Theorem nic-ax 1703

Description: Nicod's axiom derived from the standard ones. See Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy by B. Russell, p. 152. Like meredith 1671, the usual axioms can be derived from this and vice versa. Unlike meredith 1671, Nicod uses a different connective ('nand'), so another form of modus ponens must be used in proofs, e.g., { nic-ax 1703, nic-mp 1701 } is equivalent to { luk-1 1685, luk-2 1686, luk-3 1687, ax-mp 5 }. In a pure (standalone) treatment of Nicod's axiom, this theorem would be changed to an axiom ($a statement). (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 19-Nov-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nic-ax	⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)) ⊼ ((𝜏 ⊼ (𝜏 ⊼ 𝜏)) ⊼ ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃)))))

Proof of Theorem nic-ax

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nannan 1527	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)))
2	1	biimpi 219	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)))
3		simpl 487	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
4	3	imim2i 17	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))
5		imnan 404	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜃 → ¬ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜒))
6		df-nan 1522	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜒))
7	5, 6	bitr4i 281	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜃 → ¬ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒))
8		con3 154	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → (¬ 𝜒 → ¬ 𝜑))
9	8	imim2d 58	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → ((𝜃 → ¬ 𝜒) → (𝜃 → ¬ 𝜑)))
10		imnan 404	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜃) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜃))
11		con2b 362	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜃 → ¬ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜃))
12		df-nan 1522	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜃))
13	10, 11, 12	3bitr4ri 307	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜃 → ¬ 𝜑))
14	9, 13	imbitrrdi 255	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → ((𝜃 → ¬ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃)))
15	7, 14	biimtrrid 246	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃)))
16		nanim 1528	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃)) ↔ ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃))))
17	15, 16	sylib 221	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃))))
18	2, 4, 17	3syl 19	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)) → ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃))))
19		pm4.24 573	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜏))
20	19	biimpi 219	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜏 → (𝜏 ∧ 𝜏))
21		nannan 1527	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜏 ⊼ (𝜏 ⊼ 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜏 → (𝜏 ∧ 𝜏)))
22	20, 21	mpbir 234	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜏 ⊼ (𝜏 ⊼ 𝜏))
23	18, 22	jctil 528	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)) → ((𝜏 ⊼ (𝜏 ⊼ 𝜏)) ∧ ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃)))))
24		nannan 1527	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)) ⊼ ((𝜏 ⊼ (𝜏 ⊼ 𝜏)) ⊼ ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃))))) ↔ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)) → ((𝜏 ⊼ (𝜏 ⊼ 𝜏)) ∧ ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃))))))
25	23, 24	mpbir 234	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)) ⊼ ((𝜏 ⊼ (𝜏 ⊼ 𝜏)) ⊼ ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃)))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ⊼ wnan 1521

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-nan 1522

This theorem is referenced by:  nic-imp  1705  nic-idlem1  1706  nic-idlem2  1707  nic-id  1708  nic-swap  1709  nic-luk1  1721  lukshef-ax1  1724