| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > inab | GIF version | ||
| Description: Intersection of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| inab | ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | sban 2015 | . . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) | |
| 2 | df-clab 2225 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
| 3 | df-clab 2225 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | |
| 4 | df-clab 2225 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | anbi12i 464 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) |
| 6 | 1, 2, 5 | 3bitr4ri 213 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}) |
| 7 | 6 | ineqri 3424 | 1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ∧ wa 104 = wceq 1402 [wsb 1815 ∈ wcel 2209 {cab 2224 ∩ cin 3219 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 721 ax-5 1500 ax-7 1501 ax-gen 1502 ax-ie1 1546 ax-ie2 1547 ax-8 1557 ax-10 1558 ax-11 1559 ax-i12 1560 ax-bndl 1562 ax-4 1563 ax-17 1579 ax-i9 1583 ax-ial 1587 ax-i5r 1588 ax-ext 2220 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1405 df-nf 1514 df-sb 1816 df-clab 2225 df-cleq 2231 df-clel 2234 df-nfc 2381 df-v 2823 df-in 3226 |
| This theorem is referenced by: inrab 3505 inrab2 3506 dfrab2 3508 dfrab3 3509 imainlem 5460 imain 5461 ssenen 7146 hashf1lem2 11269 ballotfilem2 13211 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |