Theorem inab 3344

Description: Intersection of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inab	|- ( { x | ph } i^i { x | ps } ) = { x | ( ph /\ ps ) }

Proof of Theorem inab

Dummy variable y is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sban 1928	. . 3 |- ( [ y / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( [ y / x ] ph /\ [ y / x ] ps ) )
2		df-clab 2126	. . 3 |- ( y e. { x | ( ph /\ ps ) } <-> [ y / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) )
3		df-clab 2126	. . . 4 |- ( y e. { x | ph } <-> [ y / x ] ph )
4		df-clab 2126	. . . 4 |- ( y e. { x | ps } <-> [ y / x ] ps )
5	3, 4	anbi12i 455	. . 3 |- ( ( y e. { x | ph } /\ y e. { x | ps } ) <-> ( [ y / x ] ph /\ [ y / x ] ps ) )
6	1, 2, 5	3bitr4ri 212	. 2 |- ( ( y e. { x | ph } /\ y e. { x | ps } ) <-> y e. { x | ( ph /\ ps ) } )
7	6	ineqri 3269	1 |- ( { x | ph } i^i { x | ps } ) = { x | ( ph /\ ps ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 103   = wceq 1331   e. wcel 1480   [wsb 1735   {cab 2125   i^i cin 3070

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2121

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2126  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135  df-nfc 2270  df-v 2688  df-in 3077

This theorem is referenced by:  inrab  3348  inrab2  3349  dfrab2  3351  dfrab3  3352  imainlem  5204  imain  5205  ssenen  6745