ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  inab GIF version

Theorem inab 3339
Description: Intersection of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
inab ({𝑥𝜑} ∩ {𝑥𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem inab
Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 sban 1926 . . 3 ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
2 df-clab 2124 . . 3 (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑𝜓))
3 df-clab 2124 . . . 4 (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
4 df-clab 2124 . . . 4 (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
53, 4anbi12i 455 . . 3 ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓}) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
61, 2, 53bitr4ri 212 . 2 ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)})
76ineqri 3264 1 ({𝑥𝜑} ∩ {𝑥𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)}
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wa 103   = wceq 1331  wcel 1480  [wsb 1735  {cab 2123  cin 3065
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-nfc 2268  df-v 2683  df-in 3072
This theorem is referenced by:  inrab  3343  inrab2  3344  dfrab2  3346  dfrab3  3347  imainlem  5199  imain  5200  ssenen  6738
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator