| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rabss3d | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Subclass law for restricted abstraction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Sep-2017.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabss3d.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabss3d | ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓}) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | nfv 1914 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 | |
| 2 | nfrab1 3457 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} | |
| 3 | nfrab1 3457 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓} | |
| 4 | rabss3d.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) | |
| 5 | simprr 773 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜓) | |
| 6 | 4, 5 | jca 511 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) |
| 7 | 6 | ex 412 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))) |
| 8 | rabid 3458 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
| 9 | rabid 3458 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
| 10 | 7, 8, 9 | 3imtr4g 296 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} → 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})) |
| 11 | 1, 2, 3, 10 | ssrd 3988 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓}) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 395 ∈ wcel 2108 {crab 3436 ⊆ wss 3951 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-10 2141 ax-11 2157 ax-12 2177 ax-ext 2708 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 849 df-tru 1543 df-ex 1780 df-nf 1784 df-sb 2065 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2816 df-nfc 2892 df-rab 3437 df-ss 3968 |
| This theorem is referenced by: xpinpreima2 33906 reprss 34632 reprinfz1 34637 unitscyglem2 42197 unitscyglem4 42199 unitscyglem5 42200 upwrdfi 46902 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |