Theorem inab 3375

Description: Intersection of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inab	⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem inab

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sban 1935	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
2		df-clab 2144	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
3		df-clab 2144	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
4		df-clab 2144	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
5	3, 4	anbi12i 456	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
6	1, 2, 5	3bitr4ri 212	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)})
7	6	ineqri 3300	1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 103   = wceq 1335  [wsb 1742   ∈ wcel 2128  {cab 2143   ∩ cin 3101

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1427  ax-7 1428  ax-gen 1429  ax-ie1 1473  ax-ie2 1474  ax-8 1484  ax-10 1485  ax-11 1486  ax-i12 1487  ax-bndl 1489  ax-4 1490  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2139

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1338  df-nf 1441  df-sb 1743  df-clab 2144  df-cleq 2150  df-clel 2153  df-nfc 2288  df-v 2714  df-in 3108

This theorem is referenced by:  inrab  3379  inrab2  3380  dfrab2  3382  dfrab3  3383  imainlem  5251  imain  5252  ssenen  6796