Theorem unrab 3393

Description: Union of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
unrab	⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem unrab

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rab 2453	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
2		df-rab 2453	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
3	1, 2	uneq12i 3274	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)})
4		df-rab 2453	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))}
5		unab 3389	. . . 4 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))}
6		andi 808	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))
7	6	abbii 2282	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))} = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))}
8	5, 7	eqtr4i 2189	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))}
9	4, 8	eqtr4i 2189	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)})
10	3, 9	eqtr4i 2189	1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 103   ∨ wo 698   = wceq 1343   ∈ wcel 2136  {cab 2151  {crab 2448   ∪ cun 3114

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-ext 2147

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1346  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-nfc 2297  df-rab 2453  df-v 2728  df-un 3120

This theorem is referenced by:  rabxmdc  3440  phiprmpw  12154  unennn  12330  znnen  12331