Theorem nfopabd 5173

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for class abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfopabd.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
nfopabd.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
nfopabd.4	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfopabd	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)

Proof of Theorem nfopabd

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-opab 5168	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
2		nfv 1947	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑
3		nfopabd.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
4		nfopabd.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
5		nfvd 1948	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
6		nfopabd.4	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜓)
7	5, 6	nfand 1930	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
8	4, 7	nfexd 2360	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
9	3, 8	nfexd 2360	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
10	2, 9	nfabdw 2944	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧{𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)})
11	1, 10	nfcxfrd 2922	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812  Ⅎwnf 1816  {cab 2739  Ⅎwnfc 2908  ⟨cop 4590  {copab 5167

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-opab 5168

This theorem is used by:  nfopab  5174  nfttrcld  9711