Theorem rspcef 45657

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 24-Dec-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcef.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
rspcef.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
rspcef.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
rspcef.4	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcef	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem rspcef

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcef.1	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
2		rspcef.2	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3		rspcef.3	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
4		rspcef.4	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
5	1, 2, 3, 4	rspcegf 45608	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1562  Ⅎwnf 1805   ∈ wcel 2144  Ⅎwnfc 2911  ∃wrex 3088

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1817  ax-4 1831  ax-5 1932  ax-6 1989  ax-7 2030  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2214  ax-ext 2736

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-tru 1565  df-ex 1802  df-nf 1806  df-cleq 2756  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-rex 3089

This theorem is referenced by:  iinssdf  45722  rspced  45750  opnvonmbllem1  47211  smfresal  47367  smfmullem2  47371