P. 47 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 4601-4700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Syntax	csn 4601	Extend class notation to include singleton.
class {𝐴}
Definition	df-sn 4602*	Define the singleton of a class. Definition 7.1 of [Quine] p. 48. For convenience, it is well-defined for proper classes, i.e., those that are not elements of V, see snprc 4693. For an alternate definition see dfsn2 4614. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ {𝐴} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐴}
Syntax	cpr 4603	Extend class notation to include unordered pair.
class {𝐴, 𝐵}
Definition	df-pr 4604	Define unordered pair of classes. Definition 7.1 of [Quine] p. 48. For example, 𝐴 ∈ {1, -1} → (𝐴↑2) = 1 (ex-pr 30357). They are unordered, so {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐵, 𝐴} as proven by prcom 4708. For a more traditional definition, but requiring a dummy variable, see dfpr2 4622. {𝐴, 𝐴} is also an unordered pair, but also a singleton because of {𝐴} = {𝐴, 𝐴} (see dfsn2 4614). Therefore, {𝐴, 𝐵} is called a proper (unordered) pair iff 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 and 𝐴 and 𝐵 are sets. Note: ordered pairs are a completely different object defined below in df-op 4608. When the term "pair" is used without qualifier, it generally means "unordered pair", and the context makes it clear which version is meant. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} = ({𝐴} ∪ {𝐵})
Syntax	ctp 4605	Extend class notation to include unordered triple (sometimes called "unordered triplet").
class {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}
Definition	df-tp 4606	Define unordered triple of classes. Definition of [Enderton] p. 19. Note: ordered triples are a completely different object defined below in df-ot 4610. As with all tuples, when the term "triple" is used without qualifier, it means "ordered triple". (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1994.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∪ {𝐶})
Syntax	cop 4607	Extend class notation to include ordered pair.
class ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩
Definition	df-op 4608*	Definition of an ordered pair, equivalent to Kuratowski's definition {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}} when the arguments are sets. Since the behavior of Kuratowski definition is not very useful for proper classes, we define it to be empty in this case (see opprc1 4873, opprc2 4874, and 0nelop 5471). For Kuratowski's actual definition when the arguments are sets, see dfop 4848. For the justifying theorem (for sets) see opth 5451. See dfopif 4846 for an equivalent formulation using the if operation. Definition 9.1 of [Quine] p. 58 defines an ordered pair unconditionally as ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}}, which has different behavior from our df-op 4608 when the arguments are proper classes. Ordinarily this difference is not important, since neither definition is meaningful in that case. Our df-op 4608 was chosen because it often makes proofs shorter by eliminating unnecessary sethood hypotheses. There are other ways to define ordered pairs. The basic requirement is that two ordered pairs are equal iff their respective members are equal. In 1914 Norbert Wiener gave the first successful definition ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩2 = {{{𝐴}, ∅}, {{𝐵}}}, justified by opthwiener 5489. This was simplified by Kazimierz Kuratowski in 1921 to our present definition. An even simpler definition ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩3 = {𝐴, {𝐴, 𝐵}} is justified by opthreg 9630, but it requires the Axiom of Regularity for its justification and is not commonly used. A definition that also works for proper classes is ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩4 = ((𝐴 × {∅}) ∪ (𝐵 × {{∅}})), justified by opthprc 5718. Nearly at the same time as Norbert Wiener, Felix Hausdorff proposed the following definition in "Grundzüge der Mengenlehre" ("Basics of Set Theory"), p. 32, in 1914: ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩5 = {{𝐴, 𝑂}, {𝐵, 𝑇}}. Hausdorff used 1 and 2 instead of 𝑂 and 𝑇, but actually any two different fixed sets will do (e.g., 𝑂 = ∅ and 𝑇 = {∅}, see 0nep0 5328). Furthermore, Hausdorff demanded that 𝑂 and 𝑇 are both different from 𝐴 as well as 𝐵, which is actually not necessary (at least not in full extent), see opthhausdorff0 5493 and opthhausdorff 5492. If we restrict our sets to nonnegative integers, an ordered pair definition that involves only elementary arithmetic is provided by nn0opthi 14286. An ordered pair of real numbers can also be represented by a complex number as shown by cru 12230. Kuratowski's ordered pair definition is standard for ZFC set theory, but it is very inconvenient to use in New Foundations theory because it is not type-level; a common alternate definition in New Foundations is the definition from [Rosser] p. 281. Since there are other ways to define ordered pairs, we discourage direct use of this definition so that most theorems won't depend on this particular construction; theorems will instead rely on dfopif 4846. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = {𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}})}
Syntax	cotp 4609	Extend class notation to include ordered triple.
class ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩
Definition	df-ot 4610	Define ordered triple of classes. Definition of ordered triple in [Stoll] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ = ⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩
Theorem	sneq 4611	Equality theorem for singletons. Part of Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐴} = {𝐵})
Theorem	sneqi 4612	Equality inference for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ {𝐴} = {𝐵}
Theorem	sneqd 4613	Equality deduction for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴} = {𝐵})
Theorem	dfsn2 4614	Alternate definition of singleton. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.)
⊢ {𝐴} = {𝐴, 𝐴}
Theorem	elsng 4615	There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15 (generalized). (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	elsn 4616	There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	velsn 4617	There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	elsni 4618	There is at most one element in a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	elsnd 4619	There is at most one element in a singleton. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	rabsneq 4620*	Equality of class abstractions restricted to a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 17-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∈ {𝑁} ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝑥 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝜓)})
Theorem	absn 4621*	Condition for a class abstraction to be a singleton. Formerly part of proof of dfiota2 6484. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.) (Revised by AV, 24-Aug-2022.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑌} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑌))
Theorem	dfpr2 4622*	Alternate definition of a pair. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵)}
Theorem	dfsn2ALT 4623	Alternate definition of singleton, based on the (alternate) definition of pair. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by AV, 12-Jun-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ {𝐴} = {𝐴, 𝐴}
Theorem	elprg 4624	A member of a pair of classes is one or the other of them, and conversely as soon as it is a set. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15, generalized. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))
Theorem	elpri 4625	If a class is an element of a pair, then it is one of the two paired elements. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Apr-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
Theorem	elpr 4626	A member of a pair of classes is one or the other of them, and conversely as soon as it is a set. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
Theorem	elpr2g 4627	A member of a pair of sets is one or the other of them, and conversely. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) Generalize from sethood hypothesis to sethood antecedent. (Revised by BJ, 25-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))
Theorem	elpr2 4628	A member of a pair of sets is one or the other of them, and conversely. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 23-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
Theorem	nelpr2 4629	If a class is not an element of an unordered pair, it is not the second listed element. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	nelpr1 4630	If a class is not an element of an unordered pair, it is not the first listed element. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	nelpri 4631	If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶}
Theorem	prneli 4632	If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair, using ∉. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∉ {𝐵, 𝐶}
Theorem	nelprd 4633	If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶})
Theorem	eldifpr 4634	Membership in a set with two elements removed. Similar to eldifsn 4762 and eldiftp 4663. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ {𝐶, 𝐷}) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷))
Theorem	rexdifpr 4635	Restricted existential quantification over a set with two elements removed. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Feb-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 15-May-2025.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵, 𝐶})𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	snidg 4636	A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴})
Theorem	snidb 4637	A class is a set iff it is a member of its singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴})
Theorem	snid 4638	A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}
Theorem	vsnid 4639	A setvar variable is a member of its singleton. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥}
Theorem	elsn2g 4640	There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that 𝐵, rather than 𝐴, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	elsn2 4641	There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that 𝐵, rather than 𝐴, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	nelsn 4642	If a class is not equal to the class in a singleton, then it is not in the singleton. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 4-May-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵})
Theorem	rabeqsn 4643*	Conditions for a restricted class abstraction to be a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 26-Aug-2022.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑋} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑋))
Theorem	rabsssn 4644*	Conditions for a restricted class abstraction to be a subset of a singleton, i.e. to be a singleton or the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑋} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑋))
Theorem	rabeqsnd 4645*	Conditions for a restricted class abstraction to be a singleton, in deduction form. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑥 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝐵})
Theorem	ralsnsg 4646*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	rexsns 4647*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) (Revised by NM, 22-Aug-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	rexsngf 4648*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.) (Revised by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ralsngf 4649*	Restricted universal quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by AV, 3-Apr-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	reusngf 4650*	Restricted existential uniqueness over a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ralsng 4651*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-10 2141, ax-12 2177. (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	rexsng 4652*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.) Avoid ax-10 2141, ax-12 2177. (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	reusng 4653*	Restricted existential uniqueness over a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	2ralsng 4654*	Substitution expressed in terms of two quantifications over singletons. (Contributed by AV, 22-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}∀𝑦 ∈ {𝐵}𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	rexreusng 4655*	Restricted existential uniqueness over a singleton is equivalent to a restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑))
Theorem	exsnrex 4656	There is a set being the element of a singleton if and only if there is an element of the singleton. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑀 = {𝑥} ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 𝑀 = {𝑥})
Theorem	ralsn 4657*	Convert a universal quantification restricted to a singleton to a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2009.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	rexsn 4658*	Convert an existential quantification restricted to a singleton to a substitution. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	elunsn 4659	Elementhood in a union with a singleton. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐶}) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))
Theorem	elpwunsn 4660	Membership in an extension of a power class. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 (𝐵 ∪ {𝐶}) ∖ 𝒫 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	eqoreldif 4661	An element of a set is either equal to another element of the set or a member of the difference of the set and the singleton containing the other element. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 23-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐵}))))
Theorem	eltpg 4662	Members of an unordered triple of classes. (Contributed by FL, 2-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐷)))
Theorem	eldiftp 4663	Membership in a set with three elements removed. Similar to eldifsn 4762 and eldifpr 4634. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐸}) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐸)))
Theorem	eltpi 4664	A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐷))
Theorem	eltp 4665	A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. Special case of Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐷))
Theorem	el7g 4666	Members of a set with seven elements. Lemma for usgrexmpl2nb0 47983 etc. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ ({𝐴} ∪ ({𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} ∪ {𝐸, 𝐹, 𝐺})) ↔ (𝑋 = 𝐴 ∨ ((𝑋 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝑋 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝑋 = 𝐷) ∨ (𝑋 = 𝐸 ∨ 𝑋 = 𝐹 ∨ 𝑋 = 𝐺)))))
Theorem	dftp2 4667*	Alternate definition of unordered triple of classes. Special case of Definition 5.3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐶)}
Theorem	nfpr 4668	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝐴, 𝐵}
Theorem	ifpr 4669	Membership of a conditional operator in an unordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵})
Theorem	ralprgf 4670*	Convert a restricted universal quantification over a pair to a conjunction, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	rexprgf 4671*	Convert a restricted existential quantification over a pair to a disjunction, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by AV, 2-Apr-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	ralprg 4672*	Convert a restricted universal quantification over a pair to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-10 2141, ax-12 2177. (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	rexprg 4673*	Convert a restricted existential quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-10 2141, ax-12 2177. (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	raltpg 4674*	Convert a restricted universal quantification over a triple to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	rextpg 4675*	Convert a restricted existential quantification over a triple to a disjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)))
Theorem	ralpr 4676*	Convert a restricted universal quantification over a pair to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	rexpr 4677*	Convert a restricted existential quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
Theorem	reuprg0 4678*	Convert a restricted existential uniqueness over a pair to a disjunction of conjunctions. (Contributed by AV, 2-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)) ∨ (𝜒 ∧ (𝜓 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))))
Theorem	reuprg 4679*	Convert a restricted existential uniqueness over a pair to a disjunction and an implication . (Contributed by AV, 2-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))))
Theorem	reurexprg 4680*	Convert a restricted existential uniqueness over a pair to a restricted existential quantification and an implication . (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ∧ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))))
Theorem	raltp 4681*	Convert a universal quantification over an unordered triple to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))
Theorem	rextp 4682*	Convert an existential quantification over an unordered triple to a disjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))
Theorem	nfsn 4683	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝐴}
Theorem	csbsng 4684	Distribute proper substitution through the singleton of a class. csbsng 4684 is derived from the virtual deduction proof csbsngVD 44865. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵})
Theorem	csbprg 4685	Distribute proper substitution through a pair of classes. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐶 / 𝑥⦌{𝐴, 𝐵} = {⦋𝐶 / 𝑥⦌𝐴, ⦋𝐶 / 𝑥⦌𝐵})
Theorem	elinsn 4686	If the intersection of two classes is a (proper) singleton, then the singleton element is a member of both classes. (Contributed by AV, 30-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) = {𝐴}) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	disjsn 4687	Intersection with the singleton of a non-member is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ {𝐵}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	disjsn2 4688	Two distinct singletons are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ({𝐴} ∩ {𝐵}) = ∅)
Theorem	disjpr2 4689	Two completely distinct unordered pairs are disjoint. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Nov-2017.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 23-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷)) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∩ {𝐶, 𝐷}) = ∅)
Theorem	disjprsn 4690	The disjoint intersection of an unordered pair and a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∩ {𝐶}) = ∅)
Theorem	disjtpsn 4691	The disjoint intersection of an unordered triple and a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 14-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷) → ({𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∩ {𝐷}) = ∅)
Theorem	disjtp2 4692	Two completely distinct unordered triples are disjoint. (Contributed by AV, 14-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐸) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐹)) → ({𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∩ {𝐷, 𝐸, 𝐹}) = ∅)
Theorem	snprc 4693	The singleton of a proper class (one that doesn't exist) is the empty set. Theorem 7.2 of [Quine] p. 48. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V ↔ {𝐴} = ∅)
Theorem	snnzb 4694	A singleton is nonempty iff its argument is a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-May-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ {𝐴} ≠ ∅)
Theorem	rmosn 4695*	A restricted at-most-one quantifier over a singleton is always true. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ∃*𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑
Theorem	r19.12sn 4696*	Special case of r19.12 3294 where its converse holds. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) (Revised by BJ, 18-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑))
Theorem	rabsn 4697*	Condition where a restricted class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by AV, 26-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐵} = {𝐵})
Theorem	rabsnifsb 4698*	A restricted class abstraction restricted to a singleton is either the empty set or the singleton itself. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jul-2019.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ∣ 𝜑} = if([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑, {𝐴}, ∅)
Theorem	rabsnif 4699*	A restricted class abstraction restricted to a singleton is either the empty set or the singleton itself. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 21-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ∣ 𝜑} = if(𝜓, {𝐴}, ∅)
Theorem	rabrsn 4700*	A restricted class abstraction restricted to a singleton is either the empty set or the singleton itself. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Dec-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 21-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑀 = {𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑀 = ∅ ∨ 𝑀 = {𝐴}))