Theorem ralprgf 4633

Description: Convert a restricted universal quantification over a pair to a conjunction, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ralprgf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
ralprgf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒
ralprgf.a	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
ralprgf.b	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ralprgf	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)   𝑊(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ralprgf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-pr 4565	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} = ({𝐴} ∪ {𝐵})
2	1	raleqi 3296	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ({𝐴} ∪ {𝐵})𝜑)
3		ralunb 4133	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ({𝐴} ∪ {𝐵})𝜑 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵}𝜑))
4	2, 3	bitri 276	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵}𝜑))
5		ralprgf.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
6		ralprgf.a	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
7	5, 6	ralsngf 4612	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
8		ralprgf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒
9		ralprgf.b	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
10	8, 9	ralsngf 4612	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵}𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
11	7, 10	bi2anan9 644	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵}𝜑) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
12	4, 11	bitrid 284	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 207   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1547  Ⅎwnf 1790   ∈ wcel 2119  ∀wral 3054   ∪ cun 3888  {csn 4562  {cpr 4564

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-12 2189  ax-ext 2712

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-3an 1094  df-tru 1550  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2074  df-clab 2719  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2815  df-ral 3055  df-rex 3065  df-v 3434  df-sbc 3731  df-un 3895  df-sn 4563  df-pr 4565

This theorem is referenced by: (None)