Theorem suctrALT3 39971

Description: The successor of a transitive class is transitive. suctrALT3 39971 is the completed proof in conventional notation of the Virtual Deduction proof http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctralt3vd.html. It was completed manually. The potential for automated derivation from the VD proof exists. See wvd1 39606 for a description of Virtual Deduction. Some sub-theorems of the proof were completed using a unification deduction (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 19 used jaoded 39603). Unification deductions employ Mario Carneiro's metavariable concept. Some sub-theorems were completed using a unification theorem (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 24 used dftr2 4977) . (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suctrALT3	⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem suctrALT3

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sssucid 6040	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴
2		id 22	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴)
3		id 22	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴))
4	3	simpld 490	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
5		id 22	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
6	2, 4, 5	trelded 39602	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
7	1, 6	sseldi 3825	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
8	7	3expia 1154	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
9		id 22	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑦 = 𝐴)
10		eleq2 2895	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
11	10	biimpac 472	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
12	4, 9, 11	syl2an 589	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
13	1, 12	sseldi 3825	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
14	13	ex 403	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
15	3	simprd 491	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
16		elsuci 6029	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴))
17	15, 16	syl 17	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴))
18	8, 14, 17	jaoded 39603	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
19	18	un2122 39837	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
20	19	ex 403	. . . 4 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
21	20	alrimivv 2027	. . 3 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
22		dftr2 4977	. . . 4 ⊢ (Tr suc 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
23	22	biimpri 220	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) → Tr suc 𝐴)
24	21, 23	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)
25	24	idiALT 39514	1 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 386   ∨ wo 878   ∧ w3a 1111  ∀wal 1654   = wceq 1656   ∈ wcel 2164  Tr wtr 4975  suc csuc 5965

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1894  ax-4 1908  ax-5 2009  ax-6 2075  ax-7 2112  ax-9 2173  ax-10 2192  ax-11 2207  ax-12 2220  ax-ext 2803

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 387  df-or 879  df-3an 1113  df-tru 1660  df-ex 1879  df-nf 1883  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2812  df-cleq 2818  df-clel 2821  df-nfc 2958  df-v 3416  df-un 3803  df-in 3805  df-ss 3812  df-sn 4398  df-uni 4659  df-tr 4976  df-suc 5969

This theorem is referenced by: (None)