Theorem nic-ax 1696

Description: Nicod's axiom derived from the standard ones. See Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy by B. Russell, p. 152. Like meredith 1664, the usual axioms can be derived from this and vice versa. Unlike meredith 1664, Nicod uses a different connective ('nand'), so another form of modus ponens must be used in proofs, e.g., { nic-ax 1696, nic-mp 1694 } is equivalent to { luk-1 1678, luk-2 1679, luk-3 1680, ax-mp 5 }. In a pure (standalone) treatment of Nicod's axiom, this theorem would be changed to an axiom ($a statement). (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 19-Nov-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nic-ax	⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)) ⊼ ((𝜏 ⊼ (𝜏 ⊼ 𝜏)) ⊼ ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃)))))

Proof of Theorem nic-ax

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nannan 1520	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)))
2	1	biimpi 219	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)))
3		simpl 487	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
4	3	imim2i 17	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))
5		imnan 404	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜃 → ¬ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜒))
6		df-nan 1515	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜒))
7	5, 6	bitr4i 281	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜃 → ¬ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒))
8		con3 154	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → (¬ 𝜒 → ¬ 𝜑))
9	8	imim2d 58	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → ((𝜃 → ¬ 𝜒) → (𝜃 → ¬ 𝜑)))
10		imnan 404	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜃) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜃))
11		con2b 362	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜃 → ¬ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜃))
12		df-nan 1515	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜃))
13	10, 11, 12	3bitr4ri 307	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜃 → ¬ 𝜑))
14	9, 13	imbitrrdi 255	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → ((𝜃 → ¬ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃)))
15	7, 14	biimtrrid 246	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃)))
16		nanim 1521	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃)) ↔ ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃))))
17	15, 16	sylib 221	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃))))
18	2, 4, 17	3syl 19	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)) → ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃))))
19		pm4.24 573	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜏))
20	19	biimpi 219	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜏 → (𝜏 ∧ 𝜏))
21		nannan 1520	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜏 ⊼ (𝜏 ⊼ 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜏 → (𝜏 ∧ 𝜏)))
22	20, 21	mpbir 234	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜏 ⊼ (𝜏 ⊼ 𝜏))
23	18, 22	jctil 528	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)) → ((𝜏 ⊼ (𝜏 ⊼ 𝜏)) ∧ ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃)))))
24		nannan 1520	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)) ⊼ ((𝜏 ⊼ (𝜏 ⊼ 𝜏)) ⊼ ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃))))) ↔ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)) → ((𝜏 ⊼ (𝜏 ⊼ 𝜏)) ∧ ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃))))))
25	23, 24	mpbir 234	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)) ⊼ ((𝜏 ⊼ (𝜏 ⊼ 𝜏)) ⊼ ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃)))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ⊼ wnan 1514

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-nan 1515

This theorem is referenced by:  nic-imp  1698  nic-idlem1  1699  nic-idlem2  1700  nic-id  1701  nic-swap  1702  nic-luk1  1714  lukshef-ax1  1717