| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 47 of 499) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30888) |
(30889-32411) |
(32412-49816) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | elpr2 4601 | A member of a pair of sets is one or the other of them, and conversely. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 23-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | elprn1 4602 | A member of an unordered pair that is not the "first", must be the "second". (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | elprn2 4603 | A member of an unordered pair that is not the "second", must be the "first". (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | nelpr2 4604 | If a class is not an element of an unordered pair, it is not the second listed element. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Mar-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | nelpr1 4605 | If a class is not an element of an unordered pair, it is not the first listed element. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Mar-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | nelpri 4606 | If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} | ||
| Theorem | prneli 4607 | If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair, using ∉. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∉ {𝐵, 𝐶} | ||
| Theorem | nelprd 4608 | If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶}) | ||
| Theorem | eldifpr 4609 | Membership in a set with two elements removed. Similar to eldifsn 4736 and eldiftp 4638. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ {𝐶, 𝐷}) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | rexdifpr 4610 | Restricted existential quantification over a set with two elements removed. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Feb-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 15-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵, 𝐶})𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | snidg 4611 | A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}) | ||
| Theorem | snidb 4612 | A class is a set iff it is a member of its singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}) | ||
| Theorem | snid 4613 | A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴} | ||
| Theorem | vsnid 4614 | A setvar variable is a member of its singleton. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥} | ||
| Theorem | elsn2g 4615 | There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that 𝐵, rather than 𝐴, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elsn2 4616 | There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that 𝐵, rather than 𝐴, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-1994.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | nelsn 4617 | If a class is not equal to the class in a singleton, then it is not in the singleton. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 4-May-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | rabeqsn 4618* | Conditions for a restricted class abstraction to be a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 26-Aug-2022.) |
| ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑋} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | rabsssn 4619* | Conditions for a restricted class abstraction to be a subset of a singleton, i.e. to be a singleton or the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑋} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | rabeqsnd 4620* | Conditions for a restricted class abstraction to be a singleton, in deduction form. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Dec-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑥 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | ralsnsg 4621* | Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | rexsns 4622* | Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) (Revised by NM, 22-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | rexsngf 4623* | Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.) (Revised by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | ralsngf 4624* | Restricted universal quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by AV, 3-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | reusngf 4625* | Restricted existential uniqueness over a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | ralsng 4626* | Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-10 2143, ax-12 2179. (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | rexsng 4627* | Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.) Avoid ax-10 2143, ax-12 2179. (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | reusng 4628* | Restricted existential uniqueness over a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 2ralsng 4629* | Substitution expressed in terms of two quantifications over singletons. (Contributed by AV, 22-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}∀𝑦 ∈ {𝐵}𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | rexreusng 4630* | Restricted existential uniqueness over a singleton is equivalent to a restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | exsnrex 4631 | There is a set being the element of a singleton if and only if there is an element of the singleton. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑀 = {𝑥} ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 𝑀 = {𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | ralsn 4632* | Convert a universal quantification restricted to a singleton to a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2009.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | rexsn 4633* | Convert an existential quantification restricted to a singleton to a substitution. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | elunsn 4634 | Elementhood in a union with a singleton. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐶}) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | elpwunsn 4635 | Membership in an extension of a power class. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 (𝐵 ∪ {𝐶}) ∖ 𝒫 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | eqoreldif 4636 | An element of a set is either equal to another element of the set or a member of the difference of the set and the singleton containing the other element. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 23-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐵})))) | ||
| Theorem | eltpg 4637 | Members of an unordered triple of classes. (Contributed by FL, 2-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | eldiftp 4638 | Membership in a set with three elements removed. Similar to eldifsn 4736 and eldifpr 4609. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 22-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐸}) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐸))) | ||
| Theorem | eltpi 4639 | A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | eltp 4640 | A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. Special case of Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | el7g 4641 | Members of a set with seven elements. Lemma for usgrexmpl2nb0 48041 etc. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ ({𝐴} ∪ ({𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} ∪ {𝐸, 𝐹, 𝐺})) ↔ (𝑋 = 𝐴 ∨ ((𝑋 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝑋 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝑋 = 𝐷) ∨ (𝑋 = 𝐸 ∨ 𝑋 = 𝐹 ∨ 𝑋 = 𝐺))))) | ||
| Theorem | dftp2 4642* | Alternate definition of unordered triple of classes. Special case of Definition 5.3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.) |
| ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐶)} | ||
| Theorem | nfpr 4643 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝐴, 𝐵} | ||
| Theorem | ifpr 4644 | Membership of a conditional operator in an unordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | ralprgf 4645* | Convert a restricted universal quantification over a pair to a conjunction, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | rexprgf 4646* | Convert a restricted existential quantification over a pair to a disjunction, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by AV, 2-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | ralprg 4647* | Convert a restricted universal quantification over a pair to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-10 2143, ax-12 2179. (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | rexprg 4648* | Convert a restricted existential quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-10 2143, ax-12 2179. (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | raltpg 4649* | Convert a restricted universal quantification over a triple to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) | ||
| Theorem | rextpg 4650* | Convert a restricted existential quantification over a triple to a disjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))) | ||
| Theorem | ralpr 4651* | Convert a restricted universal quantification over a pair to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | rexpr 4652* | Convert a restricted existential quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | reuprg0 4653* | Convert a restricted existential uniqueness over a pair to a disjunction of conjunctions. (Contributed by AV, 2-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)) ∨ (𝜒 ∧ (𝜓 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))))) | ||
| Theorem | reuprg 4654* | Convert a restricted existential uniqueness over a pair to a disjunction and an implication . (Contributed by AV, 2-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | reurexprg 4655* | Convert a restricted existential uniqueness over a pair to a restricted existential quantification and an implication . (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ∧ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | raltp 4656* | Convert a universal quantification over an unordered triple to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | rextp 4657* | Convert an existential quantification over an unordered triple to a disjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | nfsn 4658 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝐴} | ||
| Theorem | csbsng 4659 | Distribute proper substitution through the singleton of a class. csbsng 4659 is derived from the virtual deduction proof csbsngVD 44904. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | csbprg 4660 | Distribute proper substitution through a pair of classes. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐶 / 𝑥⦌{𝐴, 𝐵} = {⦋𝐶 / 𝑥⦌𝐴, ⦋𝐶 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | elinsn 4661 | If the intersection of two classes is a (proper) singleton, then the singleton element is a member of both classes. (Contributed by AV, 30-Dec-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) = {𝐴}) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | disjsn 4662 | Intersection with the singleton of a non-member is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ {𝐵}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | disjsn2 4663 | Two distinct singletons are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ({𝐴} ∩ {𝐵}) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | disjpr2 4664 | Two completely distinct unordered pairs are disjoint. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Nov-2017.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 23-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷)) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∩ {𝐶, 𝐷}) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | disjprsn 4665 | The disjoint intersection of an unordered pair and a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jan-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∩ {𝐶}) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | disjtpsn 4666 | The disjoint intersection of an unordered triple and a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 14-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷) → ({𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∩ {𝐷}) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | disjtp2 4667 | Two completely distinct unordered triples are disjoint. (Contributed by AV, 14-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐸) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐹)) → ({𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∩ {𝐷, 𝐸, 𝐹}) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | snprc 4668 | The singleton of a proper class (one that doesn't exist) is the empty set. Theorem 7.2 of [Quine] p. 48. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V ↔ {𝐴} = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | snnzb 4669 | A singleton is nonempty iff its argument is a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ {𝐴} ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | rmosn 4670* | A restricted at-most-one quantifier over a singleton is always true. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ ∃*𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | r19.12sn 4671* | Special case of r19.12 3279 where its converse holds. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) (Revised by BJ, 18-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | rabsn 4672* | Condition where a restricted class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by AV, 26-Aug-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐵} = {𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | rabsnifsb 4673* | A restricted class abstraction restricted to a singleton is either the empty set or the singleton itself. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ∣ 𝜑} = if([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑, {𝐴}, ∅) | ||
| Theorem | rabsnif 4674* | A restricted class abstraction restricted to a singleton is either the empty set or the singleton itself. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 21-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ∣ 𝜑} = if(𝜓, {𝐴}, ∅) | ||
| Theorem | rabrsn 4675* | A restricted class abstraction restricted to a singleton is either the empty set or the singleton itself. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Dec-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 21-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 = {𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑀 = ∅ ∨ 𝑀 = {𝐴})) | ||
| Theorem | euabsn2 4676* | Another way to express existential uniqueness of a wff: its class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | euabsn 4677 | Another way to express existential uniqueness of a wff: its class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | reusn 4678* | A way to express restricted existential uniqueness of a wff: its restricted class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦{𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | absneu 4679 | Restricted existential uniqueness determined by a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝐴}) → ∃!𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | rabsneu 4680 | Restricted existential uniqueness determined by a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝐴}) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | eusn 4681* | Two ways to express "𝐴 is a singleton". (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2010.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝐴 = {𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | rabsnt 4682* | Truth implied by equality of a restricted class abstraction and a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝐵} → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | prcom 4683 | Commutative law for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-1993.) |
| ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐵, 𝐴} | ||
| Theorem | preq1 4684 | Equality theorem for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐶}) | ||
| Theorem | preq2 4685 | Equality theorem for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐶, 𝐴} = {𝐶, 𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | preq12 4686 | Equality theorem for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) → {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷}) | ||
| Theorem | preq1i 4687 | Equality inference for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐶} | ||
| Theorem | preq2i 4688 | Equality inference for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ {𝐶, 𝐴} = {𝐶, 𝐵} | ||
| Theorem | preq12i 4689 | Equality inference for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐷} | ||
| Theorem | preq1d 4690 | Equality deduction for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐶}) | ||
| Theorem | preq2d 4691 | Equality deduction for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐶, 𝐴} = {𝐶, 𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | preq12d 4692 | Equality deduction for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐷}) | ||
| Theorem | tpeq1 4693 | Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐷} = {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷}) | ||
| Theorem | tpeq2 4694 | Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐶, 𝐴, 𝐷} = {𝐶, 𝐵, 𝐷}) | ||
| Theorem | tpeq3 4695 | Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐴} = {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | tpeq1d 4696 | Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐷} = {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷}) | ||
| Theorem | tpeq2d 4697 | Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐶, 𝐴, 𝐷} = {𝐶, 𝐵, 𝐷}) | ||
| Theorem | tpeq3d 4698 | Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐴} = {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | tpeq123d 4699 | Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐸} = {𝐵, 𝐷, 𝐹}) | ||
| Theorem | tprot 4700 | Rotation of the elements of an unordered triple. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐴} | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |