Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > inab | GIF version |
Description: Intersection of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
inab | ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sban 1935 | . . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) | |
2 | df-clab 2144 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
3 | df-clab 2144 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | |
4 | df-clab 2144 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓) | |
5 | 3, 4 | anbi12i 456 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) |
6 | 1, 2, 5 | 3bitr4ri 212 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}) |
7 | 6 | ineqri 3300 | 1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 103 = wceq 1335 [wsb 1742 ∈ wcel 2128 {cab 2143 ∩ cin 3101 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 699 ax-5 1427 ax-7 1428 ax-gen 1429 ax-ie1 1473 ax-ie2 1474 ax-8 1484 ax-10 1485 ax-11 1486 ax-i12 1487 ax-bndl 1489 ax-4 1490 ax-17 1506 ax-i9 1510 ax-ial 1514 ax-i5r 1515 ax-ext 2139 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-tru 1338 df-nf 1441 df-sb 1743 df-clab 2144 df-cleq 2150 df-clel 2153 df-nfc 2288 df-v 2714 df-in 3108 |
This theorem is referenced by: inrab 3379 inrab2 3380 dfrab2 3382 dfrab3 3383 imainlem 5251 imain 5252 ssenen 6796 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |