Theorem sspwimpALT 41252

Description: If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. sspwimpALT 41252 is the completed proof in conventional notation of the Virtual Deduction proof https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sspwimpaltvd.html 41252. It was completed manually. The potential for automated derivation from the VD proof exists. See wvd1 40896 for a description of Virtual Deduction. Some sub-theorems of the proof were completed using a unification deduction (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 9 used elpwgded 40891). Unification deductions employ Mario Carneiro's metavariable concept. Some sub-theorems were completed using a unification theorem (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 5 used elpwi 4550). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sspwimpALT	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem sspwimpALT

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3497	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
2	1	a1i 11	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (⊤ → 𝑥 ∈ V)
3		id 22	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴)
4		elpwi 4550	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
5	3, 4	syl 17	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
6		id 22	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
7	5, 6	sylan9ssr 3980	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)
8	2, 7	elpwgded 40891	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
9	8	uunT1 41107	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
10	9	ex 415	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵))
11	10	alrimiv 1924	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵))
12		dfss2 3954	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵))
13	12	biimpri 230	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
14	11, 13	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
15	14	idiALT 40804	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398  ∀wal 1531  ⊤wtru 1534   ∈ wcel 2110  Vcvv 3494   ⊆ wss 3935  𝒫 cpw 4538

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2793

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-v 3496  df-in 3942  df-ss 3951  df-pw 4540

This theorem is referenced by: (None)