![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > unrab | GIF version |
Description: Union of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
unrab | ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-rab 2441 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | df-rab 2441 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} | |
3 | 1, 2 | uneq12i 3255 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}) |
4 | df-rab 2441 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))} | |
5 | unab 3370 | . . . 4 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))} | |
6 | andi 808 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))) | |
7 | 6 | abbii 2270 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))} = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))} |
8 | 5, 7 | eqtr4i 2178 | . . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))} |
9 | 4, 8 | eqtr4i 2178 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}) |
10 | 3, 9 | eqtr4i 2178 | 1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 103 ∨ wo 698 = wceq 1332 ∈ wcel 2125 {cab 2140 {crab 2436 ∪ cun 3096 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 699 ax-5 1424 ax-7 1425 ax-gen 1426 ax-ie1 1470 ax-ie2 1471 ax-8 1481 ax-10 1482 ax-11 1483 ax-i12 1484 ax-bndl 1486 ax-4 1487 ax-17 1503 ax-i9 1507 ax-ial 1511 ax-i5r 1512 ax-ext 2136 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-tru 1335 df-nf 1438 df-sb 1740 df-clab 2141 df-cleq 2147 df-clel 2150 df-nfc 2285 df-rab 2441 df-v 2711 df-un 3102 |
This theorem is referenced by: rabxmdc 3421 phiprmpw 12065 unennn 12077 znnen 12078 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |