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝑁⟶ω)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ suc ∪ ran 𝐴 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐴, (𝑀‘(◡𝐴‘𝑥)), ∅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (suc ∪ ran 𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐹 ∈ dom (ω CNF suc ∪ ran 𝐴) ∧ ((ω CNF suc ∪ ran 𝐴)‘𝐹) ∈ (ω ↑o suc ∪ ran 𝐴)))
Theorem	bropabg 43296*	Equivalence for two classes related by an ordered-pair class abstraction. A generalization of brsslt 27714. (Contributed by RP, 26-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	cantnfresb 43297*	A Cantor normal form which sums to less than a certain power has only zeros for larger components. (Contributed by RP, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (On ∖ 2o) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐹 ∈ dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵))) → (((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐹) ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)(𝐹‘𝑥) = ∅))
Theorem	cantnf2 43298*	For every ordinal, 𝐴, there is a an ordinal exponent 𝑏 such that 𝐴 is less than (ω ↑o 𝑏) and for every ordinal at least as large as 𝑏 there is a unique Cantor normal form, 𝑓, with zeros for all the unnecessary higher terms, that sums to 𝐴. Theorem 5.3 of [Schloeder] p. 16. (Contributed by RP, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑏 ∈ On ∀𝑐 ∈ (On ∖ 𝑏)∃!𝑓 ∈ dom (ω CNF 𝑐)((𝐴 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑏) ∧ 𝑓 finSupp ∅) ∧ (((ω CNF 𝑏)‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑏)) = 𝐴 ∧ ((ω CNF 𝑐)‘𝑓) = 𝐴)))
21.36.2  Natural addition of Cantor normal forms
Theorem	oawordex2 43299*	If 𝐶 is between 𝐴 (inclusive) and (𝐴 +o 𝐵) (exclusive), there is an ordinal which equals 𝐶 when summed to 𝐴. This is a slightly different statement than oawordex 8482 or oawordeu 8480. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +o 𝐵))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 +o 𝑥) = 𝐶)
Theorem	nnawordexg 43300*	If an ordinal, 𝐵, is in a half-open interval between some 𝐴 and the next limit ordinal, 𝐵 is the sum of the 𝐴 and some natural number. This weakens the antecedent of nnawordex 8562. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 +o ω)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐴 +o 𝑥) = 𝐵)