Theorem inab 3395

Description: Intersection of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inab	|- ( { x | ph } i^i { x | ps } ) = { x | ( ph /\ ps ) }

Proof of Theorem inab

Dummy variable y is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sban 1948	. . 3 |- ( [ y / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( [ y / x ] ph /\ [ y / x ] ps ) )
2		df-clab 2157	. . 3 |- ( y e. { x | ( ph /\ ps ) } <-> [ y / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) )
3		df-clab 2157	. . . 4 |- ( y e. { x | ph } <-> [ y / x ] ph )
4		df-clab 2157	. . . 4 |- ( y e. { x | ps } <-> [ y / x ] ps )
5	3, 4	anbi12i 457	. . 3 |- ( ( y e. { x | ph } /\ y e. { x | ps } ) <-> ( [ y / x ] ph /\ [ y / x ] ps ) )
6	1, 2, 5	3bitr4ri 212	. 2 |- ( ( y e. { x | ph } /\ y e. { x | ps } ) <-> y e. { x | ( ph /\ ps ) } )
7	6	ineqri 3320	1 |- ( { x | ph } i^i { x | ps } ) = { x | ( ph /\ ps ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 103   = wceq 1348   [wsb 1755   e. wcel 2141   {cab 2156   i^i cin 3120

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 704  ax-5 1440  ax-7 1441  ax-gen 1442  ax-ie1 1486  ax-ie2 1487  ax-8 1497  ax-10 1498  ax-11 1499  ax-i12 1500  ax-bndl 1502  ax-4 1503  ax-17 1519  ax-i9 1523  ax-ial 1527  ax-i5r 1528  ax-ext 2152

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1351  df-nf 1454  df-sb 1756  df-clab 2157  df-cleq 2163  df-clel 2166  df-nfc 2301  df-v 2732  df-in 3127

This theorem is referenced by:  inrab  3399  inrab2  3400  dfrab2  3402  dfrab3  3403  imainlem  5279  imain  5280  ssenen  6829