Theorem sspwimpALT 44878

Description: If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. sspwimpALT 44878 is the completed proof in conventional notation of the Virtual Deduction proof https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sspwimpaltvd.html 44878. It was completed manually. The potential for automated derivation from the VD proof exists. See wvd1 44522 for a description of Virtual Deduction. Some sub-theorems of the proof were completed using a unification deduction (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 9 used elpwgded 44517). Unification deductions employ Mario Carneiro's metavariable concept. Some sub-theorems were completed using a unification theorem (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 5 used elpwi 4587). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sspwimpALT	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem sspwimpALT

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3467	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
2	1	a1i 11	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (⊤ → 𝑥 ∈ V)
3		id 22	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴)
4		elpwi 4587	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
5	3, 4	syl 17	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
6		id 22	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
7	5, 6	sylan9ssr 3978	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)
8	2, 7	elpwgded 44517	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
9	8	uunT1 44733	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
10	9	ex 412	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵))
11	10	alrimiv 1926	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵))
12		df-ss 3948	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵))
13	12	biimpri 228	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
14	11, 13	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
15	14	idiALT 44431	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1537  ⊤wtru 1540   ∈ wcel 2107  Vcvv 3463   ⊆ wss 3931  𝒫 cpw 4580

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2006  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-ext 2706

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1779  df-sb 2064  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2808  df-v 3465  df-ss 3948  df-pw 4582

This theorem is referenced by: (None)