P. 47 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 4601-4700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Syntax	cpr 4601	Extend class notation to include unordered pair.
class {𝐴, 𝐵}
Definition	df-pr 4602	Define unordered pair of classes. Definition 7.1 of [Quine] p. 48. For example, 𝐴 ∈ {1, -1} → (𝐴↑2) = 1 (ex-pr 30345). They are unordered, so {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐵, 𝐴} as proven by prcom 4706. For a more traditional definition, but requiring a dummy variable, see dfpr2 4620. {𝐴, 𝐴} is also an unordered pair, but also a singleton because of {𝐴} = {𝐴, 𝐴} (see dfsn2 4612). Therefore, {𝐴, 𝐵} is called a proper (unordered) pair iff 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 and 𝐴 and 𝐵 are sets. Note: ordered pairs are a completely different object defined below in df-op 4606. When the term "pair" is used without qualifier, it generally means "unordered pair", and the context makes it clear which version is meant. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} = ({𝐴} ∪ {𝐵})
Syntax	ctp 4603	Extend class notation to include unordered triple (sometimes called "unordered triplet").
class {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}
Definition	df-tp 4604	Define unordered triple of classes. Definition of [Enderton] p. 19. Note: ordered triples are a completely different object defined below in df-ot 4608. As with all tuples, when the term "triple" is used without qualifier, it means "ordered triple". (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1994.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∪ {𝐶})
Syntax	cop 4605	Extend class notation to include ordered pair.
class ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩
Definition	df-op 4606*	Definition of an ordered pair, equivalent to Kuratowski's definition {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}} when the arguments are sets. Since the behavior of Kuratowski definition is not very useful for proper classes, we define it to be empty in this case (see opprc1 4871, opprc2 4872, and 0nelop 5469). For Kuratowski's actual definition when the arguments are sets, see dfop 4846. For the justifying theorem (for sets) see opth 5449. See dfopif 4844 for an equivalent formulation using the if operation. Definition 9.1 of [Quine] p. 58 defines an ordered pair unconditionally as ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}}, which has different behavior from our df-op 4606 when the arguments are proper classes. Ordinarily this difference is not important, since neither definition is meaningful in that case. Our df-op 4606 was chosen because it often makes proofs shorter by eliminating unnecessary sethood hypotheses. There are other ways to define ordered pairs. The basic requirement is that two ordered pairs are equal iff their respective members are equal. In 1914 Norbert Wiener gave the first successful definition ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩2 = {{{𝐴}, ∅}, {{𝐵}}}, justified by opthwiener 5487. This was simplified by Kazimierz Kuratowski in 1921 to our present definition. An even simpler definition ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩3 = {𝐴, {𝐴, 𝐵}} is justified by opthreg 9625, but it requires the Axiom of Regularity for its justification and is not commonly used. A definition that also works for proper classes is ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩4 = ((𝐴 × {∅}) ∪ (𝐵 × {{∅}})), justified by opthprc 5716. Nearly at the same time as Norbert Wiener, Felix Hausdorff proposed the following definition in "Grundzüge der Mengenlehre" ("Basics of Set Theory"), p. 32, in 1914: ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩5 = {{𝐴, 𝑂}, {𝐵, 𝑇}}. Hausdorff used 1 and 2 instead of 𝑂 and 𝑇, but actually any two different fixed sets will do (e.g., 𝑂 = ∅ and 𝑇 = {∅}, see 0nep0 5326). Furthermore, Hausdorff demanded that 𝑂 and 𝑇 are both different from 𝐴 as well as 𝐵, which is actually not necessary (at least not in full extent), see opthhausdorff0 5491 and opthhausdorff 5490. If we restrict our sets to nonnegative integers, an ordered pair definition that involves only elementary arithmetic is provided by nn0opthi 14278. An ordered pair of real numbers can also be represented by a complex number as shown by cru 12225. Kuratowski's ordered pair definition is standard for ZFC set theory, but it is very inconvenient to use in New Foundations theory because it is not type-level; a common alternate definition in New Foundations is the definition from [Rosser] p. 281. Since there are other ways to define ordered pairs, we discourage direct use of this definition so that most theorems won't depend on this particular construction; theorems will instead rely on dfopif 4844. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = {𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}})}
Syntax	cotp 4607	Extend class notation to include ordered triple.
class ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩
Definition	df-ot 4608	Define ordered triple of classes. Definition of ordered triple in [Stoll] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ = ⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩
Theorem	sneq 4609	Equality theorem for singletons. Part of Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐴} = {𝐵})
Theorem	sneqi 4610	Equality inference for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ {𝐴} = {𝐵}
Theorem	sneqd 4611	Equality deduction for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴} = {𝐵})
Theorem	dfsn2 4612	Alternate definition of singleton. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.)
⊢ {𝐴} = {𝐴, 𝐴}
Theorem	elsng 4613	There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15 (generalized). (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	elsn 4614	There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	velsn 4615	There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	elsni 4616	There is at most one element in a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	elsnd 4617	There is at most one element in a singleton. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	rabsneq 4618*	Equality of class abstractions restricted to a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 17-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∈ {𝑁} ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝑥 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝜓)})
Theorem	absn 4619*	Condition for a class abstraction to be a singleton. Formerly part of proof of dfiota2 6482. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.) (Revised by AV, 24-Aug-2022.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑌} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑌))
Theorem	dfpr2 4620*	Alternate definition of a pair. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵)}
Theorem	dfsn2ALT 4621	Alternate definition of singleton, based on the (alternate) definition of pair. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by AV, 12-Jun-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ {𝐴} = {𝐴, 𝐴}
Theorem	elprg 4622	A member of a pair of classes is one or the other of them, and conversely as soon as it is a set. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15, generalized. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))
Theorem	elpri 4623	If a class is an element of a pair, then it is one of the two paired elements. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Apr-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
Theorem	elpr 4624	A member of a pair of classes is one or the other of them, and conversely as soon as it is a set. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
Theorem	elpr2g 4625	A member of a pair of sets is one or the other of them, and conversely. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) Generalize from sethood hypothesis to sethood antecedent. (Revised by BJ, 25-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))
Theorem	elpr2 4626	A member of a pair of sets is one or the other of them, and conversely. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 23-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
Theorem	nelpr2 4627	If a class is not an element of an unordered pair, it is not the second listed element. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	nelpr1 4628	If a class is not an element of an unordered pair, it is not the first listed element. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	nelpri 4629	If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶}
Theorem	prneli 4630	If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair, using ∉. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∉ {𝐵, 𝐶}
Theorem	nelprd 4631	If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶})
Theorem	eldifpr 4632	Membership in a set with two elements removed. Similar to eldifsn 4760 and eldiftp 4661. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ {𝐶, 𝐷}) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷))
Theorem	rexdifpr 4633	Restricted existential quantification over a set with two elements removed. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Feb-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 15-May-2025.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵, 𝐶})𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	snidg 4634	A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴})
Theorem	snidb 4635	A class is a set iff it is a member of its singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴})
Theorem	snid 4636	A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}
Theorem	vsnid 4637	A setvar variable is a member of its singleton. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥}
Theorem	elsn2g 4638	There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that 𝐵, rather than 𝐴, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	elsn2 4639	There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that 𝐵, rather than 𝐴, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	nelsn 4640	If a class is not equal to the class in a singleton, then it is not in the singleton. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 4-May-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵})
Theorem	rabeqsn 4641*	Conditions for a restricted class abstraction to be a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 26-Aug-2022.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑋} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑋))
Theorem	rabsssn 4642*	Conditions for a restricted class abstraction to be a subset of a singleton, i.e. to be a singleton or the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑋} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑋))
Theorem	rabeqsnd 4643*	Conditions for a restricted class abstraction to be a singleton, in deduction form. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑥 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝐵})
Theorem	ralsnsg 4644*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	rexsns 4645*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) (Revised by NM, 22-Aug-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	rexsngf 4646*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.) (Revised by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ralsngf 4647*	Restricted universal quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by AV, 3-Apr-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	reusngf 4648*	Restricted existential uniqueness over a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ralsng 4649*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-10 2140, ax-12 2176. (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	rexsng 4650*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.) Avoid ax-10 2140, ax-12 2176. (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	reusng 4651*	Restricted existential uniqueness over a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	2ralsng 4652*	Substitution expressed in terms of two quantifications over singletons. (Contributed by AV, 22-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}∀𝑦 ∈ {𝐵}𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	rexreusng 4653*	Restricted existential uniqueness over a singleton is equivalent to a restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑))
Theorem	exsnrex 4654	There is a set being the element of a singleton if and only if there is an element of the singleton. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑀 = {𝑥} ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 𝑀 = {𝑥})
Theorem	ralsn 4655*	Convert a universal quantification restricted to a singleton to a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2009.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	rexsn 4656*	Convert an existential quantification restricted to a singleton to a substitution. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	elunsn 4657	Elementhood in a union with a singleton. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐶}) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))
Theorem	elpwunsn 4658	Membership in an extension of a power class. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 (𝐵 ∪ {𝐶}) ∖ 𝒫 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	eqoreldif 4659	An element of a set is either equal to another element of the set or a member of the difference of the set and the singleton containing the other element. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 23-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐵}))))
Theorem	eltpg 4660	Members of an unordered triple of classes. (Contributed by FL, 2-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐷)))
Theorem	eldiftp 4661	Membership in a set with three elements removed. Similar to eldifsn 4760 and eldifpr 4632. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐸}) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐸)))
Theorem	eltpi 4662	A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐷))
Theorem	eltp 4663	A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. Special case of Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐷))
Theorem	el7g 4664	Members of a set with seven elements. Lemma for usgrexmpl2nb0 47943 etc. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ ({𝐴} ∪ ({𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} ∪ {𝐸, 𝐹, 𝐺})) ↔ (𝑋 = 𝐴 ∨ ((𝑋 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝑋 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝑋 = 𝐷) ∨ (𝑋 = 𝐸 ∨ 𝑋 = 𝐹 ∨ 𝑋 = 𝐺)))))
Theorem	dftp2 4665*	Alternate definition of unordered triple of classes. Special case of Definition 5.3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐶)}
Theorem	nfpr 4666	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝐴, 𝐵}
Theorem	ifpr 4667	Membership of a conditional operator in an unordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵})
Theorem	ralprgf 4668*	Convert a restricted universal quantification over a pair to a conjunction, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	rexprgf 4669*	Convert a restricted existential quantification over a pair to a disjunction, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by AV, 2-Apr-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	ralprg 4670*	Convert a restricted universal quantification over a pair to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-10 2140, ax-12 2176. (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	rexprg 4671*	Convert a restricted existential quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-10 2140, ax-12 2176. (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	raltpg 4672*	Convert a restricted universal quantification over a triple to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	rextpg 4673*	Convert a restricted existential quantification over a triple to a disjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)))
Theorem	ralpr 4674*	Convert a restricted universal quantification over a pair to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	rexpr 4675*	Convert a restricted existential quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
Theorem	reuprg0 4676*	Convert a restricted existential uniqueness over a pair to a disjunction of conjunctions. (Contributed by AV, 2-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)) ∨ (𝜒 ∧ (𝜓 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))))
Theorem	reuprg 4677*	Convert a restricted existential uniqueness over a pair to a disjunction and an implication . (Contributed by AV, 2-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))))
Theorem	reurexprg 4678*	Convert a restricted existential uniqueness over a pair to a restricted existential quantification and an implication . (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ∧ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))))
Theorem	raltp 4679*	Convert a universal quantification over an unordered triple to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))
Theorem	rextp 4680*	Convert an existential quantification over an unordered triple to a disjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))
Theorem	nfsn 4681	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝐴}
Theorem	csbsng 4682	Distribute proper substitution through the singleton of a class. csbsng 4682 is derived from the virtual deduction proof csbsngVD 44851. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵})
Theorem	csbprg 4683	Distribute proper substitution through a pair of classes. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐶 / 𝑥⦌{𝐴, 𝐵} = {⦋𝐶 / 𝑥⦌𝐴, ⦋𝐶 / 𝑥⦌𝐵})
Theorem	elinsn 4684	If the intersection of two classes is a (proper) singleton, then the singleton element is a member of both classes. (Contributed by AV, 30-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) = {𝐴}) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	disjsn 4685	Intersection with the singleton of a non-member is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ {𝐵}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	disjsn2 4686	Two distinct singletons are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ({𝐴} ∩ {𝐵}) = ∅)
Theorem	disjpr2 4687	Two completely distinct unordered pairs are disjoint. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Nov-2017.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 23-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷)) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∩ {𝐶, 𝐷}) = ∅)
Theorem	disjprsn 4688	The disjoint intersection of an unordered pair and a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∩ {𝐶}) = ∅)
Theorem	disjtpsn 4689	The disjoint intersection of an unordered triple and a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 14-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷) → ({𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∩ {𝐷}) = ∅)
Theorem	disjtp2 4690	Two completely distinct unordered triples are disjoint. (Contributed by AV, 14-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐸) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐹)) → ({𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∩ {𝐷, 𝐸, 𝐹}) = ∅)
Theorem	snprc 4691	The singleton of a proper class (one that doesn't exist) is the empty set. Theorem 7.2 of [Quine] p. 48. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V ↔ {𝐴} = ∅)
Theorem	snnzb 4692	A singleton is nonempty iff its argument is a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-May-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ {𝐴} ≠ ∅)
Theorem	rmosn 4693*	A restricted at-most-one quantifier over a singleton is always true. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ∃*𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑
Theorem	r19.12sn 4694*	Special case of r19.12 3292 where its converse holds. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) (Revised by BJ, 18-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑))
Theorem	rabsn 4695*	Condition where a restricted class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by AV, 26-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐵} = {𝐵})
Theorem	rabsnifsb 4696*	A restricted class abstraction restricted to a singleton is either the empty set or the singleton itself. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jul-2019.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ∣ 𝜑} = if([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑, {𝐴}, ∅)
Theorem	rabsnif 4697*	A restricted class abstraction restricted to a singleton is either the empty set or the singleton itself. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 21-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ∣ 𝜑} = if(𝜓, {𝐴}, ∅)
Theorem	rabrsn 4698*	A restricted class abstraction restricted to a singleton is either the empty set or the singleton itself. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Dec-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 21-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑀 = {𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑀 = ∅ ∨ 𝑀 = {𝐴}))
Theorem	euabsn2 4699*	Another way to express existential uniqueness of a wff: its class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦})
Theorem	euabsn 4700	Another way to express existential uniqueness of a wff: its class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥})