| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 41 of 505) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31179) |
(31180-32702) |
(32703-50434) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | nssne1 4001 | Two classes are different if they don't include the same class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | nssne2 4002 | Two classes are different if they are not subclasses of the same class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | nss 4003* | Negation of subclass relationship. Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | nssrex 4004* | Negation of subclass relationship. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Mar-2021.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | nelss 4005 | Demonstrate by witnesses that two classes lack a subclass relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | ssrexf 4006 | Restricted existential quantification follows from a subclass relationship. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ssrmof 4007 | "At most one" existential quantification restricted to a subclass. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ssralv 4008* | Quantification restricted to a subclass. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2006.) Avoid axioms. (Revised by GG, 19-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ssrexv 4009* | Existential quantification restricted to a subclass. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2007.) Avoid axioms. (Revised by GG, 19-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ss2ralv 4010* | Two quantifications restricted to a subclass. (Contributed by AV, 11-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ss2rexv 4011* | Two existential quantifications restricted to a subclass. (Contributed by AV, 11-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ralss 4012* | Restricted universal quantification on a subset in terms of superset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) Avoid axioms. (Revised by SN, 14-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | rexss 4013* | Restricted existential quantification on a subset in terms of superset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) Avoid axioms. (Revised by SN, 14-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | ralssOLD 4014* | Obsolete version of ralss 4012 as of 14-Oct-2025. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | rexssOLD 4015* | Obsolete version of rexss 4013 as of 14-Oct-2025. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | ss2abim 4016 | Class abstractions in a subclass relationship. Reverse direction of ss2ab 4017 which requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by SN, 22-Dec-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) | ||
| Theorem | ss2ab 4017 | Class abstractions in a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-1994.) |
| ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | abss 4018* | Class abstraction in a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2006.) |
| ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ssab 4019* | Subclass of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ssabral 4020* | The relation for a subclass of a class abstraction is equivalent to restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 6-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ss2abdv 4021* | Deduction of abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2011.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 28-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | ss2abi 4022 | Inference of abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1995.) Avoid ax-8 2147, ax-10 2178, ax-11 2194, ax-12 2215. (Revised by GG, 28-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} | ||
| Theorem | abssdv 4023* | Deduction of abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-2006.) (Proof shortened by SN, 22-Dec-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | abssi 4024* | Inference of abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | ss2rab 4025 | Restricted abstraction classes in a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | rabss 4026* | Restricted class abstraction in a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2006.) |
| ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ssrab 4027* | Subclass of a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ss2rabd 4028 | Subclass of a restricted class abstraction (deduction form). Saves ax-10 2178, ax-11 2194, ax-12 2215 over using ss2rab 4025 and sylibr 237. (Contributed by SN, 4-Feb-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | ssrabdv 4029* | Subclass of a restricted class abstraction (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) | ||
| Theorem | rabssdv 4030* | Subclass of a restricted class abstraction (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ss2rabdv 4031* | Deduction of restricted abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) Avoid axioms. (Revised by TM, 1-Feb-2026.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | ss2rabi 4032 | Inference of restricted abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.) Avoid axioms. (Revised by SN, 4-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} | ||
| Theorem | rabss2 4033* | Subclass law for restricted abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) Avoid axioms. (Revised by TM, 1-Feb-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | rabss2OLD 4034* | Obsolete version of rabss2 4033 as of 1-Feb-2026. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | ssab2 4035* | Subclass relation for the restriction of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1995.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | ssrab2 4036* | Subclass relation for a restricted class. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by BJ and SN, 8-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | rabss3d 4037* | Subclass law for restricted abstraction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓}) | ||
| Theorem | ssrab3 4038* | Subclass relation for a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | rabssrabd 4039* | Subclass of a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | ssrabeq 4040* | If the restricting class of a restricted class abstraction is a subset of this restricted class abstraction, it is equal to this restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑉 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | rabssab 4041 | A restricted class is a subclass of the corresponding unrestricted class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} | ||
| Theorem | eqrrabd 4042* | Deduce equality with a restricted abstraction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) | ||
| Theorem | uniiunlem 4043* | A subset relationship useful for converting union to indexed union using dfiun2 4992 or dfiun2g 4990 and intersection to indexed intersection using dfiin2 4993. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} ⊆ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | dfpss2 4044 | Alternate definition of proper subclass. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | dfpss3 4045 | Alternate definition of proper subclass. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | psseq1 4046 | Equality theorem for proper subclass. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | psseq2 4047 | Equality theorem for proper subclass. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ⊊ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ⊊ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | psseq1i 4048 | An equality inference for the proper subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | psseq2i 4049 | An equality inference for the proper subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ⊊ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ⊊ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | psseq12i 4050 | An equality inference for the proper subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | psseq1d 4051 | An equality deduction for the proper subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | psseq2d 4052 | An equality deduction for the proper subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ⊊ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ⊊ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | psseq12d 4053 | An equality deduction for the proper subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | pssss 4054 | A proper subclass is a subclass. Theorem 10 of [Suppes] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pssne 4055 | Two classes in a proper subclass relationship are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pssssd 4056 | Deduce subclass from proper subclass. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pssned 4057 | Proper subclasses are unequal. Deduction form of pssne 4055. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | sspss 4058 | Subclass in terms of proper subclass. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | pssirr 4059 | Proper subclass is irreflexive. Theorem 7 of [Suppes] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Umit Teoman Dogan, 10-Jun-2026.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | pssirrOLD 4060 | Obsolete version of pssirr 4059 as of 10-Jun-2026. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | pssn2lp 4061 | Proper subclass has no 2-cycle loops. Compare Theorem 8 of [Suppes] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ¬ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sspsstri 4062 | Two ways of stating trichotomy with respect to inclusion. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ssnpss 4063 | Partial trichotomy law for subclasses. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | psstr 4064 | Transitive law for proper subclass. Theorem 9 of [Suppes] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | sspsstr 4065 | Transitive law for subclass and proper subclass. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1996.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | psssstr 4066 | Transitive law for subclass and proper subclass. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1996.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | psstrd 4067 | Proper subclass inclusion is transitive. Deduction form of psstr 4064. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | sspsstrd 4068 | Transitivity involving subclass and proper subclass inclusion. Deduction form of sspsstr 4065. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | psssstrd 4069 | Transitivity involving subclass and proper subclass inclusion. Deduction form of psssstr 4066. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | npss 4070 | A class is not a proper subclass of another iff it satisfies a one-directional form of eqss 3954. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ssnelpss 4071 | A subclass missing a member is a proper subclass. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2002.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ssnelpssd 4072 | Subclass inclusion with one element of the superclass missing is proper subclass inclusion. Deduction form of ssnelpss 4071. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ssexnelpss 4073* | If there is an element of a class which is not contained in a subclass, the subclass is a proper subclass. (Contributed by AV, 29-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ∉ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dfdif3 4074* | Alternate definition of class difference. (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 16-Jun-2022.) (Proof shortened by SN, 15-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦} | ||
| Theorem | dfdif3OLD 4075* | Obsolete version of dfdif3 4074 as of 15-Aug-2025. (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 16-Jun-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦} | ||
| Theorem | difeq1 4076 | Equality theorem for class difference. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | difeq2 4077 | Equality theorem for class difference. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | difeq12 4078 | Equality theorem for class difference. (Contributed by FL, 31-Aug-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | difeq1i 4079 | Inference adding difference to the right in a class equality. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2002.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | difeq2i 4080 | Inference adding difference to the left in a class equality. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2002.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | difeq12i 4081 | Equality inference for class difference. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | difeq1d 4082 | Deduction adding difference to the right in a class equality. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2002.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | difeq2d 4083 | Deduction adding difference to the left in a class equality. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2002.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | difeq12d 4084 | Equality deduction for class difference. (Contributed by FL, 29-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | difeqri 4085* | Inference from membership to difference. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = 𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | nfdif 4086 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for class difference. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-10 2178, ax-11 2194, ax-12 2215. (Revised by SN, 14-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | eldifi 4087 | Implication of membership in a class difference. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | eldifn 4088 | Implication of membership in a class difference. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | elndif 4089 | A set does not belong to a class excluding it. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | neldif 4090 | Implication of membership in a class difference. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-1994.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | difdif 4091 | Double class difference. Exercise 11 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | difss 4092 | Subclass relationship for class difference. Exercise 14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | difssd 4093 | A difference of two classes is contained in the minuend. Deduction form of difss 4092. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | difss2 4094 | If a class is contained in a difference, it is contained in the minuend. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | difss2d 4095 | If a class is contained in a difference, it is contained in the minuend. Deduction form of difss2 4094. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ssdifss 4096 | Preservation of a subclass relationship by class difference. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ddif 4097 | Double complement under universal class. Exercise 4.10(s) of [Mendelson] p. 231. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.) |
| ⊢ (V ∖ (V ∖ 𝐴)) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | ssconb 4098 | Contraposition law for subsets. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | sscon 4099 | Contraposition law for subsets. Exercise 15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ssdif 4100 | Difference law for subsets. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |