| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 41 of 499) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30893) |
(30894-32416) |
(32417-49836) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | ssrexf 4001 | Restricted existential quantification follows from a subclass relationship. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ssrmof 4002 | "At most one" existential quantification restricted to a subclass. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ssralv 4003* | Quantification restricted to a subclass. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2006.) Avoid axioms. (Revised by GG, 19-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ssrexv 4004* | Existential quantification restricted to a subclass. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2007.) Avoid axioms. (Revised by GG, 19-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ss2ralv 4005* | Two quantifications restricted to a subclass. (Contributed by AV, 11-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ss2rexv 4006* | Two existential quantifications restricted to a subclass. (Contributed by AV, 11-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ssralvOLD 4007* | Obsolete version of ssralv 4003 as of 19-May-2025. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ssrexvOLD 4008* | Obsolete version of ssrexv 4004 as of 19-May-2025. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ralss 4009* | Restricted universal quantification on a subset in terms of superset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) Avoid axioms. (Revised by SN, 14-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | rexss 4010* | Restricted existential quantification on a subset in terms of superset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) Avoid axioms. (Revised by SN, 14-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | ralssOLD 4011* | Obsolete version of ralss 4009 as of 14-Oct-2025. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | rexssOLD 4012* | Obsolete version of rexss 4010 as of 14-Oct-2025. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | ss2ab 4013 | Class abstractions in a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-1994.) |
| ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | abss 4014* | Class abstraction in a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2006.) |
| ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ssab 4015* | Subclass of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ssabral 4016* | The relation for a subclass of a class abstraction is equivalent to restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 6-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ss2abdv 4017* | Deduction of abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 28-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | ss2abi 4018 | Inference of abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1995.) Avoid ax-8 2113, ax-10 2144, ax-11 2160, ax-12 2180. (Revised by GG, 28-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} | ||
| Theorem | abssdv 4019* | Deduction of abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-2006.) (Proof shortened by SN, 22-Dec-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | abssi 4020* | Inference of abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | ss2rab 4021 | Restricted abstraction classes in a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | rabss 4022* | Restricted class abstraction in a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2006.) |
| ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ssrab 4023* | Subclass of a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ssrabdv 4024* | Subclass of a restricted class abstraction (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) | ||
| Theorem | rabssdv 4025* | Subclass of a restricted class abstraction (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ss2rabdv 4026* | Deduction of restricted abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | ss2rabi 4027 | Inference of restricted abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} | ||
| Theorem | rabss2 4028* | Subclass law for restricted abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | ssab2 4029* | Subclass relation for the restriction of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1995.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | ssrab2 4030* | Subclass relation for a restricted class. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by BJ and SN, 8-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | rabss3d 4031* | Subclass law for restricted abstraction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓}) | ||
| Theorem | ssrab3 4032* | Subclass relation for a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | rabssrabd 4033* | Subclass of a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | ssrabeq 4034* | If the restricting class of a restricted class abstraction is a subset of this restricted class abstraction, it is equal to this restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑉 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | rabssab 4035 | A restricted class is a subclass of the corresponding unrestricted class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} | ||
| Theorem | eqrrabd 4036* | Deduce equality with a restricted abstraction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) | ||
| Theorem | uniiunlem 4037* | A subset relationship useful for converting union to indexed union using dfiun2 4982 or dfiun2g 4980 and intersection to indexed intersection using dfiin2 4983. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} ⊆ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | dfpss2 4038 | Alternate definition of proper subclass. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | dfpss3 4039 | Alternate definition of proper subclass. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | psseq1 4040 | Equality theorem for proper subclass. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | psseq2 4041 | Equality theorem for proper subclass. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ⊊ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ⊊ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | psseq1i 4042 | An equality inference for the proper subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | psseq2i 4043 | An equality inference for the proper subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ⊊ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ⊊ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | psseq12i 4044 | An equality inference for the proper subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | psseq1d 4045 | An equality deduction for the proper subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | psseq2d 4046 | An equality deduction for the proper subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ⊊ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ⊊ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | psseq12d 4047 | An equality deduction for the proper subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | pssss 4048 | A proper subclass is a subclass. Theorem 10 of [Suppes] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pssne 4049 | Two classes in a proper subclass relationship are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pssssd 4050 | Deduce subclass from proper subclass. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pssned 4051 | Proper subclasses are unequal. Deduction form of pssne 4049. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | sspss 4052 | Subclass in terms of proper subclass. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | pssirr 4053 | Proper subclass is irreflexive. Theorem 7 of [Suppes] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | pssn2lp 4054 | Proper subclass has no 2-cycle loops. Compare Theorem 8 of [Suppes] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ¬ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sspsstri 4055 | Two ways of stating trichotomy with respect to inclusion. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ssnpss 4056 | Partial trichotomy law for subclasses. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | psstr 4057 | Transitive law for proper subclass. Theorem 9 of [Suppes] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | sspsstr 4058 | Transitive law for subclass and proper subclass. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1996.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | psssstr 4059 | Transitive law for subclass and proper subclass. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1996.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | psstrd 4060 | Proper subclass inclusion is transitive. Deduction form of psstr 4057. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | sspsstrd 4061 | Transitivity involving subclass and proper subclass inclusion. Deduction form of sspsstr 4058. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | psssstrd 4062 | Transitivity involving subclass and proper subclass inclusion. Deduction form of psssstr 4059. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | npss 4063 | A class is not a proper subclass of another iff it satisfies a one-directional form of eqss 3950. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ssnelpss 4064 | A subclass missing a member is a proper subclass. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2002.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ssnelpssd 4065 | Subclass inclusion with one element of the superclass missing is proper subclass inclusion. Deduction form of ssnelpss 4064. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ssexnelpss 4066* | If there is an element of a class which is not contained in a subclass, the subclass is a proper subclass. (Contributed by AV, 29-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ∉ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dfdif3 4067* | Alternate definition of class difference. (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 16-Jun-2022.) (Proof shortened by SN, 15-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦} | ||
| Theorem | dfdif3OLD 4068* | Obsolete version of dfdif3 4067 as of 15-Aug-2025. (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 16-Jun-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦} | ||
| Theorem | difeq1 4069 | Equality theorem for class difference. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | difeq2 4070 | Equality theorem for class difference. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | difeq12 4071 | Equality theorem for class difference. (Contributed by FL, 31-Aug-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | difeq1i 4072 | Inference adding difference to the right in a class equality. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2002.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | difeq2i 4073 | Inference adding difference to the left in a class equality. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2002.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | difeq12i 4074 | Equality inference for class difference. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | difeq1d 4075 | Deduction adding difference to the right in a class equality. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2002.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | difeq2d 4076 | Deduction adding difference to the left in a class equality. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2002.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | difeq12d 4077 | Equality deduction for class difference. (Contributed by FL, 29-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | difeqri 4078* | Inference from membership to difference. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = 𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | nfdif 4079 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for class difference. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-10 2144, ax-11 2160, ax-12 2180. (Revised by SN, 14-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | nfdifOLD 4080 | Obsolete version of nfdif 4079 as of 14-May-2025. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | eldifi 4081 | Implication of membership in a class difference. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | eldifn 4082 | Implication of membership in a class difference. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | elndif 4083 | A set does not belong to a class excluding it. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | neldif 4084 | Implication of membership in a class difference. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-1994.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | difdif 4085 | Double class difference. Exercise 11 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | difss 4086 | Subclass relationship for class difference. Exercise 14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | difssd 4087 | A difference of two classes is contained in the minuend. Deduction form of difss 4086. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | difss2 4088 | If a class is contained in a difference, it is contained in the minuend. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | difss2d 4089 | If a class is contained in a difference, it is contained in the minuend. Deduction form of difss2 4088. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ssdifss 4090 | Preservation of a subclass relationship by class difference. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ddif 4091 | Double complement under universal class. Exercise 4.10(s) of [Mendelson] p. 231. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.) |
| ⊢ (V ∖ (V ∖ 𝐴)) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | ssconb 4092 | Contraposition law for subsets. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | sscon 4093 | Contraposition law for subsets. Exercise 15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ssdif 4094 | Difference law for subsets. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ssdifd 4095 | If 𝐴 is contained in 𝐵, then (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) is contained in (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶). Deduction form of ssdif 4094. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | sscond 4096 | If 𝐴 is contained in 𝐵, then (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵) is contained in (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴). Deduction form of sscon 4093. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ssdifssd 4097 | If 𝐴 is contained in 𝐵, then (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) is also contained in 𝐵. Deduction form of ssdifss 4090. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ssdif2d 4098 | If 𝐴 is contained in 𝐵 and 𝐶 is contained in 𝐷, then (𝐴 ∖ 𝐷) is contained in (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶). Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | raldifb 4099 | Restricted universal quantification on a class difference in terms of an implication. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | rexdifi 4100 | Restricted existential quantification over a difference. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)𝜑) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |