Theorem equvel 2459

Description: A variable elimination law for equality with no distinct variable requirements. Compare equvini 2458. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2375. Use equvelv 2029 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 15-Jun-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
equvel	⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem equvel

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		albi 1817	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑦) → (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦))
2		ax6e 2386	. . . 4 ⊢ ∃𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦
3		biimpr 220	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑦) → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑥))
4		ax7 2014	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
5	3, 4	syli 39	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑦) → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
6	5	com12 32	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ((𝑧 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
7	2, 6	eximii 1836	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑧((𝑧 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
8	7	19.35i 1877	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦)
9	4	spsd 2186	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
10	9	sps 2184	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
11	10	a1dd 50	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
12		nfeqf 2384	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦)
13	12	19.9d 2202	. . . 4 ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) → (∃𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
14	13	ex 412	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
15	11, 14	bija 380	. 2 ⊢ ((∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) → (∃𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
16	1, 8, 15	sylc 65	1 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1537  ∃wex 1778

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2006  ax-10 2140  ax-12 2176  ax-13 2375

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1779  df-nf 1783

This theorem is referenced by: (None)