Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > elxpi | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Membership in a Cartesian product. Uses fewer axioms than elxp 5603. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elxpi | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | eqeq1 2742 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ↔ 𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉)) | |
2 | 1 | anbi1d 629 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)))) |
3 | 2 | 2exbidv 1928 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)))) |
4 | df-xp 5586 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)} | |
5 | df-opab 5133 | . . . 4 ⊢ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} | |
6 | 4, 5 | eqtri 2766 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} |
7 | 3, 6 | elab2g 3604 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)))) |
8 | 7 | ibi 266 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1539 ∃wex 1783 ∈ wcel 2108 {cab 2715 〈cop 4564 {copab 5132 × cxp 5578 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1799 ax-4 1813 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-ext 2709 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-tru 1542 df-ex 1784 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2730 df-clel 2817 df-opab 5133 df-xp 5586 |
This theorem is referenced by: xpdifid 6060 opreuopreu 7849 djuunxp 9610 fmla0xp 33245 mnringmulrcld 41735 rrx2plordisom 45957 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |