Theorem inab 3267

Description: Intersection of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inab	⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem inab

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sban 1877	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
2		df-clab 2075	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
3		df-clab 2075	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
4		df-clab 2075	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
5	3, 4	anbi12i 448	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
6	1, 2, 5	3bitr4ri 211	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)})
7	6	ineqri 3193	1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 102   = wceq 1289   ∈ wcel 1438  [wsb 1692  {cab 2074   ∩ cin 2998

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 665  ax-5 1381  ax-7 1382  ax-gen 1383  ax-ie1 1427  ax-ie2 1428  ax-8 1440  ax-10 1441  ax-11 1442  ax-i12 1443  ax-bndl 1444  ax-4 1445  ax-17 1464  ax-i9 1468  ax-ial 1472  ax-i5r 1473  ax-ext 2070

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1292  df-nf 1395  df-sb 1693  df-clab 2075  df-cleq 2081  df-clel 2084  df-nfc 2217  df-v 2621  df-in 3005

This theorem is referenced by:  inrab  3271  inrab2  3272  dfrab2  3274  dfrab3  3275  imainlem  5095  imain  5096  ssenen  6567