Theorem sspwimpALT 43686

Description: If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. sspwimpALT 43686 is the completed proof in conventional notation of the Virtual Deduction proof https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sspwimpaltvd.html 43686. It was completed manually. The potential for automated derivation from the VD proof exists. See wvd1 43330 for a description of Virtual Deduction. Some sub-theorems of the proof were completed using a unification deduction (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 9 used elpwgded 43325). Unification deductions employ Mario Carneiro's metavariable concept. Some sub-theorems were completed using a unification theorem (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 5 used elpwi 4610). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sspwimpALT	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem sspwimpALT

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3479	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
2	1	a1i 11	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (⊤ → 𝑥 ∈ V)
3		id 22	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴)
4		elpwi 4610	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
5	3, 4	syl 17	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
6		id 22	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
7	5, 6	sylan9ssr 3997	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)
8	2, 7	elpwgded 43325	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
9	8	uunT1 43541	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
10	9	ex 414	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵))
11	10	alrimiv 1931	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵))
12		dfss2 3969	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵))
13	12	biimpri 227	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
14	11, 13	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
15	14	idiALT 43238	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 397  ∀wal 1540  ⊤wtru 1543   ∈ wcel 2107  Vcvv 3475   ⊆ wss 3949  𝒫 cpw 4603

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-ext 2704

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1783  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-v 3477  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-pw 4605

This theorem is referenced by: (None)