Theorem unrab 3398

Description: Union of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
unrab	⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem unrab

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rab 2457	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
2		df-rab 2457	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
3	1, 2	uneq12i 3279	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)})
4		df-rab 2457	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))}
5		unab 3394	. . . 4 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))}
6		andi 813	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))
7	6	abbii 2286	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))} = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))}
8	5, 7	eqtr4i 2194	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))}
9	4, 8	eqtr4i 2194	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)})
10	3, 9	eqtr4i 2194	1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 103   ∨ wo 703   = wceq 1348   ∈ wcel 2141  {cab 2156  {crab 2452   ∪ cun 3119

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 704  ax-5 1440  ax-7 1441  ax-gen 1442  ax-ie1 1486  ax-ie2 1487  ax-8 1497  ax-10 1498  ax-11 1499  ax-i12 1500  ax-bndl 1502  ax-4 1503  ax-17 1519  ax-i9 1523  ax-ial 1527  ax-i5r 1528  ax-ext 2152

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1351  df-nf 1454  df-sb 1756  df-clab 2157  df-cleq 2163  df-clel 2166  df-nfc 2301  df-rab 2457  df-v 2732  df-un 3125

This theorem is referenced by:  rabxmdc  3446  phiprmpw  12176  unennn  12352  znnen  12353