ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  unrab GIF version

Theorem unrab 3406
Description: Union of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
unrab ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∪ {𝑥𝐴𝜓}) = {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem unrab
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-rab 2464 . . 3 {𝑥𝐴𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)}
2 df-rab 2464 . . 3 {𝑥𝐴𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜓)}
31, 2uneq12i 3287 . 2 ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∪ {𝑥𝐴𝜓}) = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜓)})
4 df-rab 2464 . . 3 {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝜑𝜓))}
5 unab 3402 . . . 4 ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜓)}) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∨ (𝑥𝐴𝜓))}
6 andi 818 . . . . 5 ((𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝜑𝜓)) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∨ (𝑥𝐴𝜓)))
76abbii 2293 . . . 4 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝜑𝜓))} = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∨ (𝑥𝐴𝜓))}
85, 7eqtr4i 2201 . . 3 ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜓)}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝜑𝜓))}
94, 8eqtr4i 2201 . 2 {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)} = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜓)})
103, 9eqtr4i 2201 1 ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∪ {𝑥𝐴𝜓}) = {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)}
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wa 104  wo 708   = wceq 1353  wcel 2148  {cab 2163  {crab 2459  cun 3127
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-rab 2464  df-v 2739  df-un 3133
This theorem is referenced by:  rabxmdc  3454  phiprmpw  12192  unennn  12368  znnen  12369
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator